Liu Liehua, Wang Haoming, Wang Jiangang, Wang Qian, Pu Yu, Wang Zili, Wu Yuexiang, Xu Yuan, Jin Weidong
Department of Spinal Surgery, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region.
Department of Orthopedics, Three Gorges Central Hospital.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Aug;98(33):e16792. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016792.
Extrapedicular infiltration anesthesia (EPIA) was reported for percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) and provided good local anesthetic effects. Because of differences in anatomical morphology at each lumbar level, the puncture method of EPIA is not uniform in each lumbar vertebrae. To accurately insert the anesthetic needle into the extrapedicular region, we researched the puncture method of EPIA at each lumbar level.We retrospectively analyzed computed tomography (CT) images in 230 patients with lumbar osteoporotic fractures, including 59 L1 fractures, 54 L2 fractures, 50 L3 fractures, 36 L4 fractures, and 31 L5 fractures. The puncture of EPIA was simulated in every fractured vertebrae through CT, and the skin puncture point, puncture direction, and puncture depth of the anesthetic needle were observed. These specific parameters were the distance from the skin puncture point to the superior border of the pedicle projection on the skin (distance AD), distance from the skin puncture point to the lateral border of the pedicle projection on the skin (distance BC), sagittal section angle (SSA), transverse section angle (TSA), and depth of EPIA.As the lumbar ordinal number increased, the SSA, distance AD, TSA, and distance BC for each lumbar level gradually increased, and the puncture depth gradually decreased, all these parameters showed significant differences among the 5 lumbar levels (P < .001). The recommended puncture methods for EPIA at each lumbar level, including distance AD, distance BC, SSA, and TSA, were as follows: in L1, 4 mm, 8 mm, 9° and 8°; in L2, 6 mm, 10 mm, 11° and 10°; in L3, 9 mm, 13 mm, 12° and 12°; in L4, 12 mm, 18 mm, 16° and 18°; and in L5, 20 mm, 26 mm, 24° and 24°. The depth of EPIA was 13 mm in L1-L3 and 11 mm in L4-L5.By confirming the skin puncture point and puncture direction of the anesthetic needle, from an anatomical perspective, EPIA is feasible for lumbar PVP (PKP).
经椎弓根外浸润麻醉(EPIA)已被报道用于经皮椎体成形术(PVP)和经皮后凸成形术(PKP),并具有良好的局部麻醉效果。由于每个腰椎节段的解剖形态存在差异,EPIA的穿刺方法在每个腰椎椎体并不统一。为了将麻醉针准确插入椎弓根外区域,我们研究了每个腰椎节段EPIA的穿刺方法。我们回顾性分析了230例腰椎骨质疏松性骨折患者的计算机断层扫描(CT)图像,其中包括59例L1骨折、54例L2骨折、50例L3骨折、36例L4骨折和31例L5骨折。通过CT在每个骨折椎体模拟EPIA穿刺,并观察麻醉针的皮肤穿刺点、穿刺方向和穿刺深度。这些具体参数为皮肤穿刺点到椎弓根投影在皮肤上缘的距离(AD距离)、皮肤穿刺点到椎弓根投影在皮肤外侧缘的距离(BC距离)、矢状面角度(SSA)、横断面角度(TSA)以及EPIA深度。随着腰椎序数增加,每个腰椎节段的SSA、AD距离、TSA和BC距离逐渐增加,穿刺深度逐渐减小,所有这些参数在5个腰椎节段之间均存在显著差异(P<0.001)。每个腰椎节段EPIA的推荐穿刺方法,包括AD距离、BC距离、SSA和TSA如下:L1为4mm、8mm、9°和8°;L2为6mm、10mm、11°和10°;L3为9mm、13mm、12°和12°;L4为12mm、18mm、16°和18°;L5为20mm、26mm、24°和24°。EPIA深度在L1-L3为13mm,在L4-L5为11mm。通过确定麻醉针的皮肤穿刺点和穿刺方向,从解剖学角度来看,EPIA对于腰椎PVP(PKP)是可行的。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015-7-10
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014-4-20
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013-7
Musculoskelet Surg. 2018-12
Acta Orthop Belg. 2016-9