Suppr超能文献

经口内镜肌切开术后贲门失弛缓症患者临床失败的风险评分系统。

A risk-scoring system to predict clinical failure for patients with achalasia after peroral endoscopic myotomy.

机构信息

Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Jan;91(1):33-40.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.07.036. Epub 2019 Aug 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

We aimed to establish a predictive model and develop a simple risk-scoring system (Zhongshan POEM Score) to help clinicians to characterize high-risk patients for clinical failure after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).

METHODS

A total of 1538 patients with achalasia treated with POEM with available follow-up data were included in this study and were randomly classified to the training cohort (n = 769) or internal validation cohort (n = 769). A risk-scoring system was developed using multivariate Cox regression analysis in the training cohort. The system was then internally validated by survival analysis in the validation cohort.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up time of 42 months, 109 patients had clinical failure. In the training stage, 3 risk factors for clinical failure were weighted with point values: previous treatment (2 points), intraprocedural mucosal injury (2 points for type I and 6 points for type II), and clinical reflux (3 points). The patients were categorized into low-risk and high-risk groups. In the validation stage, Kaplan-Meier curves differed significantly between the 2 groups. Patients in the high-risk group had a significantly higher risk of clinical failure than those in the low-risk group (hazard ratio, 3.99; 95% confidence interval, 2.31-6.91; P < .001). Satisfactory discrimination and calibration were shown.

CONCLUSIONS

This risk-scoring system demonstrated good performance in predicting clinical failure in patients who underwent POEM.

摘要

背景与目的

我们旨在建立一个预测模型,并开发一个简单的风险评分系统(中山 POEM 评分),以帮助临床医生识别 POEM 术后临床失败的高危患者。

方法

本研究共纳入 1538 例接受 POEM 治疗的贲门失弛缓症患者,且均有随访资料。患者被随机分为训练队列(n=769)或内部验证队列(n=769)。采用多变量 Cox 回归分析在训练队列中建立风险评分系统。然后,通过验证队列中的生存分析对该系统进行内部验证。

结果

在中位随访时间 42 个月期间,有 109 例患者发生临床失败。在训练阶段,有 3 个临床失败的风险因素被赋予了分值:既往治疗(2 分)、术中黏膜损伤(I 型 2 分,II 型 6 分)和临床反流(3 分)。患者被分为低危组和高危组。在验证阶段,两组之间的 Kaplan-Meier 曲线差异有统计学意义。高危组患者的临床失败风险明显高于低危组(危险比,3.99;95%置信区间,2.31-6.91;P<0.001)。该评分系统显示出良好的区分度和校准度。

结论

该风险评分系统在预测 POEM 术后患者临床失败方面表现良好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验