• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关注手机中的正念应用:欧洲应用商店中正念应用的系统评价与标准化评级

Stay Present with Your Phone: A Systematic Review and Standardized Rating of Mindfulness Apps in European App Stores.

作者信息

Schultchen Dana, Terhorst Yannik, Holderied Tanja, Stach Michael, Messner Eva-Maria, Baumeister Harald, Sander Lasse B

机构信息

Clinical and Health Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 41, Ulm, Germany.

Research Methods, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 47, Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Behav Med. 2021 Oct;28(5):552-560. doi: 10.1007/s12529-020-09944-y. Epub 2020 Nov 20.

DOI:10.1007/s12529-020-09944-y
PMID:33215348
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8384800/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mindfulness-based interventions show positive effects on physical and mental health. For a better integration of mindfulness techniques in daily life, the use of apps may be promising. However, only a few studies have examined the quality of mindfulness apps using a validated standardized instrument. This review aims to evaluate the content, quality, and privacy features of mindfulness-focused apps from European commercial app stores.

METHODS

An automated search engine (webcrawler) was used to identify mindfulness-focused apps in the European Apple App- and Google Play store. Content, quality, and privacy features were evaluated by two independent reviewers using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS). The MARS assesses the subscales engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information quality.

RESULTS

Out of 605 identified apps, 192 met the inclusion criteria. The overall quality was moderate (M = 3.66, SD = 0.48). Seven apps were tested in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Most of the apps showed a lack of data security and no privacy policy. The five apps with the highest ratings are from a credible source, include a privacy policy, and are also based on standardized mindfulness and behavior change techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

The plethora of often low-quality apps in commercial app stores makes it difficult for users to identify a suitable app. Above that, the lack of scientific verification of effectiveness and shortcomings in privacy protection and security poses potential risks. So far, the potential of mindfulness-focused apps is not exploited in commercial app stores.

摘要

背景

基于正念的干预措施对身心健康有积极影响。为了更好地将正念技巧融入日常生活,使用应用程序可能是一个有前景的方法。然而,只有少数研究使用经过验证的标准化工具来评估正念应用程序的质量。本综述旨在评估欧洲商业应用商店中专注于正念的应用程序的内容、质量和隐私功能。

方法

使用自动搜索引擎(网络爬虫)在欧洲苹果应用商店和谷歌Play商店中识别专注于正念的应用程序。两名独立评审员使用移动应用程序评分量表(MARS)对内容、质量和隐私功能进行评估。MARS评估参与度、功能、美学和信息质量等子量表。

结果

在识别出的605个应用程序中,192个符合纳入标准。总体质量中等(M = 3.66,标准差 = 0.48)。七个应用程序在随机对照试验(RCT)中进行了测试。大多数应用程序显示缺乏数据安全性且没有隐私政策。评分最高的五个应用程序来自可靠来源,包括隐私政策,并且还基于标准化的正念和行为改变技术。

结论

商业应用商店中大量质量往往较低的应用程序使用户难以识别合适的应用程序。除此之外,缺乏有效性的科学验证以及隐私保护和安全性方面的缺陷带来了潜在风险。到目前为止,商业应用商店中尚未充分利用专注于正念的应用程序的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d05b/8384800/6bf0e204f6f3/12529_2020_9944_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d05b/8384800/691763b4a833/12529_2020_9944_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d05b/8384800/6bf0e204f6f3/12529_2020_9944_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d05b/8384800/691763b4a833/12529_2020_9944_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d05b/8384800/6bf0e204f6f3/12529_2020_9944_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Stay Present with Your Phone: A Systematic Review and Standardized Rating of Mindfulness Apps in European App Stores.关注手机中的正念应用:欧洲应用商店中正念应用的系统评价与标准化评级
Int J Behav Med. 2021 Oct;28(5):552-560. doi: 10.1007/s12529-020-09944-y. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
2
Quality of Physical Activity Apps: Systematic Search in App Stores and Content Analysis.体育活动类应用程序质量:应用商店的系统搜索和内容分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 9;9(6):e22587. doi: 10.2196/22587.
3
Systematic evaluation of content and quality of English and German pain apps in European app stores.欧洲应用商店中英语和德语疼痛类应用程序的内容与质量的系统评估。
Internet Interv. 2021 Feb 24;24:100376. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100376. eCollection 2021 Apr.
4
Popular Evidence-Based Commercial Mental Health Apps: Analysis of Engagement, Functionality, Aesthetics, and Information Quality.流行的循证商业心理健康应用程序:参与度、功能、美学和信息质量分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jul 14;9(7):e29689. doi: 10.2196/29689.
5
Stress Management Apps: Systematic Search and Multidimensional Assessment of Quality and Characteristics.压力管理应用程序:系统搜索与质量和特征的多维评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Aug 29;11:e42415. doi: 10.2196/42415.
6
Mobile Phone Apps for Food Allergies or Intolerances in App Stores: Systematic Search and Quality Assessment Using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS).应用商店中针对食物过敏或不耐受的手机应用程序:使用移动应用评级量表(MARS)进行系统搜索和质量评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Sep 16;8(9):e18339. doi: 10.2196/18339.
7
Quality, Features, and Presence of Behavior Change Techniques in Mobile Apps Designed to Improve Physical Activity in Pregnant Women: Systematic Search and Content Analysis.旨在改善孕妇身体活动的移动应用程序中行为改变技术的质量、特征和存在:系统搜索和内容分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Apr 7;9(4):e23649. doi: 10.2196/23649.
8
Review and Evaluation of Mindfulness-Based iPhone Apps.正念为基础的 iPhone 应用程序的回顾与评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Aug 19;3(3):e82. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4328.
9
Apps to improve diet, physical activity and sedentary behaviour in children and adolescents: a review of quality, features and behaviour change techniques.改善儿童和青少年饮食、身体活动及久坐行为的应用程序:质量、功能及行为改变技巧综述
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Jun 24;14(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0538-3.
10
Mental Health Mobile Apps in the French App Store: Assessment Study of Functionality and Quality.法国应用商店中的心理健康移动应用程序:功能和质量评估研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Oct 12;10(10):e41282. doi: 10.2196/41282.

引用本文的文献

1
Dose-response effects of reported meditation practice on mental-health and wellbeing: A prospective longitudinal study.报告的冥想练习对心理健康和幸福感的剂量反应效应:一项前瞻性纵向研究。
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2025 Aug;17(4):e70063. doi: 10.1111/aphw.70063.
2
The Mindful Way From Information to Knowledge, to Wisdom, and to Life: Perspectives on Mindfulness (-Based Cognitive Therapy) for Higher Education.从信息到知识、到智慧、再到生活的正念之道:高等教育中的正念(认知行为疗法)视角
Mindfulness (N Y). 2025;16(4):846-863. doi: 10.1007/s12671-025-02528-5. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
3
A New Mobile App to Train Attention Processes in People With Traumatic Brain Injury: Logical and Ecological Content Validation Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Deriving a practical framework for the evaluation of health apps.推导一个用于评估健康应用程序的实用框架。
Lancet Digit Health. 2019 Jun;1(2):e52-e54. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30013-5. Epub 2019 May 23.
2
Validation of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS).移动应用评定量表(MARS)的验证。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 2;15(11):e0241480. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241480. eCollection 2020.
3
The German Version of the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS-G): Development and Validation Study.移动应用评级量表(MARS-G)的德文版:开发与验证研究。
一款用于训练创伤性脑损伤患者注意力过程的新型移动应用程序:逻辑与生态内容验证研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Apr 9;9:e64174. doi: 10.2196/64174.
4
Best Practice Recommendations for Conducting and Reporting Controlled Trials in Clinical Hypnosis Research.临床催眠研究中进行和报告对照试验的最佳实践推荐。
J Evid Based Integr Med. 2024 Jan-Dec;29:2515690X241274538. doi: 10.1177/2515690X241274538.
5
From Clicks to Calm: Investigating the Link Between Mindfulness and Digital Hoarding Behavior Among Chinese Youth.从点击到平静:探究中国青少年正念与数字囤积行为之间的联系
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 Sep 24;17:3283-3297. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S473523. eCollection 2024.
6
The impact of mindfulness apps on psychological processes of change: a systematic review.正念应用程序对改变心理过程的影响:一项系统综述。
Npj Ment Health Res. 2024 Mar 18;3(1):14. doi: 10.1038/s44184-023-00048-5.
7
Cognitive, psychological, and physiological effects of a web-based mindfulness intervention in older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: an open study.新冠疫情期间基于网络的正念干预对老年人认知、心理和生理的影响:一项开放性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Feb 14;24(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04766-z.
8
Stress Management Apps: Systematic Search and Multidimensional Assessment of Quality and Characteristics.压力管理应用程序:系统搜索与质量和特征的多维评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Aug 29;11:e42415. doi: 10.2196/42415.
9
Compassion apps for better mental health: qualitative review.改善心理健康的共情应用程序:定性综述
BJPsych Open. 2023 Aug 4;9(5):e141. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.537.
10
Scope, Characteristics, Behavior Change Techniques, and Quality of Conversational Agents for Mental Health and Well-Being: Systematic Assessment of Apps.用于心理健康和福祉的对话代理的范围、特征、行为改变技术和质量:应用程序的系统评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 18;25:e45984. doi: 10.2196/45984.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Mar 27;8(3):e14479. doi: 10.2196/14479.
4
'Help for trauma from the app stores?' A systematic review and standardised rating of apps for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).“应用商店能为创伤提供帮助吗?” 创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)应用程序的系统评价与标准化评级
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020 Jan 9;11(1):1701788. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1701788. eCollection 2020.
5
Outcomes of Online Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Patients With Residual Depressive Symptoms: A Randomized Clinical Trial.在线正念认知疗法治疗残留抑郁症状患者的结局:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 1;77(6):563-573. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.4693.
6
Standalone smartphone apps for mental health-a systematic review and meta-analysis.用于心理健康的独立智能手机应用程序——一项系统评价与荟萃分析
NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Dec 2;2:118. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0188-8. eCollection 2019.
7
Regulating digital health technologies with transparency: the case for dynamic and multi-stakeholder evaluation.用透明度规范数字健康技术:动态和多利益相关者评估案例。
BMC Med. 2019 Dec 3;17(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1447-x.
8
Evaluation of a mindfulness-based mobile application with college students: A pilot study.正念为基础的移动应用对大学生的评估:一项初步研究。
J Am Coll Health. 2021 Feb-Mar;69(2):208-214. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2019.1661420. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
9
German Mobile Apps in Rheumatology: Review and Analysis Using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS).德国风湿病学移动应用程序:使用移动应用程序评级量表(MARS)进行的评估与分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Aug 5;7(8):e14991. doi: 10.2196/14991.
10
Prescribable mHealth apps identified from an overview of systematic reviews.从系统评价综述中识别出的可开具处方的移动健康应用程序。
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 May 9;1:12. doi: 10.1038/s41746-018-0021-9. eCollection 2018.