• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

奥斯陆医学项目中学生对讲座进行评估的系统。

A system for students' evaluation of lectures in the medical programme in Oslo.

作者信息

Stokke Sunneva, Solberg Ingeborg L, Grøttum Per, Lundin Knut E A, Heggen Kristin M, Breivik Jarle

出版信息

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2019 Aug 15;139(11). doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.19.0027. Print 2019 Aug 20.

DOI:10.4045/tidsskr.19.0027
PMID:31429231
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Students and education authorities are expressing an increasing demand for educational quality and student involvement in higher education. We present a descriptive observational study of a student-initiated system for evaluation of lectures in the medical degree programme at the University of Oslo.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Criteria-based student evaluations of 445 lectures in the first and second year of the medical degree programme were conducted in spring and autumn 2017 and spring 2018; after each lecture, three students completed a questionnaire about the lecture. The responses were sent by email to the lecturer on the same day. We performed an analysis of the evaluations, a group interview with the cohort's elected representatives, and a questionnaire survey among the lecturers who received an evaluation.

RESULTS

The lecturers received generally good feedback, but the student evaluations also indicated a clear potential for improvement: 21 % of the lectures were not adapted to the volume of information, 32 % did not point out the association with the learning outcomes, 31 % failed to activate the students and 40 % did not provide a summary at the end of the lecture. The cohort's elected representatives had a positive attitude to the evaluation scheme, but requested a simpler technical solution. Almost all the lecturers welcomed the student evaluation, and more than half had used the evaluations to improve their lectures.

INTERPRETATION

This quality development project shows how students, teachers, administration and management can collaborate to improve the teaching.

摘要

背景

学生和教育当局对高等教育的教育质量和学生参与度的要求日益提高。我们展示了一项关于奥斯陆大学医学学位课程中由学生发起的讲座评估系统的描述性观察研究。

材料与方法

在2017年春季和秋季以及2018年春季,对医学学位课程一、二年级的445场讲座进行了基于标准的学生评估;每场讲座后,三名学生填写一份关于该讲座的问卷。问卷回复于当天通过电子邮件发送给授课教师。我们对评估结果进行了分析,并与该班级选出的代表进行了小组访谈,还对收到评估的教师进行了问卷调查。

结果

教师总体上收到了良好的反馈,但学生评估也表明仍有明显的改进空间:21%的讲座未适配信息量,32%未指出与学习成果的关联,31%未能激发学生的积极性,40%在讲座结束时未进行总结。该班级选出的代表对评估方案持积极态度,但要求采用更简单的技术解决方案。几乎所有教师都欢迎学生评估,超过半数的教师已利用评估结果改进了他们的讲座。

解读

这个质量改进项目展示了学生、教师、行政人员和管理人员如何合作以改进教学。

相似文献

1
A system for students' evaluation of lectures in the medical programme in Oslo.奥斯陆医学项目中学生对讲座进行评估的系统。
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2019 Aug 15;139(11). doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.19.0027. Print 2019 Aug 20.
2
The effect of written standardized feedback on the structure and quality of surgical lectures: A prospective cohort study.书面标准化反馈对外科讲座结构和质量的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Nov 14;16(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0806-y.
3
Electronic voting to encourage interactive lectures: a randomised trial.电子投票促进互动式讲座:一项随机试验
BMC Med Educ. 2007 Jul 27;7:25. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-7-25.
4
The impact of lecture attendance and other variables on how medical students evaluate faculty in a preclinical program.讲座出勤和其他变量对医学生如何评估临床前课程教师的影响。
Acad Med. 2013 Jul;88(7):972-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318294e99a.
5
Evaluation of the undergraduate family medicine programme of Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya: quantitative and qualitative student feedback.对凯拉尼亚大学医学院本科家庭医学课程的评估:学生的定量和定性反馈。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Dec 2;19(1):444. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1882-6.
6
Exploring medical student decisions regarding attending live lectures and using recorded lectures.探讨医学生是否选择参加现场讲座和使用录制讲座。
Med Teach. 2013 Sep;35(9):767-71. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.801940. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
7
Effectiveness of team teaching in biochemistry lectures for undergraduate students.团队教学在生物化学讲座中对本科生的有效性。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2021 Jul;49(4):583-587. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21513. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
8
Medical student evaluation of faculty in student-preceptor pairs.医学生对师生配对中带教教师的评价。
Acad Med. 2007 Oct;82(10 Suppl):S30-3. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318141f575.
9
Audience-response systems for evaluation of pediatric lectures--comparison with a classic end-of-term online-based evaluation.用于评估儿科讲座的观众反应系统——与基于在线的经典期末评估的比较
GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2015 May 13;32(2):Doc18. doi: 10.3205/zma000960. eCollection 2015.
10
Development and implementation of a longitudinal students as teachers program: participant satisfaction and implications for medical student teaching and learning.一项纵向的学生作为教师项目的开发与实施:参与者满意度及其对医学生教学与学习的启示
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Jan 31;17(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0857-8.