• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

网状与非网状脱细胞真皮基质在即刻乳房重建中的对比研究。

Comparative Study of Meshed and Nonmeshed Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Breast Reconstruction.

机构信息

From the Shaare Zedek Medical Center; The Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Assuta Medical Center; and Kaplan Medical Center.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Nov;144(5):1045-1053. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006116.

DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000006116
PMID:31441807
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acellular dermal matrices are commonly used to support implant-based breast reconstruction. Meshing may enhance integration, reduce drain time and seroma, and decrease surgical costs.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-center analysis of 83 adult women (115 breasts) undergoing one-stage (84.3 percent) or two-stage (15.7 percent) immediate breast reconstruction with bovine-derived acellular dermal matrix (SurgiMend) meshed at a 2:1 ratio. Outcomes were compared with previously published data from a control group of 111 patients (147 breasts) undergoing the same procedure with nonmeshed (fenestrated) acellular dermal matrix.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients receiving meshed acellular dermal matrix was 48.3 years and the mean body mass index was 23.6 kg/m. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics versus controls, other than chemotherapy history (received by fewer patients in the meshed acellular dermal matrix group). Mean follow-up was 23.6 months. Overall rates of minor and major complications in the meshed acellular dermal matrix group were 16.5 percent and 13.0 percent, respectively-similar to controls (25.2 percent and 12.9 percent). However, with meshed acellular dermal matrix, there were significantly fewer major seromas (0 percent versus 8.2 percent; OR, ∞; 95 percent CI, 1.927 to ∞), fewer total hematomas (0 percent versus 4.8 percent; OR, ∞; 95 percent CI, 1.022 to ∞), and fewer total infections (10.4 percent versus 23.8 percent; OR, 2.682; 95 percent CI, 1.259 to 5.802) compared with controls. Time to drain removal was reduced. Rates of capsular contracture (5.2 percent versus 2.7 percent) and explantation (5.2 percent versus 2.7 percent) were similar in the meshed acellular dermal matrix and control groups.

CONCLUSION

Acellular dermal matrix meshing reduces rates of postoperative seroma, hematoma, and infection and decreases drain removal time compared with nonmeshed acellular dermal matrix.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

摘要

背景

脱细胞真皮基质常用于支持基于植入物的乳房重建。网孔化可以增强整合,减少引流时间和血清肿,降低手术成本。

方法

这是一项回顾性、单中心分析,纳入 83 名接受牛源脱细胞真皮基质(SurgiMend)网状物 2:1 比例的一期(84.3%)或二期(15.7%)即刻乳房重建的成年女性(115 个乳房)。结果与接受相同程序但未进行网状(有孔)脱细胞真皮基质的 111 名患者(147 个乳房)的对照组的先前发表数据进行了比较。

结果

接受网状脱细胞真皮基质的患者平均年龄为 48.3 岁,平均体重指数为 23.6kg/m²。除化疗史(网状脱细胞真皮基质组接受化疗的患者较少)外,两组患者的基线特征无显著差异。平均随访时间为 23.6 个月。网状脱细胞真皮基质组的小并发症和大并发症发生率分别为 16.5%和 13.0%,与对照组相似(25.2%和 12.9%)。然而,网状脱细胞真皮基质组的大血清肿发生率显著较低(0%比 8.2%;OR,∞;95%CI,1.927 至 ∞),总血肿发生率较低(0%比 4.8%;OR,∞;95%CI,1.022 至 ∞),总感染率较低(10.4%比 23.8%;OR,2.682;95%CI,1.259 至 5.802)。引流管去除时间缩短。网状脱细胞真皮基质组和对照组的包膜挛缩(5.2%比 2.7%)和假体取出(5.2%比 2.7%)发生率相似。

结论

与非网状脱细胞真皮基质相比,脱细胞真皮基质网孔化可降低术后血清肿、血肿和感染的发生率,并缩短引流管去除时间。

临床问题/证据水平:治疗性,III 级。

相似文献

1
Comparative Study of Meshed and Nonmeshed Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Breast Reconstruction.网状与非网状脱细胞真皮基质在即刻乳房重建中的对比研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Nov;144(5):1045-1053. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006116.
2
Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix.带与不带脱细胞真皮基质的基于植入物的即刻乳房重建的比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Nov;128(5):403e-410e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31822b6637.
3
Decreased Length of Postoperative Drain Use, Parenteral Opioids, Length of Stay, and Complication Rates in Patients Receiving Meshed versus Unmeshed Acellular Dermal Matrix in 194 Submuscular Tissue Expander-Based Breast Reconstructions: A Single-Surgeon Cohort Study.在 194 例基于胸肌下组织扩张器的乳房重建中,使用网片与非网片脱细胞真皮基质的患者术后引流管使用时间、阿片类药物的使用、住院时间和并发症发生率的比较:单外科医生队列研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Apr;145(4):889-897. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006635.
4
Bovine Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Retrospective, Observational Study with SurgiMend.牛脱细胞真皮基质在即刻乳房重建中的应用:一项使用SurgiMend的回顾性观察研究
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jan;141(1):1e-10e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003982.
5
The Comparison of Strattice and SurgiMend in Acellular Dermal Matrix-Assisted, Implant-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction.Strattice 与 SurgiMend 在脱细胞真皮基质辅助即刻乳房重建中应用的比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Feb;141(2):283-293. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004018.
6
Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter Assessment of Risks and Benefits.即时扩张器/植入物乳房重建中脱细胞真皮基质的多中心风险与效益评估
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Dec;140(6):1091-1100. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003842.
7
Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Comparison of Sterile and Aseptic AlloDerm in 2039 Consecutive Cases.即刻基于假体的乳房重建应用脱细胞真皮基质:2039 例连续病例中无菌与消毒同种异体真皮的比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Dec;142(6):1401-1409. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004968.
8
Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction without Placement of Acellular Dermal Matrix or Mesh after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.保留乳头乳晕的乳房切除术同期经胸肌前直接置埋乳房假体再造,不使用脱细胞真皮基质或补片。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Nov 1;150(5):973-983. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009618. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
9
Sterile "ready-to-use" AlloDerm decreases postoperative infectious complications in patients undergoing immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix.使用无菌的“即用型”同种异体真皮移植物可降低脱细胞真皮基质即刻乳房重建患者的术后感染并发症。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Oct;132(4):725-736. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829fe35b.
10
440 Consecutive immediate, implant-based, single-surgeon breast reconstructions in 281 patients: a comparison of early outcomes and costs between SurgiMend fetal bovine and AlloDerm human cadaveric acellular dermal matrices.440 例连续即刻、基于植入物、单外科医生乳房重建术在 281 例患者中的应用:SurgiMend 胎牛和 AlloDerm 人尸体去细胞真皮基质之间早期结果和成本的比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 May;131(5):940-951. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182865ab3.

引用本文的文献

1
Revisiting low complications of VICRYL mesh in breast reconstruction: Insights from an updated systematic review.重新审视薇乔补片在乳房重建中的低并发症:来自最新系统评价的见解
JPRAS Open. 2025 Apr 5;44:354-363. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2025.04.002. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Direct-to-implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction in Women Older Than 65 Years: Analysis of Safety and Patient-reported Outcome.65岁以上女性直接植入式胸大肌前乳房重建:安全性及患者报告结局分析
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Mar 25;13(3):e6647. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006647. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Implants versus autologous tissue flaps for breast reconstruction following mastectomy.
乳房切除术乳房再造中假体与自体组织皮瓣的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 31;10(10):CD013821. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013821.pub2.
4
Effect of Perioperative Prophylactic Intravenous Antibiotic Use in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study.围手术期预防性静脉使用抗生素在即刻乳房植入重建术中的效果:一项回顾性匹配队列研究
Arch Plast Surg. 2024 Feb 7;51(1):36-41. doi: 10.1055/a-2161-7521. eCollection 2024 Jan.
5
[Update and Trends in Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy].[乳房切除术后乳房重建的更新与趋势]
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2023 Aug;55(4):253-261. doi: 10.1055/a-2082-1542. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
6
Tissue expansion techniques in reconstructive surgery: a 10-year bibliometric analysis.重建手术中的组织扩张技术:一项为期10年的文献计量分析。
Ann Transl Med. 2023 Mar 15;11(5):204. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-3643.
7
Recent advances in decellularized biomaterials for wound healing.用于伤口愈合的脱细胞生物材料的最新进展。
Mater Today Bio. 2023 Feb 23;19:100589. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100589. eCollection 2023 Apr.
8
A Nationwide Analysis Evaluating the Safety of Using Acellular Dermal Matrix with Tissue Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction.一项评估脱细胞真皮基质与组织扩张器乳房再造联合使用安全性的全国性分析。
Arch Plast Surg. 2022 Dec 13;49(6):716-723. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1758638. eCollection 2022 Nov.
9
Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix for Two-Staged Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: An Institutional Experience.用于两阶段胸大肌前乳房重建的网状脱细胞真皮基质:机构经验
Arch Plast Surg. 2022 Apr 6;49(2):166-173. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1744408. eCollection 2022 Mar.
10
Preparation of laser microporous porcine acellular dermal matrix and observation of wound transplantation.激光微孔猪脱细胞真皮基质的制备及创面移植观察。
Cell Tissue Bank. 2023 Mar;24(1):191-202. doi: 10.1007/s10561-022-10023-7. Epub 2022 Jul 9.