Suppr超能文献

CT 鉴别复杂与单纯性阑尾炎:10 项 CT 特征的存在与放射科医生的整体评估相比。

CT in Differentiating Complicated From Uncomplicated Appendicitis: Presence of Any of 10 CT Features Versus Radiologists' Gestalt Assessment.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82, Gumi-ro 173 Beon-gil, Bundanggu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do 463-707, Korea.

Department of Statistics, Inha University, Incheon, Korea.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Nov;213(5):W218-W227. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21331. Epub 2019 Aug 15.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to propose a sensitive CT criterion (the presence of any of 10 CT features) for complicated appendicitis that could be used in the nonoperative management of appendicitis and to compare the diagnostic performance of this sensitive CT criterion with that of gestalt assessment. This retrospective study, which was conducted in a tertiary teaching hospital, included 100 patients with suspected appendicitis on CT. Complicated appendicitis, defined as gangrenous or perforated appendicitis, was pathologically or surgically confirmed in 32 patients. Six radiologists independently determined the presence of 10 previously reported CT features of complicated appendicitis (contrast enhancement defect of the appendiceal wall, abscess, extraluminal air, intraluminal air, extraluminal appendicolith, intraluminal appendicolith, moderate-to-severe periappendiceal fat stranding, periappendiceal fluid, ileus, and ascites) and rated the likelihood score for complicated appendicitis using gestalt assessment. The sensitivity and specificity of CT for complicated appendicitis were measured by the presence of any of 10 CT features (the any-of-10-features criterion) and by the radiologists' gestalt assessment. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were compared using a generalized linear mixed model. The pooled sensitivity of the presence of any of 10 CT features was higher than that of gestalt assessment (92% vs 64%; difference, 28% [95% CI, 10-46%]; < 0.001), although the pooled specificity was lower (43% vs 76%; difference, -33% [95% CI, -48% to -17%]; < 0.001). The pooled sensitivity of the presence of any of 10 CT features was higher than that of gestalt assessment, at the cost of lower specificity. For prudent selection of patients who should receive nonoperative treatment of appendicitis, the any-of-10-features criterion may be used to decrease treatment failure associated with a false-negative diagnosis of complication.

摘要

本研究旨在提出一种用于复杂阑尾炎的敏感 CT 标准(存在 10 种 CT 特征中的任何一种),可用于阑尾炎的非手术治疗,并比较这种敏感 CT 标准与整体评估的诊断性能。这项回顾性研究在一家三级教学医院进行,共纳入 100 例 CT 疑似阑尾炎患者。32 例患者经病理或手术证实为坏疽性或穿孔性阑尾炎。6 名放射科医生独立判断 10 种先前报道的复杂阑尾炎 CT 特征(阑尾壁对比增强缺损、脓肿、腔外气、腔内气、腔外阑尾结石、腔内阑尾结石、中重度阑尾周围脂肪条索、阑尾周围积液、肠梗阻和腹水)的存在,并使用整体评估对复杂阑尾炎的可能性评分进行评分。通过存在 10 种 CT 特征中的任何一种(10 种特征中的任何一种标准)和放射科医生的整体评估来测量 CT 对复杂阑尾炎的敏感性和特异性。使用广义线性混合模型比较汇总敏感性和特异性。存在 10 种 CT 特征中的任何一种的汇总敏感性高于整体评估(92%对 64%;差异 28%[95%CI,10%-46%];<0.001),尽管汇总特异性较低(43%对 76%;差异-33%[95%CI,-48%至-17%];<0.001)。存在 10 种 CT 特征中的任何一种的汇总敏感性高于整体评估,但特异性较低。为了谨慎选择应接受阑尾炎非手术治疗的患者,可以使用 10 种特征中的任何一种标准来降低因对并发症的假阴性诊断而导致治疗失败的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验