A Cohort Comparison Analysis of Fixed Pressure Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Valves With Programmable Valves for Hydrocephalus Following Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND

Hydrocephalus after nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a common sequela that may require the placement of ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VPS). Adjustable-pressure valves (APVs) are being widely used in this situation though more expensive than differential-pressure valves (DPVs).

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes between APV and DPV in SAH-induced hydrocephalus.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with nontraumatic SAH who underwent VPS placement for the treatment of hydrocephalus after SAH, between July 2007 and December 2016. Patients were classified according to the type of valve (APV vs DPV). We evaluated factors that could predict the type of valve used, outcomes in VPS revision/replacement rate, and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 66 patients underwent VPS placement who were equally distributed into the 2 groups of valves. VPS failure with the need for revision/replacement occurred in 13 (19.7%) cases. Ten (30.3%) patients with DPV had a VPS failure, while 3 (9.1%) patients with an APV had a similar failure with the need for revision/replacement (P = .03). VPS placement before discharge during the initial hospitalization (P = .02) was statistically significant associated with the use of a DPV, while the reason of external ventricular drain (EVD) failure (P = .03) was associated with the use of an APV.

CONCLUSION

APVs had a lower rate of surgical revisions compared to DPVs. Early placement of VPS was associated with the use of a DPV. The need for EVD replacement due to EVD infection or malfunction was associated with higher rates of APV use.