School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
J Pharm Pharmacol. 2019 Nov;71(11):1635-1644. doi: 10.1111/jphp.13154. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
The selection of sample times for a pharmacokinetic study is important when trapezoidal integration (e.g. non-compartmental analysis) is used to determine the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). The aim of this study was to develop an algorithm that determines optimal times that provide the most accurate AUC by minimising trapezoidal integration error.
The algorithm required initial single individual or mean pooled concentration data but did not specifically require a prior pharmacokinetic model. Optimal sample intervals were determined by minimising trapezoidal error using a genetic algorithm followed by a quasi-Newton method. The method was evaluated against simulated and clinical datasets to determine the method's ability to estimate the AUC.
The sample times produced by the algorithm were able to accurately estimate the AUC of pharmacokinetic profiles, with the relative AUC having 90% confidence intervals of 0.919-1.05 for profiles with two-compartment kinetics. When comparing the algorithm with rich sampling (e.g. phase I trial), the algorithm provided equivalent or superior sample times with fewer observations.
The creation of the algorithm and its companion web application allows users with limited pharmacometric or programming training can obtain optimal sampling times for pharmacokinetic studies.
在使用梯形积分(例如非房室分析)来确定浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)时,选择药代动力学研究的采样时间非常重要。本研究旨在开发一种算法,通过最小化梯形积分误差来确定提供最准确 AUC 的最佳时间。
该算法需要初始的单个个体或平均合并浓度数据,但不需要特定的药代动力学模型。通过遗传算法和拟牛顿法最小化梯形误差来确定最佳采样间隔。该方法通过模拟数据集和临床数据集进行评估,以确定该方法估算 AUC 的能力。
该算法生成的采样时间能够准确估计药代动力学曲线的 AUC,对于具有双室动力学的曲线,相对 AUC 的 90%置信区间为 0.919-1.05。当将该算法与丰富采样(例如 I 期试验)进行比较时,该算法提供了等效或更好的采样时间,所需的观察次数更少。
该算法的创建及其配套的网络应用程序允许具有有限药代动力学或编程培训的用户获得药代动力学研究的最佳采样时间。