• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本矫形协会腰痛评估问卷(JOABPEQ)在腰椎管狭窄减压手术后的最小临床重要差异。

Minimally clinically important differences for the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) following decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Shizuoka Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.

Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Clin Neurosci. 2019 Nov;69:93-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.08.025. Epub 2019 Aug 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.jocn.2019.08.025
PMID:31416735
Abstract

Decompression surgery is the standard treatment in lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Recent studies have shown that patient satisfaction following decompression surgery does not correspond well with outcomes measured by conventional patient-reported outcome measurements. Recent study reported that the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) is the most accurate outcome measurement to reflect patient satisfaction. Nevertheless, the JOABPEQ was not studied enough, especially along with the minimally clinically important differences (MCIDs), as JOABPEQ is relatively new questionnaire. The MCID is the minimum score change which patients perceive as beneficial. Thus, knowing the MCID is critical evaluating the efficacy of intervention. The aim of this study was to determine the MCIDs of the JOABPEQ for patients with LSS undergoing decompression surgery. Patients who underwent decompression surgery for LSS were consecutively enrolled if they had a complete set of questionnaires. We determined the MCIDs of each domain in the JOABPEQ using distribution-based and anchor-based methods. The MCIDs were determined to be 20.4 in low back pain, 15.6 in lumbar function, 16.8 in walking ability, 13.4 in social life function, and 9.4 in mental health by the distribution-based method. Using the anchor-based method, the MCIDs were determined to be 28.5, 16.5, 25.0, 21.5, and 14.5, respectively. The MCIDs of the JOABPEQ in LSS were slightly different from 20-point, which was proposed in the JOABPEQ user's manual. Our findings should be considered when evaluating LSS patients undergoing decompression surgery as JOABPEQ is not LSS specific.

摘要

减压手术是腰椎管狭窄症 (LSS) 的标准治疗方法。最近的研究表明,减压手术后患者的满意度与传统的患者报告结局测量结果并不相符。最近的一项研究报告称,日本矫形协会腰痛评估问卷 (JOABPEQ) 是反映患者满意度的最准确的结局测量方法。然而,JOABPEQ 还没有得到足够的研究,特别是在最小临床重要差异 (MCIDs) 方面,因为 JOABPEQ 是一个相对较新的问卷。MCID 是患者认为有益的最小评分变化。因此,了解 MCID 对于评估干预的疗效至关重要。本研究的目的是确定接受减压手术治疗的 LSS 患者的 JOABPEQ 的 MCIDs。如果患者有完整的问卷,将连续纳入接受减压手术治疗 LSS 的患者。我们使用基于分布的和基于锚定的方法来确定 JOABPEQ 每个领域的 MCIDs。基于分布的方法确定 JOABPEQ 在腰痛、腰椎功能、步行能力、社会生活功能和心理健康方面的 MCIDs 分别为 20.4、15.6、16.8、13.4 和 9.4。基于锚定的方法确定 MCIDs 分别为 28.5、16.5、25.0、21.5 和 14.5。LSS 中 JOABPEQ 的 MCIDs 与 JOABPEQ 用户手册中提出的 20 点略有不同。在评估接受减压手术治疗的 LSS 患者时,应考虑到这些发现,因为 JOABPEQ 并非特定于 LSS。

相似文献

1
Minimally clinically important differences for the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) following decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.日本矫形协会腰痛评估问卷(JOABPEQ)在腰椎管狭窄减压手术后的最小临床重要差异。
J Clin Neurosci. 2019 Nov;69:93-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.08.025. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
2
Minimum clinically important difference of major patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.接受减压手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症患者的主要患者报告结局测量指标的最小临床重要差异。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Sep;196:105966. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105966. Epub 2020 May 30.
3
Outcome measures reflecting patient satisfaction following decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: Comparison of major outcome measures.反映腰椎管狭窄减压手术后患者满意度的结局指标:主要结局指标的比较。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Apr;191:105710. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105710. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
4
Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis without coronal imbalance.矢状位脊柱骨盆对线对无冠状面失衡的腰椎管狭窄减压手术后临床疗效的影响
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Oct;23(4):451-8. doi: 10.3171/2015.1.SPINE14642. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
5
Minimal clinically important difference in patients who underwent decompression alone for lumbar degenerative disease.仅接受减压治疗的腰椎退行性疾病患者的最小临床重要差异。
Spine J. 2022 Apr;22(4):549-560. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.10.010. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
6
Recovery of the Japanese orthopedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire score and walking ability following lumbar spinal stenosis surgery.腰椎管狭窄症手术后日本骨科学会下腰痛评估问卷评分及步行能力的恢复情况。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Jun;33(6):2222-2233. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08238-1. Epub 2024 Apr 7.
7
Tubular surgery with the assistance of endoscopic surgery via a paramedian or midline approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis at the L4/5 level.经旁正中或中线入路在内镜手术辅助下行L4/5节段腰椎管狭窄症的管状手术。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018 May-Aug;26(2):2309499018782546. doi: 10.1177/2309499018782546.
8
Responsiveness of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire in lumbar surgery and its threshold for indicating clinically important differences.日本矫形协会腰痛评估问卷在腰椎手术中的反应性及其指示临床重要差异的阈值。
Spine J. 2019 Jan;19(1):95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.05.013. Epub 2018 May 21.
9
Endoscope-assisted spinal decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.内窥镜辅助下的腰椎管狭窄症减压手术。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Dec;19(6):664-71. doi: 10.3171/2013.8.SPINE13125. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
10
Minimally invasive decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative scoliosis: Predictive factors of radiographic and clinical outcomes.退行性脊柱侧凸型腰椎管狭窄症的微创减压手术:影像学和临床结果的预测因素
J Orthop Sci. 2017 May;22(3):377-383. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2016.12.022. Epub 2017 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimum Clinically Important Difference of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire for Patients with Lumbar Spine Disease Undergoing Posterior Surgery by Generation.按年代划分的接受后路手术的腰椎疾病患者日本骨科学会背痛评估问卷的最小临床重要差异
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2024 Apr 3;8(5):518-527. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2023-0293. eCollection 2024 Sep 27.
2
Efficacy and characteristics of physiotherapy interventions in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review.物理治疗干预腰椎管狭窄症患者的疗效和特点:系统评价。
Eur Spine J. 2022 Jun;31(6):1370-1390. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07222-x. Epub 2022 May 5.
3
Association between mild cognitive impairment and lumbar degenerative disease in a Japanese community: A cross-sectional study.
轻度认知障碍与日本社区腰椎退行性疾病的相关性:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 19;16(10):e0258852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258852. eCollection 2021.
4
Antibiotics should not be used for back/leg pain.抗生素不应被用于治疗背部/腿部疼痛。
Acta Orthop. 2021 Apr;92(2):244-246. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1871190. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
5
Long-Term Surgical Results of Skip Pedicle Screw Fixation for Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Minimum-Ten-Year Follow-Up Study.青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者跳跃式椎弓根螺钉固定的长期手术结果:一项至少十年的随访研究
J Clin Med. 2020 Dec 10;9(12):4002. doi: 10.3390/jcm9124002.
6
A comparison between the low back pain scales for patients with lumbar disc herniation: validity, reliability, and responsiveness.腰椎间盘突出症患者腰痛量表的比较:效度、信度和反应度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jun 10;18(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01403-2.