Suppr超能文献

每例恶性肿瘤所需的皮肤活检次数:比较皮肤科医生和非皮肤科医生临床医生之间的皮肤活检使用情况。

Number of skin biopsies needed per malignancy: Comparing the use of skin biopsies among dermatologists and nondermatologist clinicians.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.

出版信息

J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Jan;82(1):110-116. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.08.012. Epub 2019 Aug 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are too few board-certified dermatologists to treat all patients with skin disease. Primary care physicians often serve at the frontline of skin cancer screening.

OBJECTIVE

To compare biopsy use among dermatologist physicians, dermatology advanced practice professionals (APPs), primary care physicians (PCPs), and other nondermatology clinicians.

METHODS

Pathology reports, requisition forms, and clinical notes of skin biopsies submitted to our institution during the study period were reviewed. Skin biopsies for inflammatory conditions, cosmetic or functional purposes, and re-excisions were excluded. The number needed to biopsy (NNB) was calculated as the number of biopsied lesions divided by histologically proven skin cancers.

RESULTS

The NNB by clinician type was 2.82 for dermatology physicians, 4.69 for APPs, 4.55 for nondermatology PCPs, and 6.55 for other nondermatology clinicians (P < .001). The NNB was significant between clinician groups for nonmelanoma skin cancer (dermatology physicians, 2.00; APPs, 2.71; PCPs, 2.36; and other nondermatology clinicians, 3.47; P < .001) but not for melanoma (dermatology clinicians, 14.33; APPs, 20.78; PCPs, 27.80; and other nondermatology clinicians, 53.56; P = .061).

LIMITATIONS

The NNB represents a measure of use but gives no insight into the number of malignant lesions that go unbiopsied and, therefore, undiagnosed. The prevalence of skin cancer varies among dermatology and nondermatology practices. The results are not generalizable to all practice settings.

CONCLUSIONS

Dermatology physicians had the lowest NNB of all clinician groups. PCPs performed similarly to dermatology APPs.

摘要

背景

能够治疗所有皮肤病患者的有证皮肤科医生太少。初级保健医生通常是皮肤癌筛查的第一线。

目的

比较皮肤科医生、皮肤科高级实践专业人员 (APP)、初级保健医生 (PCP) 和其他非皮肤科临床医生的活检使用情况。

方法

回顾研究期间提交给我们机构的病理报告、申请单和皮肤活检的临床记录。排除炎症性疾病、美容或功能性目的以及再切除的活检。活检需要的数量 (NNB) 计算为活检病变数量除以组织学证实的皮肤癌数量。

结果

按医生类型计算的 NNB 分别为皮肤科医生 2.82、APP 为 4.69、非皮肤科 PCP 为 4.55、其他非皮肤科医生为 6.55(P<.001)。非黑色素瘤皮肤癌的医生群体间 NNB 差异有统计学意义(皮肤科医生,2.00;APP,2.71;PCP,2.36;其他非皮肤科医生,3.47;P<.001),但黑色素瘤无差异(皮肤科医生,14.33;APP,20.78;PCP,27.80;其他非皮肤科医生,53.56;P=.061)。

局限性

NNB 代表使用的衡量标准,但不能说明未进行活检和因此未诊断的恶性病变数量。皮肤癌的患病率在皮肤科和非皮肤科实践中有所不同。结果不能推广到所有实践环境。

结论

皮肤科医生的 NNB 是所有医生群体中最低的。PCP 与皮肤科 APP 的表现相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验