Polesello Giancarlo Cavalli, Queiroz Marcelo Cavalheiro, Junior Walter Ricioli, Rudelli Marco, Nunes Marcus Aurelius Araújo, Amaral Denise Tokechi
Grupo de Quadril, Departamento de ortopedia e Traumatologia, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo (FCMSCSP), Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericórdia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Serviço de Radiologia, Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2019 Jul;54(4):428-433. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1693044. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
The purpose of the present paper is to compare the equivalence of the measurement of the alpha angle using the Ducroquet and cross-table lateral views. We have recruited 90 patients, resulting in 95 hips. We have standardized the realization of the radiographic views. The incidence of the lateral cross-table views were taken with 15° of internal rotation with the patient in the supine position, and the incidence of the Ducroquet views was standardized with the patient in the supine position, with 90° of flexion and 45° of abduction of the hip. The alpha angle was measured in both lateral views, by two musculoskeletal radiologists. The measurements were performed in 2 different times: an initial evaluation and another 4 weeks afterwards. The t Student test was used and calculated the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). We have found a good intraobserver correlation for both views in different times; there was no statistically significant difference between the measurements performed by the two views. However, the interobserver correlation was low. In conclusion, the Ducroquet profile view is a good choice for the α angle measurement and can be used instead of the cross-table view.
本文的目的是比较使用杜克罗凯视图(Ducroquet view)和交叉台面侧位视图测量α角的等效性。我们招募了90名患者,共得到95个髋关节。我们对X线片视图的拍摄进行了标准化。交叉台面侧位视图的拍摄是让患者仰卧位,髋关节内旋15°;杜克罗凯视图的拍摄是让患者仰卧位,髋关节屈曲90°、外展45°,并对其进行了标准化。由两位肌肉骨骼放射科医生在两种侧位视图上测量α角。测量在两个不同时间进行:初始评估以及4周后。使用t检验并计算组内相关系数(ICC)。我们发现在不同时间两种视图的观察者内相关性良好;两种视图测量结果之间无统计学显著差异。然而,观察者间相关性较低。总之,杜克罗凯轮廓视图是测量α角的一个不错选择,可替代交叉台面视图使用。