Suppr超能文献

[想象的风险,或愤怒的狂欢。试图重构并理解西尔维娅·普拉斯现象]

[The risk of imagination, or orgy of anger. Trying to reconstruct and understand the Sylvia Plath-phenomenon].

作者信息

Gerevich József

机构信息

Addiktologiai Kutato Intezet, Budapest, Hungary, E-mail:

出版信息

Psychiatr Hung. 2019;34(2):214-236.

Abstract

To clarify the relationship between literature and psychiatry we can call on the help of the American-English writer Sylvia Plath, who was given electroconvulsive therapy and psychotherapy on a number of occasions for psychiatric illness and later took her own life. This study seeks an answer to five questions. Did Sylvia Plath suffer from psychiatric illness? Did she show signs of the bipolar triad (bipolar affective disorder, trait aggression, substance or behavioural dependence)? Did her activity as a writer have a therapeutic effect? What was the nature of her "confessionalism"? To what extent does her oeuvre reflect her life? Sylvia Plath very probably suffered from a psychiatric illness, namely bipolar 2 affective disorder. The unsuitable treatment of her illness and the interruption of intensive psychotherapy could have contributed to her early death. Together with the bipolar affective disorder, she was also characterised by serious dispositional aggression and emotional dependence. For her, writing was both a source of stress, because her dysthymia intensified her inhibitions, and at the same time self-healing and a self-fulfilling prophecy. The roots of her confessionalism can be found in her personality development suspended in the stage of becoming an adult, and the failure to work through her traumas. Unlike Goethe and Salinger who killed their heroes, having them commit suicide in The Sorrows of Young Werther and A Perfect Day for Bananafish, while both writers recovered from their crisis, Sylvia Plath described a positive development in The Bell Jar and in Ariel, her verse cycle, then put her head in the gas oven. Would she have stayed alive if she had followed the patterns of Goethe and Salinger?

摘要

为了厘清文学与精神病学之间的关系,我们可以借助美裔英国作家西尔维娅·普拉斯的例子。她曾多次因精神疾病接受电休克治疗和心理治疗,后来自杀身亡。本研究旨在回答五个问题。西尔维娅·普拉斯是否患有精神疾病?她是否表现出双相三联征的迹象(双相情感障碍、特质攻击性、物质或行为依赖)?她作为作家的活动是否具有治疗作用?她的“自白主义”本质是什么?她的全部作品在多大程度上反映了她的生活?西尔维娅·普拉斯很可能患有精神疾病,即双相2型情感障碍。对她疾病的不当治疗以及强化心理治疗的中断可能导致了她的早逝。除了双相情感障碍,她还具有严重的性格攻击性和情感依赖特征。对她来说,写作既是压力源,因为她的心境恶劣加剧了她的抑制情绪,同时也是自我治愈和自我实现的预言。她自白主义的根源可以在她停滞于成年阶段的人格发展以及未能克服创伤中找到。与歌德和塞林格不同,后者让他们作品中的主人公自杀,在《少年维特的烦恼》和《香蕉鱼的完美一天》中,两位作家都从危机中恢复过来,而西尔维娅·普拉斯在《钟形罩》和她的组诗《爱丽儿》中描述了积极的发展,然后把头伸进煤气烤箱。如果她遵循歌德和塞林格的模式,她会活下来吗?

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验