Suppr超能文献

日本矫形协会腰痛评估问卷(JOABPEQ)在腰椎管狭窄减压手术后的最小临床重要差异。

Minimally clinically important differences for the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) following decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Shizuoka Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.

Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Clin Neurosci. 2019 Nov;69:93-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.08.025. Epub 2019 Aug 12.

Abstract

Decompression surgery is the standard treatment in lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Recent studies have shown that patient satisfaction following decompression surgery does not correspond well with outcomes measured by conventional patient-reported outcome measurements. Recent study reported that the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) is the most accurate outcome measurement to reflect patient satisfaction. Nevertheless, the JOABPEQ was not studied enough, especially along with the minimally clinically important differences (MCIDs), as JOABPEQ is relatively new questionnaire. The MCID is the minimum score change which patients perceive as beneficial. Thus, knowing the MCID is critical evaluating the efficacy of intervention. The aim of this study was to determine the MCIDs of the JOABPEQ for patients with LSS undergoing decompression surgery. Patients who underwent decompression surgery for LSS were consecutively enrolled if they had a complete set of questionnaires. We determined the MCIDs of each domain in the JOABPEQ using distribution-based and anchor-based methods. The MCIDs were determined to be 20.4 in low back pain, 15.6 in lumbar function, 16.8 in walking ability, 13.4 in social life function, and 9.4 in mental health by the distribution-based method. Using the anchor-based method, the MCIDs were determined to be 28.5, 16.5, 25.0, 21.5, and 14.5, respectively. The MCIDs of the JOABPEQ in LSS were slightly different from 20-point, which was proposed in the JOABPEQ user's manual. Our findings should be considered when evaluating LSS patients undergoing decompression surgery as JOABPEQ is not LSS specific.

摘要

减压手术是腰椎管狭窄症 (LSS) 的标准治疗方法。最近的研究表明,减压手术后患者的满意度与传统的患者报告结局测量结果并不相符。最近的一项研究报告称,日本矫形协会腰痛评估问卷 (JOABPEQ) 是反映患者满意度的最准确的结局测量方法。然而,JOABPEQ 还没有得到足够的研究,特别是在最小临床重要差异 (MCIDs) 方面,因为 JOABPEQ 是一个相对较新的问卷。MCID 是患者认为有益的最小评分变化。因此,了解 MCID 对于评估干预的疗效至关重要。本研究的目的是确定接受减压手术治疗的 LSS 患者的 JOABPEQ 的 MCIDs。如果患者有完整的问卷,将连续纳入接受减压手术治疗 LSS 的患者。我们使用基于分布的和基于锚定的方法来确定 JOABPEQ 每个领域的 MCIDs。基于分布的方法确定 JOABPEQ 在腰痛、腰椎功能、步行能力、社会生活功能和心理健康方面的 MCIDs 分别为 20.4、15.6、16.8、13.4 和 9.4。基于锚定的方法确定 MCIDs 分别为 28.5、16.5、25.0、21.5 和 14.5。LSS 中 JOABPEQ 的 MCIDs 与 JOABPEQ 用户手册中提出的 20 点略有不同。在评估接受减压手术治疗的 LSS 患者时,应考虑到这些发现,因为 JOABPEQ 并非特定于 LSS。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验