• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保乳手术中腔镜下环形切除:一项随机对照试验。

Circumferential Shaving of the Cavity in Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Breast Surgery, Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Dec;26(13):4256-4263. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07725-w. Epub 2019 Aug 19.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-019-07725-w
PMID:31429019
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This randomized controlled trial aimed to investigate the effects of circumferential shaving on reducing the intraoperative margin positivity rate (MPR) during breast-conserving surgery (BCS).

METHODS

Eligible breast cancer patients were randomly assigned into no-shave and shave groups. In the no-shave group, the cavity margins were collected for assessment after the tumor resection, whereas in the shave group, a circumferential shaving was performed before collecting the cavity margins. The primary outcome was the intraoperative MPR by frozen section analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 181 patients, with a median age of 49 years, were randomized. Patient characteristics at baseline were well-balanced between the two groups. The intraoperative MPRs (12.1% vs. 7.8%, p = 0.38), postoperative MPRs (16.5% vs. 7.8%, p = 0.073), intraoperative re-excision rates (26.4% vs. 23.3%, p = 0.64), second operation rates (4.4% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.34), and successful BCS rate (93.4% vs. 94.4%, p = 0.94) were all similar between the no-shave and the shave groups. The volume of the shaved tissues was significantly increased in patients with larger breast volume (p < 0.01). In patients with C-E cup breasts, the no-shave and shave groups had 16.7% and 0% (p = 0.03) intraoperative MPRs, and 22.0% and 0% (p = 0.01) postoperative MPRs, respectively. In patients with A-B cup breasts, the MPRs were similar between the two groups. The presence of the ductal carcinoma in situ component is the only determinant of margin positivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Circumferential shaving did not significantly reduce the MPR in BCS. Its benefit depends on the volume of the shaved tissues and the breast. Trial registration This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02648802).

摘要

背景

本随机对照试验旨在探讨环周 shave 对降低保乳手术(BCS)术中切缘阳性率(MPR)的影响。

方法

将符合条件的乳腺癌患者随机分为不 shave 组和 shave 组。在不 shave 组中,在肿瘤切除后收集腔隙切缘进行评估,而在 shave 组中,在收集腔隙切缘前进行环周 shave。主要结局是通过冷冻切片分析的术中 MPR。

结果

共纳入 181 例中位年龄为 49 岁的患者,随机分组。两组患者的基线特征均衡。术中 MPR(12.1% vs. 7.8%,p=0.38)、术后 MPR(16.5% vs. 7.8%,p=0.073)、术中再次切除率(26.4% vs. 23.3%,p=0.64)、二次手术率(4.4% vs. 1.1%,p=0.34)和成功的 BCS 率(93.4% vs. 94.4%,p=0.94)在不 shave 组和 shave 组之间均相似。乳房体积较大的患者 shave 组织的体积明显增加(p<0.01)。在 C-E 罩杯的患者中,不 shave 组和 shave 组的术中 MPR 分别为 16.7%和 0%(p=0.03),术后 MPR 分别为 22.0%和 0%(p=0.01)。在 A-B 罩杯的患者中,两组之间的 MPR 相似。导管原位癌成分的存在是切缘阳性的唯一决定因素。

结论

环周 shave 并不能显著降低 BCS 中的 MPR。其获益取决于 shave 组织的体积和乳房的大小。

试验注册

本试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册(NCT02648802)。

相似文献

1
Circumferential Shaving of the Cavity in Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.保乳手术中腔镜下环形切除:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Dec;26(13):4256-4263. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07725-w. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
2
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Cancer.一项关于乳腺癌切缘环切的随机对照试验。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 6;373(6):503-10. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504473. Epub 2015 May 30.
3
Excising Additional Margins at Initial Breast-Conserving Surgery (BCS) Reduces the Need for Re-excision in a Predominantly African American Population: A Report of a Randomized Prospective Study in a Public Hospital.在初次保乳手术(BCS)时切除额外切缘可减少以非裔美国人为主的人群再次手术切除的需求:一项公立医院随机前瞻性研究报告
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Feb;23(2):456-64. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4789-4. Epub 2015 Aug 8.
4
The Effect of Lumpectomy and Cavity Shave Margin Status on Recurrence and Survival in Breast-Conserving Surgery.保乳手术中肿瘤局部广泛切除术(腔镜下切除术)和切缘状态对复发和生存的影响。
Am Surg. 2023 Mar;89(3):424-433. doi: 10.1177/00031348211030464. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
5
Do All Positive Margins in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing a Partial Mastectomy Need to Be Resected?行保乳术的乳腺癌患者所有切缘阳性都需要再次切除吗?
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Jul;227(1):13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
6
Clinical Impact of Intraoperative Margin Assessment in Breast-Conserving Surgery With a Novel Pegulicianine Fluorescence-Guided System: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.新型派古利西宁荧光引导系统在保乳手术中术中切缘评估的临床影响:一项非随机对照试验
JAMA Surg. 2022 Jul 1;157(7):573-580. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.1075.
7
Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.超声引导下保乳手术后,切缘阳性患者的再次切除率较低。
Breast. 2013 Oct;22(5):698-702. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.12.019. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
8
The impact of intraoperative cavity shaving on re-excision rates in breast-conserving surgery.术中腔镜削刮对保乳手术再次切除率的影响。
J Surg Oncol. 2023 Mar;127(4):527-534. doi: 10.1002/jso.27149. Epub 2022 Nov 26.
9
Economic Impact of Routine Cavity Margins Versus Standard Partial Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.乳腺癌患者常规切缘与标准保乳手术的经济影响:一项随机对照试验的结果
Ann Surg. 2017 Jan;265(1):39-44. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001799.
10
Impact of systematic cavity shave margins in breast-conserving surgery at a large community hospital with a low baseline re-excision rate.在一个低基线再次切除率的大型社区医院中,保乳手术中系统性切缘空腔刮除的影响。
Breast J. 2020 Oct;26(10):1960-1965. doi: 10.1111/tbj.14057. Epub 2020 Oct 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of intraoperative margin optimization strategies compared to standard breast-conserving surgery on oncologic outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and prospective trials.与标准保乳手术相比,术中切缘优化策略对肿瘤学结局的影响:一项对随机和前瞻性试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug 27;23(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03959-z.
2
Intraoperative Supine Breast MRI for Residual Tumor Assessment after Breast-Conserving Therapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer.早期乳腺癌保乳治疗后术中仰卧位乳腺MRI用于残余肿瘤评估
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2025 Mar;7(2):e240158. doi: 10.1148/rycan.240158.
3
Does Nipple-Ward Positive Margin Contribute to a Higher Rate of Re-Excision Procedures After a Lumpectomy with Pathology-Confirmed Positive Margins? A Retrospective Study.
乳头切缘阳性是否会导致病理证实切缘阳性的乳房肿块切除术后再次切除手术的发生率更高?一项回顾性研究。
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2024 Feb 21;16:41-50. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S425863. eCollection 2024.
4
Positional advantages of supine MRI for diagnosis prior to breast‑conserving surgery.保乳手术前仰卧位MRI诊断的体位优势
Mol Clin Oncol. 2023 Apr 4;18(5):44. doi: 10.3892/mco.2023.2640. eCollection 2023 May.
5
Impact of cavity shaving on residual tumor rates in patients with primary invasive carcinoma and carcinoma in situ in breast conserving surgery.保乳手术中腔面削切对原发性浸润性癌和原位癌患者肿瘤残留率的影响。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 May;307(5):1573-1583. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06803-x. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
6
Quantitative Micro-Elastography Enables In Vivo Detection of Residual Cancer in the Surgical Cavity during Breast-Conserving Surgery.定量微弹性成像可在保乳手术中活体检测手术腔中的残留肿瘤。
Cancer Res. 2022 Nov 2;82(21):4093-4104. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-22-0578.
7
Does cavity margin shaving reduce residual tumor and re-excision rates? A systematic review.洞缘削切术能否降低残余肿瘤及再次切除率?一项系统综述。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Apr;307(4):1295-1309. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06512-5. Epub 2022 May 20.
8
Prognostic factors for residual occult disease in shave margins during partial mastectomy.保乳手术切缘中隐匿性疾病残留的预后因素。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Sep;189(2):471-481. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06282-9. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
9
A single-center, self-controlled, phase I clinical trial of mitoxantrone hydrochloride injection for lymph tracing for sentinel lymph node identification of breast cancer.一项关于盐酸米托蒽醌注射液用于乳腺癌前哨淋巴结识别的淋巴示踪单中心、自身对照、I期临床试验。
Gland Surg. 2021 Mar;10(3):992-1001. doi: 10.21037/gs-20-694.
10
Letter to the Editor: The Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Margin Re-excision in Breast-Conserving Surgery.致编辑的信:新辅助化疗对保乳手术切缘再次切除的影响
World J Surg. 2022 Jan;46(1):290-291. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06018-2. Epub 2021 Feb 26.