Lyzwinski Lynnette Nathalie, Edirippulige Sisira, Caffery Liam, Bambling Matthew
Centre for Online Health, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Wooloongabba, Australia.
JMIR Ment Health. 2019 Aug 22;6(8):e12820. doi: 10.2196/12820.
BACKGROUND: Mindful eating is an emerging area of research for managing unhealthy eating and weight-related behaviors such as binge eating and emotional eating. Although there are numerous commercial mindful eating apps available, their quality, effectiveness, and whether they are accurately based on mindfulness-based eating awareness are unknown. OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to appraise the quality of the mindful eating apps and to appraise the quality of content on mindful eating apps. METHODS: A review of mindful eating apps available on Apple iTunes was undertaken from March to April 2018. Relevant apps meeting the inclusion criteria were subjectively appraised for general app quality using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) guidelines and for the quality of content on mindful eating. A total of 22 apps met the inclusion criteria and were appraised. RESULTS: Many of the reviewed apps were assessed as functional and had moderate scores in aesthetics based on the criteria in the MARS assessment. However, some received lower scores in the domains of information and engagement. The majority of the apps did not teach users how to eat mindfully using all five senses. Hence, they were scored as incomplete in accurately providing mindfulness-based eating awareness. Instead, most apps were either eating timers, hunger rating apps, or diaries. Areas of potential improvement were in comprehensiveness and diversity of media, in the quantity and quality of information, and in the inclusion of privacy and security policies. To truly teach mindful eating, the apps need to provide guided examples involving the five senses beyond simply timing eating or writing in a diary. They also need to include eating meditations to assist people with their disordered eating such as binge eating, fullness, satiety, and craving meditations that may help them with coping when experiencing difficulties. They should also have engaging and entertaining features delivered through diverse media to ensure sustained use and interest by consumers. CONCLUSIONS: Future mindful eating apps could be improved by accurate adherence to mindful eating. Further improvement could be achieved by ameliorating the domains of information, engagement, and aesthetics and having adequate privacy policies.
背景:正念饮食是管理不健康饮食及与体重相关行为(如暴饮暴食和情绪化进食)的一个新兴研究领域。尽管有众多商业正念饮食应用程序可供使用,但其质量、有效性以及是否准确基于正念饮食意识尚不清楚。 目的:本综述旨在评估正念饮食应用程序的质量以及正念饮食应用程序上的内容质量。 方法:2018年3月至4月对苹果iTunes上的正念饮食应用程序进行了综述。使用移动应用评分量表(MARS)指南对符合纳入标准的相关应用程序的一般应用质量以及正念饮食内容质量进行主观评估。共有22个应用程序符合纳入标准并接受了评估。 结果:根据MARS评估标准,许多被审查的应用程序被评估为功能正常,在美学方面得分中等。然而,一些应用程序在信息和参与度方面得分较低。大多数应用程序没有教用户如何运用所有五种感官进行正念饮食。因此,它们在准确提供基于正念的饮食意识方面得分不完整。相反,大多数应用程序要么是饮食定时器、饥饿评分应用程序,要么是日记。潜在的改进领域包括媒体的全面性和多样性、信息的数量和质量以及隐私和安全政策的纳入。为了真正教授正念饮食,应用程序需要提供涉及五种感官的引导示例,而不仅仅是记录饮食时间或写日记。它们还需要包括饮食冥想,以帮助人们应对饮食失调问题,如暴饮暴食、饱腹感、满足感和渴望冥想,这可能有助于他们在遇到困难时进行应对。它们还应该通过多种媒体提供引人入胜和有趣的功能,以确保消费者持续使用并保持兴趣。 结论:未来的正念饮食应用程序可以通过准确遵循正念饮食来改进。通过改善信息、参与度和美学领域以及制定适当的隐私政策,可以实现进一步的改进。
JMIR Ment Health. 2019-8-22
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015-8-19
J Med Internet Res. 2015-8-17
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2024-1
Curr Oncol. 2023-7-25
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020-10-26
J Telemed Telecare. 2017-2-9
Clin Med (Lond). 2015-12
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015-11-4
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015-8-19
J Med Internet Res. 2015-8-17