Animal Science Department, Federal University of Viçosa, Avenue Peter Henry Rolfs, sn, Animal Science Department, Viçosa, MG 36570-900, Brazil.
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Animal. 2020 Feb;14(2):399-408. doi: 10.1017/S1751731119001848. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
The use of compost bedded pack systems (CBS) has increased over the past 5 years in tropical countries, and studies associating production traits with economical outcomes of this system are warranted. Our objectives were to evaluate productive traits, economic outcomes and the risks of losses of dairy farms that switched from a drylot system (DLS) to a CBS and to compare these with similar farms that did not change their system. We collected data from 18 farms over 36 consecutive months (August 2014 to July 2017). All farms started the study as DLS, and six farms switched to CBS in the second year. The other 12 farms kept their DLS during the 36 months of evaluation. Annual technical and economic indexes per farm were collected and calculated. Additionally, a risk analysis was performed based on a 10-year historical series of milk prices. The results were analysed using a regression model including year and herd as categorical variables (fixed), system and herd size as quantitative variables (fixed), and system × herd as a random variable. Furthermore, a non-metric multidimensional scaling plot was used to evaluate producers' profiles in each year. Milk fat, milk total solids, and somatic cell count did not change when farms switched from DLS to CBS, and averaged 3.80%, 12.04%, and 256 500 cells/ml, respectively. However, milk protein (%) decreased in CBS farms. The majority of milk production variables were not affected. Nevertheless, farms that switched to CBS increased milk production per cow by 13.3% compared with DLS farms. Total operation costs (296 076.83 $/year) were not affected by the system, and neither were the costs of concentrates, roughage, labour or medicines. Net margin per litre (0.09 $/l), operating profit (14.95%), assets per litre (398.68 $/l per day) and return on assets (10.27%) did not change when farms switched from DLS to CBS. Net margin ($/l and $/cow) and asset turnover rate increased in CBS farms. Risk analysis indicated that the risk was reduced by 38% in CBS farms. Furthermore, our analysis showed that producers who switched to CBS had similar technical and economic indexes in the first year before switching their system. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that CBS systems might be promising for producers in tropical countries who are looking for a more productive and less risky system. We did not observe improvements in animal health as previously reported in the literature.
过去 5 年来,堆肥床层包装系统(CBS)在热带国家的使用有所增加,因此有必要对将生产特性与该系统的经济成果相关联的研究进行评估。我们的目的是评估从干圈系统(DLS)转为 CBS 的奶牛场的生产特性、经济成果和亏损风险,并将其与未改变系统的类似奶牛场进行比较。我们收集了 18 个农场在 36 个月(2014 年 8 月至 2017 年 7 月)内的数据。所有农场在研究开始时均为 DLS,第二年有 6 个农场转为 CBS。其余 12 个农场在 36 个月的评估期间保持 DLS。每农场都收集并计算了年度技术和经济指标。此外,还根据牛奶价格的 10 年历史数据系列进行了风险分析。使用包含年份和畜群作为分类变量(固定)、系统和畜群规模作为定量变量(固定)以及系统×畜群作为随机变量的回归模型对结果进行了分析。此外,还使用非度量多维标度图来评估每个年份生产者的概况。从 DLS 转为 CBS 后,牛奶脂肪、牛奶总固体和体细胞计数没有变化,分别平均为 3.80%、12.04%和 256500 个细胞/ml。但是,CBS 农场的牛奶蛋白(%)下降了。大多数牛奶生产变量没有受到影响。尽管如此,与 DLS 农场相比,转为 CBS 的农场每头牛的牛奶产量增加了 13.3%。系统不影响总运营成本(296076.83 美元/年),也不影响浓缩物、粗饲料、劳动力或药物的成本。从 DLS 转为 CBS 后,每升牛奶的净利润(0.09 美元/升)、营业利润(14.95%)、每升资产(每天 398.68 美元/升)和资产回报率(10.27%)均未改变。CBS 农场的每升牛奶净利润(美元和美元/头)和资产周转率增加。风险分析表明,CBS 农场的风险降低了 38%。此外,我们的分析表明,在转换系统之前的第一年,转为 CBS 的生产者具有相似的技术和经济指标。总之,本研究表明,CBS 系统可能对寻求更具生产力和风险较低的系统的热带国家的生产者具有前景。我们没有像文献中以前报道的那样观察到动物健康的改善。