Department of Surgical Oncology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, PR China; Key Laboratory of Gastric Cancer Molecular Pathology of Liaoning Province, Shenyang, PR China.
Department of Surgical Oncology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, PR China; Key Laboratory of Gastric Cancer Molecular Pathology of Liaoning Province, Shenyang, PR China.
J Surg Res. 2020 Jan;245:234-243. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.044. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
Conversion therapy is intended to allow achieving R0 resection after chemotherapy for tumors initially considered unresectable or partially resectable. Neoadjuvant intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy (NIPS) is the current conversion therapy for gastric cancer (GC) patients with peritoneal metastasis. This meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness and safety of NIPS-combined surgery for GC patients with peritoneal metastasis.
Standard methods were used to select and analyze studies that included GC patients with peritoneal metastasis assigned to two groups, either NIPS-combined surgery or a NIPS-only control. Publications were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, and the Cochrane Central Register. Overall survival, conversion therapy success and R0 resection rates, and adverse events were analyzed using Stata 11.0.
Eight of the 14 studies that were evaluated after screening the titles and abstracts of 327 retrieved publications met the selection criteria. The eight retrospective studies included 373 patients with GC and peritoneal metastasis included 265 with NIPS-combined surgery and 109 with NIPS only. Survival was significantly better with NIPS-combined surgery than with NIPS only (hazard ratio = 0.440, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.274-0.704; P = 0.0001; odds ratio = 1.960; 95% CI: 1.247-3.083; P = 0.004). Subgroup analysis revealed significantly better survival with S-1 Joint intravenous paclitaxel and intraperitoneal paclitaxel compared with other NIPS regimens. NIPS regimens had a higher conversion rate (effect size [ES] = 0.656; 95% CI: 0.495-0.817; P < 0.05), higher percentage of patients with R0 surgery (ES = 0.633; 95% CI: 0.568-0.699; P < 0.05), less severe adverse reactions to chemotherapy (ES = 0.030; 95% CI: 0.020-0.040; P < 0.05), and fewer postoperative complications (ES = 0.040; 95% CI: 0.020-0.050; P < 0.05).
NIPS-combined surgical treatment was effective and safe for treating GC with peritoneal metastasis. Higher quality trials, better patient selection, and multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to support standard treatment guidelines.
转化治疗旨在使最初被认为不可切除或部分可切除的肿瘤在化疗后达到 R0 切除。新辅助腹腔内和全身化疗(NIPS)是目前治疗有腹膜转移的胃癌(GC)患者的转化治疗方法。本荟萃分析评估了 NIPS 联合手术治疗有腹膜转移的 GC 患者的有效性和安全性。
采用标准方法筛选并分析了纳入有腹膜转移 GC 患者的研究,这些患者被分为 NIPS 联合手术组或 NIPS 对照组。从 PubMed、EMBASE、Medline 和 Cochrane 中心注册处检索出版物。使用 Stata 11.0 分析总生存率、转化治疗成功率和 R0 切除率以及不良事件。
在筛选了 327 篇检索文献的标题和摘要后,评估了 14 项研究中的 8 项。这 8 项回顾性研究纳入了 373 例有 GC 和腹膜转移的患者,其中 265 例接受了 NIPS 联合手术治疗,109 例接受了 NIPS 单药治疗。与 NIPS 单药治疗相比,NIPS 联合手术治疗的生存明显更好(风险比=0.440,95%置信区间[CI]:0.274-0.704;P=0.0001;优势比=1.960;95% CI:1.247-3.083;P=0.004)。亚组分析显示,S-1 联合静脉紫杉醇和腹腔内紫杉醇的 NIPS 方案比其他 NIPS 方案的生存获益更显著。NIPS 方案的转化率更高(效应量[ES]为 0.656;95% CI:0.495-0.817;P<0.05),R0 手术的患者比例更高(ES 为 0.633;95% CI:0.568-0.699;P<0.05),化疗不良反应更轻微(ES 为 0.030;95% CI:0.020-0.040;P<0.05),术后并发症更少(ES 为 0.040;95% CI:0.020-0.050;P<0.05)。
NIPS 联合手术治疗有腹膜转移的 GC 是有效和安全的。需要更高质量的试验、更好的患者选择和多中心随机对照试验来支持标准治疗指南。