Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
J Endod. 2019 Oct;45(10):1237-1241. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.06.011. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
The goal of this study was to compare the cyclic fatigue resistance of 5 heat-treated nickel-titanium files in reciprocating movement with the same tip size and different cross sections.
Five groups (WaveOne [Dentsply, Ballaigues, Switzerland], WaveOne GOLD [Dentsply], RECIPROC [VDW, Munich, Germany], RECIPROC BLUE [VDW GmbH, Munich, Germany], and TF [Sybron Endo, Glendora, CA] Adaptive) of 24 files each of the rotary files were examined. Cyclic fatigue resistance was compared between groups by determining the time needed to fracture and the number of cycles to failure in a cyclic fatigue testing device with 2 different curvatures, the first with a 5-mm radius of curvature and a 60° angle and the second with a double curvature, coronal curvature of 60° angle and a radius of 5 mm, and an apical curvature of 70° angle and a 2-mm radius. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation was performed at the fracture sites to investigate the types of fracture.
RECIPROC BLUE group had a higher mean time to fracture followed by RECIPROC and WaveOne GOLD for both single and double curvature. WaveOne had a higher mean time to fracture in a single curvature canal than TF Adaptive, whereas the opposite was true for a double curvature canal. Both RECIPROC groups were significantly greater in cyclic fatigue resistance in comparison with all other groups (P < .05). WaveOne GOLD was significantly greater than the WaveOne and TF Adaptive groups (P < .05).
RECIPROC BLUE files exhibited significantly greater cyclic fatigue resistance compared with other files tested in an S-shaped artificial canal.
本研究的目的是比较 5 种经热处理的镍钛根管锉在往复运动中的抗疲劳性能,这些锉具有相同的尖端尺寸和不同的横截面。
研究共检测了 5 组(WaveOne [登士柏,Ballaigues,瑞士]、WaveOne GOLD [登士柏]、RECIPROC [VDW,慕尼黑,德国]、RECIPROC BLUE [VDW GmbH,慕尼黑,德国]和 TF [赛特力,Glendora,CA]自适应),每组 24 根旋转锉。通过在具有 2 种不同曲率的循环疲劳测试装置中确定断裂所需的时间和失效循环数来比较组间的循环疲劳阻力,第一种曲率半径为 5mm,角度为 60°,第二种曲率为双曲率,冠部曲率为 60°,半径为 5mm,根尖部曲率为 70°,半径为 2mm。在断裂部位进行扫描电子显微镜评估,以研究断裂类型。
在单弯曲和双弯曲根管中,RECIPROC BLUE 组的平均断裂时间均最长,其次是 RECIPROC 和 WaveOne GOLD。在单弯曲根管中,WaveOne 的平均断裂时间长于 TF Adaptive,而在双弯曲根管中则相反。与其他所有组相比,RECIPROC 两组的循环疲劳阻力均显著更高(P<0.05)。WaveOne GOLD 与 WaveOne 和 TF Adaptive 组相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
与其他在 S 形人工根管中测试的锉相比,RECIPROC BLUE 锉表现出显著更高的循环疲劳阻力。