Stewart-Brown S L, Haslum M
Department of Community Medicine, Southmead Hospital, Bristol.
BMJ. 1988 Oct 29;297(6656):1111-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6656.1111.
Assessment of vision in schoolchildren is routinely performed, but the effectiveness of the screening programmes has not been reviewed. A survey of health district screening programmes for vision in schools was performed at the end of 1984. The response rate from districts in England and Wales was 81%. All 165 of the districts that responded screened for loss of distant visual acuity; 96% screened for loss of colour vision, 73% for squint, and 67% for loss of near visual acuity. The frequency with which districts screened varied considerably. Some districts screened yearly, and various different types of tests were used. In many districts children were screened in unsuitable places, such as corridors, assembly halls, and toilets. Criteria for referral varied from one district to another, and few districts collected data appropriate for monitoring their screening programmes. Many districts screened more intensively than could be justified on the basis of the conditions tested for and the likely benefit of remedial treatment.
对学童视力的评估是常规进行的,但筛查项目的有效性尚未得到评估。1984年底对各健康区的学校视力筛查项目进行了一项调查。英格兰和威尔士各地区的回复率为81%。所有165个回复的地区都对远视力丧失进行了筛查;96%的地区筛查了色觉丧失,73%的地区筛查了斜视,67%的地区筛查了近视力丧失。各地区筛查的频率差异很大。一些地区每年进行筛查,并且使用了各种不同类型的测试。在许多地区,孩子们在不合适的地方接受筛查,比如走廊、礼堂和厕所。转诊标准因地区而异,很少有地区收集适合监测其筛查项目的数据。许多地区的筛查力度超过了根据所检测的情况和矫正治疗可能带来的益处所合理应有的程度。