• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者和医生对重度哮喘生物制剂属性的偏好。

Patient and physician preferences for attributes of biologic medications for severe asthma.

作者信息

Gelhorn Heather L, Balantac Zaneta, Ambrose Christopher S, Chung Yen N, Stone Brian

机构信息

Evidera, Bethesda, MD, USA.

AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Jul 25;13:1253-1268. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S198953. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.2147/PPA.S198953
PMID:31440040
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6667349/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Despite the increased availability of biologic treatments indicated for severe asthma, patient and physician preferences for these medications remains largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to understand perceptions of biologic therapies, barriers to care with biologic medications, and preferences for biologic therapy attributes.

METHODS

This mixed-methods study involved quantitative surveys and qualitative telephone interviews with patients and physicians from the United States. Participants described preferences for relevant attributes, and barriers to use of biologic medications. Participants rated, ranked, and indicated importance of preferences for different levels of key attributes including: mode of administration, administration setting, dosing frequency, number of injections, and time to onset of effect. Other attributes unique to each group were also included.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients and 25 physicians participated. Patients ranked out-of-pocket costs, mode of administration, time to onset of efficacy, and administration setting as the most important attributes. Physicians ranked mode of administration, time to onset of efficacy, dosing frequency, and insurance reimbursement/access as most important. Both groups expressed preferences for less frequent administrations (Q8W over Q4W or Q2W) (all <0.01) and subcutaneous (SC) over intravenous injection (both <0.0001). Key patient barriers to biologic medications include location of treatment, administration time, scheduling, cost/insurance coverage, number of injections, and mode of administration. Physicians identified patient candidacy, convincing patients, administration setting, mode of administration, cost, and administrative burden as key barriers to initiating therapy; and efficacy, speed of onset, convenience of administration, cost, and patient compliance as barriers to staying on therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients and physicians expressed strong preferences for less frequent dosing, SC administration, and faster onset. Cost/insurance coverage and convenience issues were key barriers to use. Increased awareness and understanding of preferences and barriers may be useful in facilitating physician-patient conversations with the goal of individualizing treatment.

摘要

目的

尽管用于重度哮喘的生物制剂治疗方法越来越多,但患者和医生对这些药物的偏好仍 largely 未知。本研究的目的是了解对生物疗法的看法、使用生物药物治疗的障碍以及对生物疗法属性的偏好。

方法

这项混合方法研究涉及对来自美国的患者和医生进行定量调查和定性电话访谈。参与者描述了对相关属性的偏好以及使用生物药物的障碍。参与者对不同水平的关键属性的偏好进行评分、排序并指出其重要性,这些关键属性包括:给药方式、给药地点、给药频率、注射次数和起效时间。还包括了每组特有的其他属性。

结果

共有47名患者和25名医生参与。患者将自付费用、给药方式、起效时间和给药地点列为最重要的属性。医生将给药方式、起效时间、给药频率和保险报销/可及性列为最重要的。两组都表示更倾向于给药频率较低(每8周一次优于每4周或每2周一次)(均<0.01)以及皮下注射(SC)优于静脉注射(均<0.0001)。患者使用生物药物的主要障碍包括治疗地点、给药时间、安排、费用/保险覆盖范围、注射次数和给药方式。医生认为患者的候选资格、说服患者、给药地点、给药方式、费用和管理负担是开始治疗的关键障碍;而疗效、起效速度、给药便利性、费用和患者依从性是持续治疗的障碍。

结论

患者和医生都强烈倾向于给药频率较低、皮下给药和起效更快。费用/保险覆盖范围和便利性问题是使用的关键障碍。提高对偏好和障碍的认识和理解可能有助于促进医患对话,以实现治疗个体化的目标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2207/6667349/1b997dbfd75b/PPA-13-1253-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2207/6667349/580c3e8d26ba/PPA-13-1253-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2207/6667349/609350e39d2a/PPA-13-1253-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2207/6667349/be668e78bd97/PPA-13-1253-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2207/6667349/1b997dbfd75b/PPA-13-1253-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2207/6667349/580c3e8d26ba/PPA-13-1253-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2207/6667349/609350e39d2a/PPA-13-1253-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2207/6667349/be668e78bd97/PPA-13-1253-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2207/6667349/1b997dbfd75b/PPA-13-1253-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient and physician preferences for attributes of biologic medications for severe asthma.患者和医生对重度哮喘生物制剂属性的偏好。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Jul 25;13:1253-1268. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S198953. eCollection 2019.
2
Patient Preferences for Attributes of Biologic Treatments in Moderate to Severe Asthma: A Discrete Choice Experiment Study.中度至重度哮喘患者对生物治疗属性的偏好:一项离散选择实验研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Sep 23;16:2649-2661. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S365117. eCollection 2022.
3
Patient preferences for attributes of injected or infused preventive migraine medications: Findings from a discrete choice experiment.偏头痛预防性注射或输注药物属性的患者偏好:离散选择实验的结果
Headache. 2023 Apr;63(4):484-493. doi: 10.1111/head.14476. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
4
An evaluation of patients' preferences for osteoporosis medications and their attributes: the PREFER-International study.患者对骨质疏松症药物及其属性的偏好评估:PREFER-国际研究
Clin Ther. 2007 Mar;29(3):488-503. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(07)80087-7.
5
Patient and clinician preferences for biologic treatments for severe uncontrolled asthma: a discrete choice experiment (DCE).患者和临床医生对严重未控制哮喘的生物治疗的偏好:一项离散选择实验 (DCE)。
J Asthma. 2024 Dec;61(12):1746-1758. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2024.2380520. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
6
Exploring Perceptions of Biologic Therapies: A Qualitative Study Among Canadians Living with Severe Asthma.探索生物疗法的认知:加拿大严重哮喘患者定性研究。
Adv Ther. 2024 Apr;41(4):1401-1418. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02803-2. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
7
Patient preferences for preventive migraine treatments among Canadian adults: A discrete choice experiment.加拿大成年人对预防性偏头痛治疗的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Headache. 2025 Jan;65(1):113-123. doi: 10.1111/head.14781. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
8
Analysis of physicians' perspectives versus patients' preferences: direct assessment and discrete choice experiments in the therapy of multiple myeloma.分析医生观点与患者偏好:多发性骨髓瘤治疗中的直接评估和离散选择实验。
Eur J Health Econ. 2011 Jun;12(3):193-203. doi: 10.1007/s10198-010-0218-6. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
9
Openness to and preference for attributes of biologic therapy prior to initiation among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: patient and rheumatologist perspectives and implications for decision making.类风湿关节炎患者在开始生物治疗之前对生物治疗属性的接受程度和偏好:患者和风湿病学家的观点及对决策的影响
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Jun 16;10:1079-90. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S107790. eCollection 2016.
10
Patient preference for biologic treatments of psoriasis in Japan.日本银屑病患者对生物疗法的偏好。
J Dermatol. 2019 Jun;46(6):466-477. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.14870. Epub 2019 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Targeted Biologic Therapies in Severe Asthma: Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Clinical Applications.重度哮喘的靶向生物疗法:作用机制、生物标志物及临床应用
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Jul 10;18(7):1021. doi: 10.3390/ph18071021.
2
Understanding Psoriasis Patient Preferences for Biologic Dosing Frequencies: Insights From a Patient Survey.了解银屑病患者对生物制剂给药频率的偏好:来自患者调查的见解。
J Psoriasis Psoriatic Arthritis. 2025 Jun 2:24755303251345804. doi: 10.1177/24755303251345804.
3
Preferences for Biologic Treatments: A Discrete Choice Experiment Survey of Canadians with Severe Asthma.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of inhaled corticosteroids use and associated factors among asthmatic patients attending Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚提库尔·安贝萨专科医院哮喘患者吸入性糖皮质激素使用情况及其相关因素评估。
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Jul 25;10(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2645-2.
2
Benefit-risk trade-offs for treatment decisions in moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis: focus on the patient perspective.中重度类风湿关节炎治疗决策的获益-风险权衡:关注患者视角。
Rheumatol Int. 2017 Sep;37(9):1423-1434. doi: 10.1007/s00296-017-3760-z. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
3
Subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of trastuzumab: preference of HER2+ breast cancer patients and financial impact of its use.
生物治疗的偏好:一项针对加拿大重度哮喘患者的离散选择实验调查
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 May 22;19:1509-1522. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S512755. eCollection 2025.
4
Disease Impact and Perception of Biologics in Adults with Type 2 Inflammation Respiratory Disease: International Survey Results.2型炎症性呼吸道疾病成人患者中疾病影响及对生物制剂的认知:国际调查结果
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Apr 28;19:1159-1170. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S517466. eCollection 2025.
5
Real-World Biologic Use Patterns in Severe Asthma, 2015-2021: The CLEAR Study.2015 - 2021年重度哮喘的真实世界生物制剂使用模式:CLEAR研究
Pragmat Obs Res. 2025 Mar 18;16:51-66. doi: 10.2147/POR.S497033. eCollection 2025.
6
Pharmacokinetics of Depemokimab Delivered by Safety Syringe Device or Autoinjector in Healthy Adults: A Phase 1, Single-Dose Study.安全注射器装置或自动注射器给药的地培莫单抗在健康成年人中的药代动力学:一项1期单剂量研究。
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2025 Mar;14(3):190-199. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.1506. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
7
Biologics in T2 Severe Asthma: Unveiling Different Effectiveness by Real-World Indirect Comparison.2型重度哮喘中的生物制剂:通过真实世界间接比较揭示不同疗效
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 13;13(16):4750. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164750.
8
Race and ethnicity, not just insurance, is associated with biologics initiation in asthma and related conditions.种族和族裔,而非仅仅保险因素,与哮喘及相关病症中生物制剂的起始使用有关。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2025 Mar;155(3):1036-1044. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2024.08.001. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
9
Preference for a Novel Oral Alternative to Parenterally Administered Medications.相比于胃肠外给药,对新型口服替代药物的偏好。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Jul 30;18:1547-1562. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S463354. eCollection 2024.
10
Geographic and economic influences on benralizumab prescribing for severe asthma in Japan.地理和经济因素对日本重度哮喘患者贝那鲁肽单抗处方的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 2;14(1):15190. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65407-4.
曲妥珠单抗皮下注射与静脉注射:HER2+乳腺癌患者的偏好及其使用的财务影响
J BUON. 2017 Mar-Apr;22(2):334-339.
4
Assessing gastroenterologist and patient acceptance of biosimilars in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease across Germany.评估德国各地胃肠病学家和患者对溃疡性结肠炎和克罗恩病生物类似药的接受度。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 14;12(4):e0175826. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175826. eCollection 2017.
5
Patient experience with intravenous biologic therapies for ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn's disease, psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, and ulcerative colitis.强直性脊柱炎、克罗恩病、银屑病关节炎、银屑病、类风湿关节炎和溃疡性结肠炎患者接受静脉注射生物疗法的体验。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Mar 28;11:661-669. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S121032. eCollection 2017.
6
Patient Preference for Dosing Frequency Based on Prior Biologic Experience.基于既往生物制剂使用经验的患者对给药频率的偏好
J Drugs Dermatol. 2017 Mar 1;16(3):220-226.
7
A Canadian perspective on the subcutaneous administration of rituximab in non-Hodgkin lymphoma.加拿大对利妥昔单抗皮下注射治疗非霍奇金淋巴瘤的观点。
Curr Oncol. 2017 Feb;24(1):33-39. doi: 10.3747/co.24.3470. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
8
Are abatacept and tocilizumab intravenous users willing to switch for the subcutaneous route of administration? A questionnaire-based study.使用阿巴西普和托珠单抗静脉注射的患者愿意改用皮下注射给药途径吗?一项基于问卷调查的研究。
Clin Rheumatol. 2017 Jun;36(6):1395-1400. doi: 10.1007/s10067-017-3587-8. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
9
Treatment preferences for biologicals in psoriasis: experienced patients appreciate sustainability.银屑病生物制剂的治疗偏好:有经验的患者看重可持续性。
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2017 Feb;15(2):189-200. doi: 10.1111/ddg.12919.
10
Therapeutic interventions in severe asthma.重度哮喘的治疗干预措施。
World Allergy Organ J. 2016 Nov 28;9(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s40413-016-0130-3. eCollection 2016.