Viana M O S, Vianna L M F F, Amaral F L B, França F M G, Turssi C P, Basting R T
São Leopoldo Mandic Institute and Dental Research Center.
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2019 Aug 29;27(3):103-112. doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_01907Viana10.
The purpose was to evaluate the influence of dentin pretreatment with titanium tetrafluoride (TiF₄) on the longevity of bond strength (BS) of an indirect composite to dentin, using conventional resin cementation strategy or a self-adhesive resin cement. Forty third human molars with exposed dentin surfaces were used. The teeth were divided into groups (n = 10), according to the cementation strategy and the presence or absence of pretreatment with TiF₄. Microtensile strength testing and failure mode analysis were performed after 24 hours, 180 and 360 days of storage in water. Split-plot ANOVA and Tukey's test showed that BS was significantly higher when the conventional strategy was used, regardless of the time period, and of the application or no application of pretreatment with TiF₄ (p ⟨0.0001). When TiF₄ was used for both cementing strategies, BS was lower after 360 days (p = 0.0019). Both cementing strategies led to the formation of a shallow hybrid layer, regardless of the presence of TiF₄. BS was higher when the conventional cementation strategy was used, regardless of TiF₄ pretreatment. TiF₄ used as a pretreatment agent associated with different types of resin cementation was unable to maintain adhesive bond strength in the long term.
本研究旨在评估使用传统树脂粘结策略或自粘结树脂水门汀时,四氟化钛(TiF₄)预处理牙本质对间接复合树脂与牙本质粘结强度(BS)持久性的影响。使用了40颗人第三磨牙,其牙本质表面暴露。根据粘结策略以及是否用TiF₄预处理,将牙齿分为几组(n = 10)。在水中储存24小时、180天和360天后,进行微拉伸强度测试和失效模式分析。裂区方差分析和Tukey检验表明,无论时间段以及是否应用TiF₄预处理,使用传统策略时BS均显著更高(p<0.0001)。当两种粘结策略都使用TiF₄时,360天后BS较低(p = 0.0019)。无论是否存在TiF₄,两种粘结策略均导致形成浅混合层。无论TiF₄预处理情况如何,使用传统粘结策略时BS更高。用作与不同类型树脂粘结相关的预处理剂的TiF₄,长期无法维持粘结强度。