Obeid Anthony, Ehmann David, Adam Murtaza, Kasi Sundeep, Shahlaee Abtin, Klufas Michael A, Hsu Jason, Mehta Sonia, Chiang Allen, Garg Sunir, Ho Allen C, Gupta Omesh P
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2019 Aug 1;50(8):497-503. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20190806-04.
This study evaluated the residual subfoveal fluid (SFF) immediately after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair using intraoperative optical coherence tomography (iOCT).
This retrospective cohort study assessed fovea-involving RRD repaired by pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) using different drainage techniques. iOCT images were acquired through the fovea at the start of the case prior to initiating vitrectomy and then again immediately prior to introduction of tamponade.
Ten eyes (32.3%) received perfluoro-n-octane (PFO), 12 (38.7%) underwent a posterior drainage retinotomy, and nine (29.0%) had drainage through the retinal break. There was no significant difference in the mean SFF thickness between eyes in either group (P = .85). There was no significant association between SFF thickness on iOCT and functional or anatomic outcomes (P > .05).
There is no difference in the amount of residual SFF as measured on iOCT during RRD repair with pars plana vitrectomy using either direct drainage, drainage retinotomy, or PFO. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2019;50:497-503.].
本研究使用术中光学相干断层扫描(iOCT)评估孔源性视网膜脱离(RRD)修复术后即刻黄斑中心凹下的残留液(SFF)情况。
这项回顾性队列研究评估了采用不同引流技术经平坦部玻璃体切除术(PPV)修复累及黄斑的RRD。在玻璃体切除术开始前,于病例开始时通过黄斑获取iOCT图像,然后在注入填充剂前再次获取。
10只眼(32.3%)接受了全氟正辛烷(PFO)治疗,12只眼(38.7%)进行了后引流视网膜切开术,9只眼(29.0%)通过视网膜裂孔进行引流。两组眼中平均SFF厚度无显著差异(P = 0.85)。iOCT上的SFF厚度与功能或解剖学结果之间无显著关联(P > 0.05)。
在使用直接引流、引流视网膜切开术或PFO的平坦部玻璃体切除术修复RRD过程中,iOCT测量的残留SFF量没有差异。[《眼科手术、激光与影像学杂志》。2019;50:497 - 503。]