• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋关节镜翻修手术的发生率及危险因素

Rates and Risk Factors for Revision Hip Arthroscopy.

作者信息

West Christopher R, Bedard Nicholas A, Duchman Kyle R, Westermann Robert W, Callaghan John J

机构信息

University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, Iowa, 52242.

出版信息

Iowa Orthop J. 2019;39(1):95-99.

PMID:31413682
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6604537/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Revision hip arthroscopy often serves as a measure for a failed primary hip arthroscopy procedure. The purpose of this study was to examine the rate, timing, and risk factors for revision hip arthroscopy using a large national database.

METHODS

The Humana administrative claims dataset was reviewed from 2007 through the second quarter of 2015 to identify patients undergoing hip arthroscopy using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes and laterality modifiers. Patients with subsequent ipsilateral revision hip arthroscopy were identified and the rate and timing of these revisions determined. Subgroup analysis was performed to determine effects of gender, age, body mass index (BMI), osteoarthritis diagnosis, and specific hip arthroscopy procedure on revision rates.

RESULTS

There were 1807 hip arthroscopy procedures identified with a revision rate of 4% (total of 72 procedures). Of the revision procedures, 43% occurred within 6 months after the index procedure, and 86% occurred within 18 months. Age < 50 years was the only significant predictor of revision hip arthroscopy (OR 2.03, CI 1.173.53) with an even distribution across younger age groups. An osteoarthritis diagnosis, gender, and BMI did not represent significant risk factors for revision (OR 0.87, 0.98, 0.9 and CI 0.5-1.51, CI 0.6-1.59, CI 0.37-2.12, respectively). Chondroplasty was the most common procedure leading to revision (46%) followed by labral repair (37%). The most common revision procedures were chondroplasty (44%) followed by femoroplasty (38%).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, 4% of hip arthroscopy procedures underwent revision arthroscopy over the 8-year period. Revision was associated with age < 50, and revisions were most frequently performed for femoroacetabular impingement. The majority of revisions occurred within 18 months after the index procedure. IV.

摘要

背景

翻修髋关节镜检查通常是针对初次髋关节镜手术失败的一种措施。本研究的目的是利用一个大型国家数据库来研究翻修髋关节镜检查的发生率、时间及危险因素。

方法

回顾2007年至2015年第二季度的Humana行政索赔数据集,以使用当前操作术语(CPT)编码和侧别修饰符来识别接受髋关节镜检查的患者。确定随后进行同侧翻修髋关节镜检查的患者,并确定这些翻修的发生率和时间。进行亚组分析以确定性别、年龄、体重指数(BMI)、骨关节炎诊断及特定髋关节镜手术对翻修率的影响。

结果

共识别出1807例髋关节镜手术,翻修率为4%(共72例手术)。在翻修手术中,43%发生在初次手术后6个月内,86%发生在18个月内。年龄<50岁是翻修髋关节镜检查的唯一显著预测因素(OR 2.03,CI 1.17 - 3.53),在较年轻年龄组中分布均匀。骨关节炎诊断、性别和BMI并非翻修的显著危险因素(OR分别为0.87、0.98、0.9,CI分别为0.5 - 1.51、0.6 - 1.59、0.37 - 2.12)。软骨成形术是导致翻修的最常见手术(46%),其次是盂唇修复(37%)。最常见的翻修手术是软骨成形术(44%),其次是股骨成形术(38%)。

结论

总体而言,在8年期间,4%的髋关节镜手术接受了翻修关节镜检查。翻修与年龄<50岁相关,且翻修最常因股骨髋臼撞击症进行。大多数翻修发生在初次手术后18个月内。

相似文献

1
Rates and Risk Factors for Revision Hip Arthroscopy.髋关节镜翻修手术的发生率及危险因素
Iowa Orthop J. 2019;39(1):95-99.
2
What Are the Risk Factors for Revision Surgery After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement at 7-year Followup?髋关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击症7年随访后翻修手术的危险因素有哪些?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1169-1177. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5115-6.
3
Is the Actual Failure Rate of Hip Arthroscopy Higher Than Most Published Series? An Analysis of a Private Insurance Database.髋关节镜检查的实际失败率是否高于大多数已发表的系列?私人保险数据库分析。
Iowa Orthop J. 2020;40(1):135-142.
4
Defining the Learning Curve for Hip Arthroscopy: A Threshold Analysis of the Volume-Outcomes Relationship.定义髋关节镜手术的学习曲线:基于量效关系的阈值分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 May;46(6):1284-1293. doi: 10.1177/0363546517749219. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
5
Revision Hip Arthroscopy Indications and Outcomes: A Systematic Review.翻修髋关节镜检查的适应症与结果:一项系统评价
Arthroscopy. 2015 Oct;31(10):2047-55. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.03.039. Epub 2015 May 29.
6
Low Rates of 5-Year Secondary Surgery and Postoperative Complications After Primary Hip Arthroscopy in More Than 30,000 Patients.超过 30000 例患者初次髋关节镜术后 5 年次要手术率和术后并发症率较低。
Arthroscopy. 2023 Jul;39(7):1639-1648. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.01.100.
7
Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy in the Medicare Patient: A Growing Population.医疗保险患者髋关节镜手术的结果:不断增长的人群。
Iowa Orthop J. 2019;39(1):89-93.
8
Independent Risk Factors for Revision Surgery or Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty After Hip Arthroscopy: A Review of a Large Statewide Database From 2011 to 2012.髋关节镜术后翻修手术或全髋关节置换术的独立危险因素:2011 年至 2012 年全州范围内大型数据库的回顾。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Feb;34(2):464-470. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.297. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
9
Hip arthroscopy in France: An epidemiological study of postoperative care and outcomes involving 3699 patients.法国髋关节镜手术:一项涉及 3699 名患者的术后护理和结果的流行病学研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Feb;107(1):102767. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.102767. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
10
What Factors Predict Conversion to THA After Arthroscopy?关节镜检查后哪些因素可预测转为全髋关节置换术?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Oct;475(10):2538-2545. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5437-z. Epub 2017 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Marked Decline in Revision Rate Over Time After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.髋关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击综合征后,翻修率随时间显著下降。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 May 20;13(5):23259671251326112. doi: 10.1177/23259671251326112. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Benefits of a Postoperative Hip Orthosis After Routine Arthroscopy of the Hip: A Retrospective Cohort Study.髋关节常规关节镜检查术后使用髋关节矫形器的益处:一项回顾性队列研究
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Nov 22;11(11):23259671231212503. doi: 10.1177/23259671231212503. eCollection 2023 Nov.
3
Criteria-Based Rehabilitation Following Revision Hip Arthroscopy: A Clinical Commentary.髋关节翻修关节镜术后基于标准的康复:临床评论
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2023 Apr 1;18(2):477-492. doi: 10.26603/001c.71355. eCollection 2023.
4
Limited clinical utility of a machine learning revision prediction model based on a national hip arthroscopy registry.基于全国髋关节镜检查注册中心的机器学习修正预测模型的临床应用有限。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Jun;31(6):2079-2089. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07054-8. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
5
Denosumab might prevent periprosthetic bone loss after total hip and knee arthroplasties: a review.地诺单抗可能预防全髋关节和膝关节置换术后假体周围骨丢失:一项综述。
Arthroplasty. 2021 Apr 12;3(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s42836-021-00068-6.
6
Association of Preoperative Opioid Use With Complication Rates and Resource Use in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement.术前使用阿片类药物与接受髋关节镜手术治疗股骨髋臼撞击症患者的并发症发生率和资源利用的相关性
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Nov 22;9(11):23259671211045954. doi: 10.1177/23259671211045954. eCollection 2021 Nov.
7
Association Between Comorbid Depression and Rates of Postoperative Complications, Readmissions, and Revision Arthroscopic Procedures After Elective Hip Arthroscopy.择期髋关节镜检查后,共病性抑郁与术后并发症发生率、再入院率及关节镜翻修手术之间的关联
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Sep 7;9(9):23259671211036493. doi: 10.1177/23259671211036493. eCollection 2021 Sep.
8
Revision Hip Arthroscopy in the Native Hip: A Review of Contemporary Evaluation and Treatment Options.初次髋关节镜检查后的髋关节翻修术:当代评估与治疗选择综述
Front Surg. 2021 Jul 5;8:662720. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.662720. eCollection 2021.
9
Evaluation of primary hip arthroscopy complications in mid-term follow-up: a multicentric prospective study.中期随访中初次髋关节镜检查并发症的评估:一项多中心前瞻性研究。
Int Orthop. 2021 Oct;45(10):2525-2529. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-05114-1. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
10
Obesity is associated with less favorable outcomes following hip arthroscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肥胖与髋关节关节镜手术后结果较差相关:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 May;29(5):1483-1493. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06435-9. Epub 2021 Jan 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Complication Rates for Hip Arthroscopy Are Underestimated: A Population-Based Study.髋关节镜检查的并发症发生率被低估:一项基于人群的研究。
Arthroscopy. 2017 Jun;33(6):1194-1201. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.01.021. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
2
What Are the Risk Factors for Revision Surgery After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement at 7-year Followup?髋关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击症7年随访后翻修手术的危险因素有哪些?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1169-1177. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5115-6.
3
Clinical Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopic Surgery: A Prospective Survival Analysis of Primary and Revision Surgeries in a Large Mixed Cohort.髋关节镜手术的临床结果:大型混合队列中原发性和翻修手术的前瞻性生存分析
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Oct;44(10):2505-2517. doi: 10.1177/0363546516663463. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
4
Revision Hip Arthroscopy: A Matched-Cohort Study Comparing Revision to Primary Arthroscopy Patients.髋关节翻修关节镜检查:一项将翻修患者与初次关节镜检查患者进行对比的配对队列研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Oct;44(10):2499-2504. doi: 10.1177/0363546516650888. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
5
When Hip Scopes Fail, They Do So Quickly.髋关节镜手术失败时,往往迅速失败。
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jun;31(6):1183-1187. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.12.024. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
6
Age-Related Trends in Hip Arthroscopy: A Large Cross-Sectional Analysis.髋关节镜检查的年龄相关趋势:一项大型横断面分析。
Arthroscopy. 2015 Dec;31(12):2307-13.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
7
Revision Hip Arthroscopy Indications and Outcomes: A Systematic Review.翻修髋关节镜检查的适应症与结果:一项系统评价
Arthroscopy. 2015 Oct;31(10):2047-55. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.03.039. Epub 2015 May 29.
8
Revision Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review of Diagnoses, Operative Findings, and Outcomes.髋关节镜翻修术:诊断、手术发现及结果的系统评价
Arthroscopy. 2015 Jul;31(7):1382-90. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.12.027. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
9
Does Primary Hip Arthroscopy Result in Improved Clinical Outcomes?: 2-Year Clinical Follow-up on a Mixed Group of 738 Consecutive Primary Hip Arthroscopies Performed at a High-Volume Referral Center.初次髋关节镜检查能否带来更好的临床疗效?对一家高流量转诊中心连续进行的738例初次髋关节镜检查的混合组进行2年临床随访。
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Jan;44(1):74-82. doi: 10.1177/0363546514562563. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
10
Outcomes of hip arthroscopy in patients aged 50 years or older compared with a matched-pair control of patients aged 30 years or younger.50岁及以上患者与年龄匹配的30岁及以下对照患者进行髋关节镜检查的结果。
Arthroscopy. 2015 Feb;31(2):231-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.08.030. Epub 2014 Nov 6.