Nashville Neuroscience Group, Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Cephalalgia. 2019 Oct;39(11):1343-1357. doi: 10.1177/0333102419864132. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
To address the need for long-term lasmiditan data, the GLADIATOR study evaluated the safety (primary) and efficacy (secondary) of lasmiditan for the intermittent, acute treatment of migraine attacks for up to 1 year.
In this prospective, randomized, open-label, Phase 3 study, patients who had completed either of two single-attack studies were offered the opportunity to be randomized 1:1 to lasmiditan 100 mg or 200 mg. Patients were asked to use lasmiditan as the first treatment for each new migraine attack of at least moderate severity. Assessments occurred at baseline and at prespecified time increments up to 48 hours after each dose of study drug using an electronic diary, and safety was assessed throughout the study. Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) was assessed at each visit.
As of the cut-off date for this interim analysis (6 March 2018), 1978 patients had received ≥ 1 lasmiditan dose and treated 19,058 migraine attacks. Overall, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were similar to those in the single-attack studies and included dizziness (18.6%), somnolence (8.5%), and paresthesia (6.8%). The frequency of TEAEs generally decreased with subsequent attacks. No treatment-related serious adverse events and no cardiovascular TEAEs potentially due to vasoconstriction were observed. For both lasmiditan doses, efficacy measures were generally consistent over study quarters and treated attacks. Overall, across all treated attacks at 2 hours post-dose, pain freedom was observed in 26.9% of the attacks treated with lasmiditan 100 mg and 32.4% of the attacks treated with lasmiditan 200 mg. MIDAS total scores decreased over time.
The interim results of this long-term study showed intermittent lasmiditan (100 mg and 200 mg) to be generally well tolerated and efficacious for the acute treatment of migraine over a 1-year period. NCT02565186; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02565186.
为了满足长期利扎曲坦数据的需求,GLADIATOR 研究评估了利扎曲坦间歇性、急性治疗偏头痛发作的安全性(主要)和疗效(次要),治疗时间长达 1 年。
在这项前瞻性、随机、开放标签、3 期研究中,完成了两项单发作研究的患者有机会被随机分为 1:1 组,分别接受利扎曲坦 100mg 或 200mg 治疗。要求患者在偏头痛发作至少达到中度严重程度时,将利扎曲坦作为首次治疗。在每次服用研究药物后,使用电子日记在预设时间间隔进行基线和 48 小时内的评估,整个研究期间评估安全性。每次就诊时都评估偏头痛残疾评估(MIDAS)。
截至本次中期分析截止日期(2018 年 3 月 6 日),1978 名患者接受了≥1 次利扎曲坦治疗,治疗了 19058 次偏头痛发作。总体而言,治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAEs)与单发作研究中的不良事件相似,包括头晕(18.6%)、嗜睡(8.5%)和感觉异常(6.8%)。TEAEs 的发生频率通常随着后续发作而降低。未观察到与治疗相关的严重不良事件和潜在的血管收缩引起的心血管 TEAEs。对于利扎曲坦两种剂量,在研究季度和治疗发作中,疗效指标通常一致。总体而言,在给药后 2 小时,接受利扎曲坦 100mg 治疗的发作中有 26.9%的发作疼痛缓解,接受利扎曲坦 200mg 治疗的发作中有 32.4%的发作疼痛缓解。MIDAS 总分随时间降低。
这项长期研究的中期结果表明,间歇性利扎曲坦(100mg 和 200mg)在 1 年内治疗偏头痛急性发作时通常具有良好的耐受性和疗效。NCT02565186;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02565186。