Suppr超能文献

新加坡双耳重度至极重度感音神经性聋儿童双侧人工耳蜗植入的成本效果分析。

Cost-effectiveness analysis of bilateral cochlear implants for children with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss in both ears in Singapore.

机构信息

Agency for Care Effectiveness, Ministry of Health, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Aug 15;14(8):e0220439. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220439. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

A cochlear implant is a small electronic device that provides a sense of sound for the user, which can be used unilaterally or bilaterally. Although there is advocacy for the benefits of binaural hearing, the high cost of cochlear implant raises the question of whether its additional benefits over the use of an acoustic hearing aid in the contralateral ear outweigh its costs. This cost-effectiveness analysis aimed to separately assess the cost-effectiveness of simultaneous and sequential bilateral cochlear implantations compared to bimodal hearing (use of unilateral cochlear implant combined with an acoustic hearing aid in the contralateral ear) in children with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss in both ears from the Singapore healthcare payer perspective. Incremental quality-adjusted life year (QALYs) gained and costs associated with bilateral cochlear implants over the lifetime horizon were estimated based on a four-state Markov model. The analysis results showed that, at the 2017 mean cost, compared to bimodal hearing, patients receiving bilateral cochlear implants experienced more QALYs but incurred higher costs, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of USD$60,607 per QALY gained for simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation, and USD$81,782 per QALY gained for sequential bilateral cochlear implantation. The cost-effectiveness of bilateral cochlear implants is most sensitive to utility gain associated with second cochlear implant, and cost of bilateral cochlear implants. ICERs increased when the utility gain from bilateral cochlear implants decreased; ICERs exceeded USD$120,000 per QALY gained when the utility gain was halved from 0.03 to 0.015 in both simultaneous and sequential bilateral cochlear implantations. The choice of incremental utility gain associated with the second cochlear implant is an area of considerable uncertainty.

摘要

人工耳蜗是一种小型电子设备,可为用户提供声音感知,可以单边或双边使用。虽然有人提倡双耳聆听的好处,但人工耳蜗的高成本引发了一个问题,即其在对侧耳使用声学助听器的额外益处是否超过其成本。这项成本效益分析旨在从新加坡医疗保健支付方的角度,分别评估双侧人工耳蜗同时植入与顺序植入(单边人工耳蜗联合对侧耳声学助听器使用的双耳模式)与双侧人工耳蜗同时植入与顺序植入(单边人工耳蜗联合对侧耳声学助听器使用的双耳模式)相比,在双侧严重至极重度感音神经性听力损失的儿童中的成本效益。基于四状态马尔可夫模型,估计了双侧人工耳蜗植入在整个生命周期内获得的增量质量调整生命年(QALY)和相关成本。分析结果表明,在 2017 年的平均成本下,与双耳模式相比,接受双侧人工耳蜗植入的患者获得了更多的 QALY,但产生了更高的成本,导致双侧人工耳蜗植入的增量成本效益比(ICER)为每获得一个 QALY 需 60607 美元,顺序双侧人工耳蜗植入的每获得一个 QALY 需 81782 美元。双侧人工耳蜗植入的成本效益对第二个人工耳蜗相关效用增益和双侧人工耳蜗植入的成本最为敏感。当双侧人工耳蜗植入的效用增益降低时,ICER 增加;当双侧人工耳蜗植入的效用增益从 0.03 减半至 0.015 时,双侧人工耳蜗植入的 ICER 超过每获得一个 QALY 需 120000 美元。与第二个人工耳蜗相关的增量效用增益的选择是一个存在较大不确定性的领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0da/6695111/8291b124c283/pone.0220439.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验