• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线消费者健康信息的健康结局:一项基于框架综合法的系统混合研究综述

Health outcomes of online consumer health information: A systematic mixed studies review with framework synthesis.

作者信息

Pluye Pierre, El Sherif Reem, Granikov Vera, Hong Quan Nha, Vedel Isabelle, Galvao Maria Cristiane Barbosa, Frati Francesca E Y, Desroches Sophie, Repchinsky Carol, Rihoux Benoît, Légaré France, Burnand Bernard, Bujold Mathieu, Grad Roland

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine McGill University 5858, Chemin de la Côte-des-Neiges, Suite 300, Montréal QC H3S 1Z1 Canada.

Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirao Preto University of Sao Paulo Avenida Bandeirantes 3900, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo CEP 14049-900 Brazil.

出版信息

J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2019 Jul;70(7):643-659. doi: 10.1002/asi.24178. Epub 2019 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1002/asi.24178
PMID:31423458
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6686988/
Abstract

The Internet has become the first source of consumer health information. Most theoretical and empirical studies are centered on information needs and seeking, rather than on information outcomes. This review's purpose is to explore and explain health outcomes of Online Consumer Health Information (OCHI) in primary care. A participatory systematic mixed studies review with a framework synthesis was undertaken. Starting from an initial conceptual framework, our specific objectives were to (a) identify types of OCHI outcomes in primary care, (b) identify factors associated with these outcomes, and (c) integrate these factors and outcomes into a comprehensive revised framework combining an information theory and a psychosocial theory of behavior. The results of 65 included studies were synthesized using a qualitative thematic data analysis. The themes derived from the literature underwent a harmonization process that produced a comprehensive typology of OCHI outcomes. The revised conceptual framework specifies four individual and one organizational level of OCHI outcomes, while including factors such as consumers' information needs and four interdependent contextual factors. It contributes to theoretical knowledge about OCHI health outcomes, and informs future research, information assessment methods, and tools to help consumers find and use health information.

摘要

互联网已成为消费者健康信息的首要来源。大多数理论和实证研究都集中在信息需求和信息寻求上,而非信息结果。本综述的目的是探讨和解释初级保健中在线消费者健康信息(OCHI)的健康结果。我们开展了一项采用框架综合法的参与式系统混合研究综述。从最初的概念框架出发,我们的具体目标是:(a)确定初级保健中OCHI结果的类型;(b)确定与这些结果相关的因素;(c)将这些因素和结果整合到一个结合信息理论和行为心理社会理论的全面修订框架中。我们使用定性主题数据分析对65项纳入研究的结果进行了综合。从文献中得出的主题经过了一个协调过程,形成了OCHI结果的全面类型学。修订后的概念框架明确了OCHI结果的四个个体层面和一个组织层面,同时纳入了消费者信息需求等因素以及四个相互依存的背景因素。它有助于丰富关于OCHI健康结果的理论知识,并为未来的研究、信息评估方法及帮助消费者查找和使用健康信息的工具提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19cb/6686988/7af0a2af2903/ASI-70-643-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19cb/6686988/c477b2734c23/ASI-70-643-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19cb/6686988/26f125108dd5/ASI-70-643-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19cb/6686988/b1f4439c531c/ASI-70-643-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19cb/6686988/a5c499f23a4a/ASI-70-643-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19cb/6686988/7af0a2af2903/ASI-70-643-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19cb/6686988/c477b2734c23/ASI-70-643-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19cb/6686988/26f125108dd5/ASI-70-643-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19cb/6686988/b1f4439c531c/ASI-70-643-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19cb/6686988/a5c499f23a4a/ASI-70-643-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19cb/6686988/7af0a2af2903/ASI-70-643-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Health outcomes of online consumer health information: A systematic mixed studies review with framework synthesis.在线消费者健康信息的健康结局:一项基于框架综合法的系统混合研究综述
J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2019 Jul;70(7):643-659. doi: 10.1002/asi.24178. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
2
Reducing Negative Outcomes of Online Consumer Health Information: Qualitative Interpretive Study with Clinicians, Librarians, and Consumers.减少在线消费者健康信息的负面结果:针对临床医生、图书馆员和消费者的定性解释性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 4;20(5):e169. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9326.
3
Dr Google and the consumer: a qualitative study exploring the navigational needs and online health information-seeking behaviors of consumers with chronic health conditions.谷歌医生与消费者:一项定性研究,探索慢性病患者的导航需求及在线健康信息寻求行为
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Dec 2;16(12):e262. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3706.
4
Outcomes of searching for online health and parenting information on behalf of others: A mixed methods research study.代表他人搜索在线健康与育儿信息的结果:一项混合方法研究
Ann Fam Med. 2022 Apr 1;20(Suppl 1):3116. doi: 10.1370/afm.20.s1.3116.
5
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
6
Consumer Evaluation of the Quality of Online Health Information: Systematic Literature Review of Relevant Criteria and Indicators.消费者对在线健康信息质量的评估:相关标准和指标的系统文献综述
J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 2;21(5):e12522. doi: 10.2196/12522.
7
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
8
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
9
Contexts and Outcomes of Proxy Online Health Information Seeking: Mixed Studies Review With Framework Synthesis.代理在线健康信息搜索的背景和结果:混合研究综述与框架综合。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jun 24;24(6):e34345. doi: 10.2196/34345.
10
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Horse owners seeking online health information: a mixed-methods study.寻求在线健康信息的马主:一项混合方法研究。
Front Vet Sci. 2025 Jul 23;12:1628421. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1628421. eCollection 2025.
2
Usability and Impact of the Web-Based Dementia Foundations Educational Program in Personal Support Workers (PSWs), PSW Trainees, and Care Companions: Quasi-Experimental Study.基于网络的痴呆症基础教育培训项目在个人支持工作者、个人支持工作者学员和护理陪伴人员中的可用性及影响:准实验研究
JMIR Aging. 2025 Jul 21;8:e67889. doi: 10.2196/67889.
3
Outcomes of guidelines from health technology assessment organizations in community-based primary care: a systematic mixed studies review.

本文引用的文献

1
Reducing Negative Outcomes of Online Consumer Health Information: Qualitative Interpretive Study with Clinicians, Librarians, and Consumers.减少在线消费者健康信息的负面结果:针对临床医生、图书馆员和消费者的定性解释性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 4;20(5):e169. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9326.
2
Ecological content validation of the Information Assessment Method for parents (IAM-parent): A mixed methods study.家长信息评估方法(IAM-家长版)的生态内容效度:一项混合方法研究。
Eval Program Plann. 2018 Feb;66:79-88. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.09.011. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
3
Convergent and sequential synthesis designs: implications for conducting and reporting systematic reviews of qualitative and quantitative evidence.
基于社区的初级保健中卫生技术评估组织指南的结果:系统混合研究综述。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Nov 14;40(1):e56. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000370.
4
Navigating online health information: Insights into consumer influence and decision-making strategies-An overview of reviews.网络健康信息导航:消费者影响与决策策略洞察——综述概述
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 29;10:20552076241286815. doi: 10.1177/20552076241286815. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
5
Exploring the relationship between older adults' online health information seeking, negative emotions and prevention behaviors in the pandemic context: a two-wave longitudinal study.在大流行背景下探讨老年人在线健康信息搜索、负面情绪与预防行为之间的关系:一项两波纵向研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 12;12:1377017. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1377017. eCollection 2024.
6
Factors Influencing Treatment Success in Cholesteatoma Management: A Cross-Sectional Study.胆脂瘤治疗成功的影响因素:一项横断面研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 29;13(9):2606. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092606.
7
The value and impact of health technology assessment: discussions and recommendations from the 2023 Health Technology Assessment International Global Policy Forum.健康技术评估的价值和影响:2023 年健康技术评估国际全球政策论坛的讨论和建议。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Dec 22;39(1):e75. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323002763.
8
How People Use Web-Based Parenting Information to Support Others in Their Social Circle: Qualitative Descriptive Study.人们如何利用基于网络的育儿信息来支持社交圈中的其他人:定性描述性研究。
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2023 Apr 28;6:e40043. doi: 10.2196/40043.
9
Getting Connected to M-Health Technologies through a Meta-Analysis.通过元分析与移动医疗技术连接。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 28;20(5):4369. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054369.
10
Research on the influencing factors of users' information processing in online health communities based on heuristic-systematic model.基于启发式系统模型的在线健康社区用户信息处理影响因素研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 17;13:966033. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.966033. eCollection 2022.
收敛性和序列性综合设计:对定性和定量证据进行系统评价的实施与报告的影响
Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 23;6(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0454-2.
4
De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote.在EndNote中对系统评价的数据库搜索结果进行去重。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Jul;104(3):240-3. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.104.3.014.
5
Opening-up the definition of systematic literature review: the plurality of worldviews, methodologies and methods for reviews and syntheses.拓展系统文献综述的定义:综述与综合的世界观、方法论及方法的多元性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 May;73:2-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.033. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
6
Performance of a mixed filter to identify relevant studies for mixed studies reviews.用于混合研究综述以识别相关研究的混合过滤器的性能。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Jan;104(1):47-51. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.104.1.007.
7
ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed.ROBIS:一种用于评估系统评价中偏倚风险的新工具被开发出来。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;69:225-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
8
Systematic mixed studies reviews: updating results on the reliability and efficiency of the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.系统混合研究综述:更新混合方法评估工具的可靠性和效率结果。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Jan;52(1):500-1. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.08.010. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
9
Development and content validation of the information assessment method for patients and consumers.患者及消费者信息评估方法的开发与内容验证
JMIR Res Protoc. 2014 Feb 18;3(1):e7. doi: 10.2196/resprot.2908.
10
Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews.结合故事的力量和数字的力量:混合方法研究和混合研究综述。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:29-45. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182440. Epub 2013 Oct 30.