Hepatic resection with thrombectomy in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma associated with macrovascular invasion.

INTRODUCTION

Macrovascular invasion (MVI) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a very poor prognostic factor. Treatment in such cases is still a matter of debate. The goal of this study is to assess short- and long-term results of liver resection and thrombectomy in a series of patients with HCC and MVI.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent liver resection for HCC in the period 2007-2015 (n=120). Of all the patients, 108 did not have MVI, while 12 presented with MVI: 1patient in the common portal vein (Vp4), 8patients in first-order portal branches (Vp3), 1patient in a sectorial branch (Vp2), 1patient in a segmental branch (Vp1); another patient presented with tumor thrombus in a main hepatic venous branch in the confluence with the vena cava (Vv2).

RESULTS

Patients with MVI needed major hepatic resection more frequently than patients without MVI (83.3% vs 25.9%, P<.0001), with no differences in postoperative mortality or severe morbidity. Patients with MVI required a longer operative time and developed more frequently postoperative ascites (33.3% vs 9.3%, P=.034). Global survival at 1, 3 and 5years was 66.7%, 33.3% and 22.2% in patients with IMV, and 90.7%, 72.4% and 52.2% in patients without IMV (P=.009), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatectomy associated with thrombectomy might be justified in a selected group of patients with HCC and MVI, offering a potential benefit in survival with acceptable morbidity.