• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对细胞生物学研究的信任和参与。

Patient Trust and Participation in Cell Biological Research.

机构信息

Department of IQ healthcare, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Department of Cell Biology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Trends Cell Biol. 2019 Oct;29(10):765-767. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Aug 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.tcb.2019.07.005
PMID:31420106
Abstract

Cell biological research investigates mechanisms of health and disease, with patients as the initial motivation and ultimate target. While increasingly visible in clinical research, patient participation in cell biological research remains limited. Here we discuss key ethical issues inherent in this development and the value of building trust and trustworthiness.

摘要

细胞生物学研究旨在探索健康和疾病的机制,患者是最初的动力和最终的目标。虽然在临床研究中越来越受到关注,但患者参与细胞生物学研究仍然有限。本文讨论了这一发展中固有的关键伦理问题,以及建立信任和值得信赖的价值。

相似文献

1
Patient Trust and Participation in Cell Biological Research.患者对细胞生物学研究的信任和参与。
Trends Cell Biol. 2019 Oct;29(10):765-767. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
2
Taking patient involvement seriously: a critical ethical analysis of participatory approaches in data-intensive medical research.认真对待患者参与:数据密集型医学研究中参与式方法的关键伦理分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Apr 25;19(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0799-7.
3
Beyond Consent: Building Trusting Relationships With Diverse Populations in Precision Medicine Research.超越同意:在精准医学研究中与不同人群建立信任关系。
Am J Bioeth. 2018 Apr;18(4):3-20. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1431322.
4
Permitting patients to pay for participation in clinical trials: the advent of the P4 trial.允许患者为参与临床试验付费:P4试验的出现。
Med Health Care Philos. 2017 Jun;20(2):219-227. doi: 10.1007/s11019-016-9741-2.
5
A Trust-Based Pact in Research Biobanks. From Theory to Practice.生物样本库研究中的信任契约:从理论到实践
Bioethics. 2016 May;30(4):260-71. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12184. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
6
The ethics of research on stored biological samples: outcomes of a Workshop.
Indian J Med Ethics. 2016 Apr-Jun;1(2):118-22. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2016.032.
7
Keep people informed or leave them alone? A suggested tool for identifying research participants who rightly want only limited information.让人们了解情况还是任其自行其是?一种用于识别那些只想获取有限信息的研究参与者的建议工具。
J Med Ethics. 2005 Nov;31(11):674-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.009753.
8
Combining value of information analysis and ethical argumentation in decisions on participation of vulnerable patients in clinical research.在脆弱患者参与临床研究的决策中结合信息分析价值与伦理论证
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Feb 5;19(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0245-x.
9
Is mandatory research ethics reviewing ethical?强制进行研究伦理审查合乎伦理道德吗?
J Med Ethics. 2013 Aug;39(8):517-20. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100274. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
10
Ethical and methodological issues in qualitative studies involving people with severe and persistent mental illness such as schizophrenia and other psychotic conditions: a critical review.涉及精神分裂症和其他精神病性障碍等严重持续性精神疾病患者的定性研究中的伦理和方法学问题:一项批判性综述。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2017;12(sup2):1368323. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2017.1368323.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient engagement in fertility research: bench research, ethics, and social justice.患者参与生育研究:实验室研究、伦理与社会正义。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 May 12;7(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00278-x.