Aboubakr Mostafa, Yousaf Muhammad Ismail Khalid, Weisbrod Luke J., Alameda Gustavo
University of Miami at Holy Cross
University Of Louisville School Of Medicine
Death is defined in the United States by the Uniform Determination of Death Act (UDDA), proposed in 1981. A determination of death must be made in accordance with the accepted medical standards and must additionally include one of the following: 1. Irreversible cessation of circulatory and pulmonary functions. 2. Irreversible cessation of all functions of the entire brain, including the brainstem, is dead. . The UDDA was drafted in the late 1970s in response to medical advances in life support that allowed for complete circulatory and respiratory support despite complete cessation of brain function. The UDDA did not establish what "accepted medical standards" were; instead, only that they existed. The American Academy of Neurology (AAN) published the initial standards in 1995, which were updated in 2010 to the current standards. AAN's recent position statement on brain death endorses UDDA's death definition as "irreversible loss of entire brain, including the brainstem, has been determined by the demonstration of complete loss of consciousness (coma), brainstem reflexes, and the independent capacity for the ventilatory drive (apnea), in the absence of any factors that imply possible reversibility." Irreversibility in the definition of death refers to the impossibility of recovery, regardless of any medical intervention, which requires clear elaboration, as with the advancement of mechanical ventilation and life support technologies during the 20th century, patients who suffered severe brain damage could be maintained physiologically for prolonged periods in intensive care units (ICUs). AAN, in addition, believes "preserved neuroendocrine function may be present despite irreversible injury of the cerebral hemispheres and brainstem and is not inconsistent with the whole brain standard of death." In 2012, the World Health Organization (WHO) partnered with an international forum to endorse brain death as the official diagnosis of death. However, internationally and even within different states of the United States, there is no uniformity to certify brain death. Brain death criteria also differ based on the patient's age. Therefore, different criteria are in effect to perform a document of brain death, and the provider should be cognizant of their country/state's criteria for a specific patient's age. It is essential to distinguish the term "brain death" from "coma" to the public, as coma may imply a limited form of life. The understanding that brain death is equivalent to death helps guide decision-making for both physicians and patients' families regarding the withdrawal of care and prevents the unnecessary expenditure of resources. An essential topic that evolved in parallel with brain death is obtaining organs for transplantation. According to the "dead donor rule," organ procurement can occur only after death has been declared. Therefore, for patients who are brain dead, the procurement of viable organs is allowed, even if a patient still has some circulatory and/or pulmonary function. This concept continues to result in some ongoing debate and controversy. It is also crucial to differentiate brain death from other forms of severe brain damage, including vegetative state (VS) and minimally responsive state (MRS). In VS and MRS, some brain functions are maintained, resulting in a chance of recovery, even occasionally after prolonged periods, especially in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).
在美国,死亡是由1981年提出的《统一死亡判定法案》(UDDA)定义的。死亡判定必须符合公认的医学标准,此外还必须包括以下情形之一:1. 循环和呼吸功能不可逆转地停止。2. 全脑(包括脑干)所有功能不可逆转地停止,即脑死亡。UDDA于20世纪70年代末起草,以应对生命支持方面的医学进展,尽管脑功能完全停止,但仍能实现完全的循环和呼吸支持。UDDA并未确立什么是“公认的医学标准”;相反,只是表明其存在。美国神经病学学会(AAN)于1995年发布了初始标准,并于2010年更新为现行标准。AAN最近关于脑死亡的立场声明认可UDDA的死亡定义,即“在没有任何可能暗示可逆性的因素的情况下,通过证明意识完全丧失(昏迷)、脑干反射以及自主呼吸驱动能力(呼吸暂停)的丧失,确定全脑(包括脑干)不可逆转地丧失”。死亡定义中的不可逆性是指无论任何医学干预都不可能恢复,这需要明确阐述,因为随着20世纪机械通气和生命支持技术的进步,严重脑损伤的患者可以在重症监护病房(ICU)中长时间维持生理状态。此外,AAN认为“尽管大脑半球和脑干受到不可逆损伤,但神经内分泌功能可能仍然存在,这与全脑死亡标准并不矛盾”。2012年,世界卫生组织(WHO)与一个国际论坛合作,认可脑死亡作为死亡的官方诊断。然而,在国际上甚至在美国的不同州,认证脑死亡并没有统一标准。脑死亡标准也因患者年龄而异。因此,执行脑死亡文件有不同的标准,医疗人员应该了解其所在国家/州针对特定患者年龄的标准。向公众区分“脑死亡”和“昏迷”这两个术语至关重要,因为昏迷可能意味着有限形式的生命。认识到脑死亡等同于死亡有助于指导医生和患者家属在停止治疗方面的决策,并防止资源的不必要消耗。与脑死亡并行发展的一个重要话题是获取用于移植的器官。根据“死亡供体规则”,器官获取只能在宣布死亡后进行。因此,对于脑死亡的患者,即使患者仍有一些循环和/或呼吸功能,也允许获取可用器官。这一概念仍然引发了一些持续的辩论和争议。区分脑死亡与其他形式的严重脑损伤,包括植物状态(VS)和微意识状态(MRS)也至关重要。在VS和MRS中,一些脑功能得以维持,导致有恢复的机会,即使偶尔是在长时间之后,尤其是在创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者中。