Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain, University of California, San Diego, CA.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020 Jan;34(1):136-142. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.07.142. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
The literature remains sparse regarding the influence of primary anesthesia type (monitored anesthesia care [MAC] v general anesthesia) on 30-day adverse events after transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR). The objective of this study was to report the association of primary anesthesia type with 30-day adverse events after TCAR.
Retrospective cohort analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Registry from 2012-2016.
Multi-institutional.
The final analysis included 625 patients who underwent TCAR.
The primary exposure was anesthesia type, categorized as MAC (defined as regional anesthesia, local anesthesia, or MAC) or general anesthesia. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Secondary 30-day endpoints included pulmonary, renal, and cardiac complications; sepsis; deep venous thrombosis; stroke; blood transfusion; embolism/thrombosis of ipsilateral carotid vessel; and redo surgery.
The prevalence of MAC was 73.4%. A 93% decrease was observed in the odds of 30-day mortality (p = 0.003) in patients who received MAC. Mean (standard deviation) hospital stay (2.99 [5.92] d v 4.30 [9.15] d; p = 0.037) and case duration (88.45 [39.48] min v 105.85 [63.77] min; p < 0.001) were shorter among patients who received MAC. The odds of pulmonary complications (odds ratio 0.19, 95% confidence interval 0.05-0.65; p = 0.009) were significantly lower in the MAC group. No other differences in secondary endpoints were found between the anesthesia type cohorts.
The majority of studies on this topic pertain to carotid endarterectomy patients, and this retrospective analysis sheds light on outcomes after TCAR. Overall, the authors urge additional risk stratification and preprocedural optimization to carefully select patients who may undergo MAC.
关于原发性麻醉类型(监测麻醉护理[MAC]与全身麻醉)对经颈动脉血运重建(TCAR)后 30 天不良事件的影响,文献仍然较少。本研究的目的是报告原发性麻醉类型与 TCAR 后 30 天不良事件的相关性。
2012 年至 2016 年美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划登记处的回顾性队列分析。
多机构。
最终分析纳入 625 例接受 TCAR 的患者。
主要暴露因素是麻醉类型,分为 MAC(定义为区域麻醉、局部麻醉或 MAC)或全身麻醉。主要终点为 30 天死亡率。次要 30 天终点包括肺部、肾脏和心脏并发症;脓毒症;深静脉血栓形成;卒;输血;同侧颈动脉血管栓塞/血栓形成;以及再次手术。
MAC 的患病率为 73.4%。接受 MAC 的患者 30 天死亡率的几率降低了 93%(p=0.003)。接受 MAC 的患者平均(标准差)住院时间(2.99[5.92]d 比 4.30[9.15]d;p=0.037)和手术持续时间(88.45[39.48]min 比 105.85[63.77]min;p<0.001)较短。MAC 组肺部并发症的几率较低(比值比 0.19,95%置信区间 0.05-0.65;p=0.009)。两组在次要终点方面无其他差异。
关于这个主题的大多数研究都涉及颈动脉内膜切除术患者,本回顾性分析揭示了 TCAR 后的结果。总体而言,作者敦促进行额外的风险分层和术前优化,以仔细选择可能接受 MAC 的患者。