• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大规模伤亡事件中的医疗记录保存:灾难医疗记录的制定

Medical record keeping during a mass casualty incident: Development of a disaster medical record.

作者信息

Koning Salomon Willem, Haverkort Mark J J, Leenen Luke P H

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Major Incident Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, Major Incident Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Am J Disaster Med. 2019;14(1):9-15. doi: 10.5055/ajdm.2019.0311.

DOI:10.5055/ajdm.2019.0311
PMID:31441024
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Improve documentation during a mass casualty incident (MCI).

DESIGN

This is a retrospective chart review.

SETTING

This chart review was done in the Major Incident Hospital (MIH). The MIH is a highly prepared back-up hospital in the center of the Netherland that can be deployed in case of a major incident.

PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: Until recently, the MIH used an extensive paper medical record: the hospital in special circumstances medical record (HSCMR). A concise primary survey form was developed and attached to the HSCMR, forming the pilot disaster medical record (pDMR). In this retrospective chart review, primary survey data documented in the HSCMR (during a MCI) were compared to the pDMR (during a drill exercise). Three triage categories were used: T1, immediate; T2, urgent; and T3, delayed.

MAIN OUTCOME

The MIH hypothesized that a dedicated, concise, and practical primary survey form could improve quantitative patient documentation during an MCI. Significant differences were tested with the chi square and Fisher exact test (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

The pDMR was used significantly more often 61 percent vs 89 percent (p = 0.001), especially in T1 and T2 patients. Quantitative documentation in the pDMR improved significantly on airway, breathing, breathing frequency, saturation, circulation, heart rate, blood pressure, Glasgow Coma Score, exposure, and medication given but not in cervical spine and temperature.

CONCLUSION

Significantly more primary survey forms were used and more data were documented using the pDMR, especially in the most critical patients. An MCI medical record should be simple and concise and should not deviate from daily routine.

摘要

目的

改善大规模伤亡事件(MCI)期间的文档记录。

设计

这是一项回顾性图表审查。

地点

该图表审查在重大事件医院(MIH)进行。MIH是荷兰中部一家高度戒备的后备医院,可在重大事件发生时进行部署。

患者、参与者:直到最近,MIH使用的是一份详尽的纸质病历:特殊情况医院病历(HSCMR)。现已制定了一份简明的初步检查表,并附在HSCMR上,形成了试点灾难病历(pDMR)。在这项回顾性图表审查中,将HSCMR中记录的(在MCI期间)初步检查数据与pDMR(在演练期间)进行了比较。使用了三种分诊类别:T1,即刻;T2,紧急;T3,延迟。

主要结果

MIH假设,一份专门、简明且实用的初步检查表可改善MCI期间患者的定量文档记录。采用卡方检验和Fisher精确检验来检验显著差异(p<0.05)。

结果

pDMR的使用频率显著更高,分别为61%和89%(p=0.001),尤其是在T1和T2类患者中。pDMR在气道、呼吸、呼吸频率、血氧饱和度、循环、心率、血压、格拉斯哥昏迷评分、暴露情况和用药方面的定量记录有显著改善,但在颈椎和体温方面没有改善。

结论

使用pDMR时,初步检查表的使用显著增多,记录的数据也更多,尤其是在最危急的患者中。MCI病历应简单明了,不应偏离日常常规。

相似文献

1
Medical record keeping during a mass casualty incident: Development of a disaster medical record.大规模伤亡事件中的医疗记录保存:灾难医疗记录的制定
Am J Disaster Med. 2019;14(1):9-15. doi: 10.5055/ajdm.2019.0311.
2
Comparison of Electronic Versus Manual Mass-Casualty Incident Triage.电子与人工批量伤亡事件分诊的比较
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018 Jun;33(3):273-278. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X1800033X. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
3
Impact of wireless electronic medical record system on the quality of patient documentation by emergency field responders during a disaster mass-casualty exercise.无线电子病历系统对灾难大规模伤亡演习期间应急现场救援人员患者文档记录质量的影响。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2011 Aug;26(4):268-75. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X11006480. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
4
The Use of Field Triage in Disaster and Mass Casualty Incidents: A Survey of Current Practices by EMS Personnel.灾难和大规模伤亡事件中的现场分诊应用:急救医疗服务人员当前实践的调查
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018 Jul-Aug;22(4):520-526. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2017.1419323. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
5
Comparison of Computerized Patients versus Live Moulaged Actors for a Mass-casualty Drill.在大规模伤员救治演练中,计算机模拟患者与真人模拟演员的比较。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015 Oct;30(5):438-42. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X15004963. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
6
First Responder Accuracy Using SALT during Mass-casualty Incident Simulation.在大规模伤亡事件模拟中使用SALT时急救人员的准确性。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Apr;31(2):150-4. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16000091. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
7
Attitudes Towards and Experience of the Use of Triage Tags in Major Incidents: A Mixed Method Study.重大事件中对使用分诊标签的态度与体验:一项混合方法研究
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Aug;31(4):376-85. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16000480. Epub 2016 May 23.
8
Indoor fire in a nursing home: evaluation of the medical response to a mass casualty incident based on a standardized protocol.养老院室内火灾:基于标准化预案对大规模伤亡事件医疗应对措施的评估
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015 Apr;41(2):167-78. doi: 10.1007/s00068-014-0446-z. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
9
Randomized trial comparing two mass casualty triage systems (JumpSTART versus SALT) in a pediatric simulated mass casualty event.在儿科模拟大规模伤亡事件中比较两种大规模伤亡分诊系统(JumpSTART与SALT)的随机试验。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3):417-23. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2014.882997. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
10
Hospital evacuation: Exercise versus reality.医院疏散:演习与现实
Injury. 2016 Sep;47(9):2012-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.03.028. Epub 2016 Mar 30.

引用本文的文献

1
The Emergency Medical Team Operating System - a vision for field hospital data management in following the concepts of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine.紧急医疗团队操作系统——遵循预测性、预防性和个性化医疗理念的野战医院数据管理愿景。
EPMA J. 2024 Apr 22;15(2):405-413. doi: 10.1007/s13167-024-00361-9. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
The Emergency Medical Team Operating System: design, implementation, and evaluation of a field hospital information management system.应急医疗队操作系统:野战医院信息管理系统的设计、实施与评估
JAMIA Open. 2022 Dec 24;5(4):ooac106. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac106. eCollection 2022 Dec.