Kleinig Paul A, Woodman Richard J, Currow David C
Southern Adelaide Palliative Services, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia.
Flinders Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
J Palliat Med. 2020 Mar;23(3):406-410. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0083. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
Diabetes is increasingly prevalent globally, including in palliative care. Guidelines vary as to the ideal glycemic goals for patients near the end of life. The relationship between hyperglycemia and attributable symptoms late in life remains ill defined. To pilot the association between blood glucose level (BGL) and symptoms (nausea, fatigue, pain, and appetite) and mortality in palliative care patients with diabetes. This prospective observational consecutive cohort study consisted of 17 patients with diabetes admitted to an inpatient palliative care unit. Repeat measures of BGL and symptom distress scores using the patient-reported Symptom Assessment Scale (SAS) were recorded during a five-month period as was patient mortality. The association between BGL and SAS domains was assessed using negative binomial regression and the association between mortality and high versus low BGL was determined using log-rank statistics and Kaplan-Meier curves. All patients had malignancy: 15 had type 2 diabetes and 2 had steroid-induced diabetes. A total of 121 patient observation days were included in the analysis. BGL was inversely associated with patient-reported SAS for nausea (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.70-0.99, = 0.04), but not other symptoms. Insulin usage was also associated with decreased nausea (IRR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.09-0.60, = 0.002). Survival did not differ between low- and high-BGL groups. These findings warrant a larger multisite consecutive cohort study and a re-exploration of current clinical practice. Ultimately, interventional trials comparing strict versus more liberal glycemic control on symptom management and survival are the ideal design to better understand differing levels of glycemic control at the end of life.
糖尿病在全球范围内日益普遍,包括在姑息治疗领域。对于临终患者的理想血糖目标,指南各不相同。高血糖与生命晚期的相关症状之间的关系仍不明确。旨在初步探索糖尿病姑息治疗患者的血糖水平(BGL)与症状(恶心、疲劳、疼痛和食欲)及死亡率之间的关联。这项前瞻性观察性连续队列研究纳入了17名入住住院姑息治疗病房的糖尿病患者。在五个月的时间里记录了使用患者报告的症状评估量表(SAS)对BGL和症状困扰评分的重复测量结果以及患者死亡率。使用负二项回归评估BGL与SAS各领域之间的关联,并使用对数秩统计和Kaplan-Meier曲线确定死亡率与高BGL和低BGL之间的关联。所有患者均患有恶性肿瘤:15例为2型糖尿病,2例为类固醇诱导的糖尿病。分析共纳入121个患者观察日。BGL与患者报告的恶心SAS呈负相关(发病率比[IRR]=0.83,95%置信区间[CI]=0.70-0.99,P=0.04),但与其他症状无关。使用胰岛素也与恶心减轻有关(IRR=0.24,95%CI=0.09-0.60,P=0.002)。低BGL组和高BGL组的生存率无差异。这些发现需要进行更大规模的多中心连续队列研究,并重新审视当前的临床实践。最终,比较严格与更宽松血糖控制对症状管理和生存影响的干预试验是更好地了解临终时不同血糖控制水平的理想设计。