Campos Lívia Batista, Silva Andréia Maria da, Moreira Samara Sandy Jeronimo, Santos Caio Sergio, Apolinário Carlos Alexandre de Carvalho, Saraiva Márcia Viviane Alves, Oliveira Moacir Franco de, Silva Alexandre Rodrigues
Laboratory of Animal Germplasm Conservation, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA), Mossoró, RN, Brazil.
Zygote. 2019 Oct;27(5):315-320. doi: 10.1017/S0967199419000315. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
We compare the efficiency of mechanical or enzymatic methods, and their combination, for the isolation of ovarian preantral follicles (PFs) from collared peccaries. The ovaries from six females were subjected to the different methods investigated here. For the enzymatic method, ovary fragments were exposed to collagenase type IV in TCM-HEPES medium; the mechanical procedure was based on ovarian cortex dissociation by using a scalpel blade. The residual solution obtained after the mechanical isolation was subjected to the enzymatic procedure. The number of isolated PFs was quantified and classified as primordial, primary, or secondary; their viability was assessed using trypan blue dye assay. To confirm the results, PFs derived from the most efficient method were evaluated for integrity using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and subjected to a 24 h in vitro culture for subsequent evaluation of viability by using fluorescent probes. A higher number of PFs (P < 0.05) was obtained from the enzymatic method (961.7 ± 132.9) in comparison with the mechanical method (434.3 ± 88.9), but no difference was observed between the two methods and their combination (743.2 ± 92.8). The trypan blue assay showed that the enzymatic method (98.7 ± 0.6%) provided the highest percentage of viable follicles (P < 0.05). Furthermore, SEM confirmed the ultrastructural integrity of the surface architecture of peccary PFs isolated by the enzymatic procedure; epifluorescence microscopy was used to confirm their viability (86.0%). In conclusion, we suggest that the enzymatic method investigated here is useful for the isolation of viable ovarian PFs from collared peccaries.
我们比较了机械法、酶解法及其联合使用从南美野猪中分离卵巢腔前卵泡(PFs)的效率。对6只雌性野猪的卵巢采用此处研究的不同方法进行处理。酶解法中,将卵巢组织块置于含IV型胶原酶的TCM-HEPES培养基中;机械法是使用手术刀刀片解离卵巢皮质。机械分离后得到的残留溶液再进行酶解处理。对分离得到的PFs数量进行定量,并分为原始卵泡、初级卵泡或次级卵泡;使用台盼蓝染色法评估其活力。为证实结果,对源自最有效方法的PFs进行扫描电子显微镜(SEM)检查以评估其完整性,并进行24小时体外培养,随后使用荧光探针评估其活力。与机械法(434.3±88.9)相比,酶解法(961.7±132.9)获得的PFs数量更多(P<0.05),但两种方法及其联合使用之间未观察到差异(743.2±92.8)。台盼蓝检测表明,酶解法(98.7±0.6%)提供的活卵泡百分比最高(P<0.05)。此外,SEM证实了通过酶解程序分离的南美野猪PFs表面结构的超微结构完整性;使用落射荧光显微镜确认其活力(86.0%)。总之,我们认为此处研究的酶解法可用于从南美野猪中分离有活力的卵巢PFs。