Departments of Medicine and Physiology, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Banting and Best Diabetes Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Robarts Research Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019 Nov;7(11):880-886. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30156-1. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
Diagnostic scoring systems for familial hypercholesterolaemia and familial chylomicronaemia syndrome often cannot differentiate between adults who have extreme dyslipidaemia based on a simple monogenic cause versus people with a more complex cause involving polygenic factors and an environmental component. This more complex group of patients carries a substantial risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in the case of marked hypercholesterolaemia and pancreatitis in the case of marked hypertriglyceridaemia. Complications are mainly a function of the degree of disturbance in lipid metabolism resulting in elevated lipid levels, so the added value of knowing the precise genetic cause in clinical decision making is unclear and does not lead to clinically meaningful benefit. We propose that for severe elevations of plasma low density lipoprotein cholesterol or triglyceride, the primary factor driving intervention should be the biochemical perturbation rather than the clinical risk score. This underscores the importance of expanding the definition of severe dyslipidaemias and to not rely solely on clinical scoring systems to identify individuals who would benefit from appropriate treatment approaches. We advocate for the use of simple, practical, clinical, and largely biochemically based definitions for severe hypercholesterolaemia (eg, LDL cholesterol >5 mmol/L) and severe hypertriglyceridaemia (triglyceride >10 mmol/L), which complement current definitions of familial hypercholesterolaemia and familial chylomicronaemia syndrome. Irrespective of the precise genetic cause, individuals diagnosed with severe hypercholesterolaemia and severe hypertriglyceridaemia require intensive therapy, including special consideration for new effective but more expensive therapies.
用于家族性高胆固醇血症和家族性乳糜微粒血症综合征的诊断评分系统通常无法区分基于简单单基因病因的具有极端血脂异常的成年人与具有涉及多基因因素和环境成分的更复杂病因的人。在存在明显高胆固醇血症的情况下,此类更复杂的患者群体具有发生动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的很大风险,在存在明显高甘油三酯血症的情况下具有发生胰腺炎的很大风险。并发症主要是脂质代谢紊乱导致脂质水平升高的结果,因此,了解精确遗传病因在临床决策中的附加价值并不明确,并且不会带来有临床意义的益处。我们提出,对于血浆低密度脂蛋白胆固醇或甘油三酯的严重升高,驱动干预的主要因素应该是生化紊乱,而不是临床风险评分。这强调了扩展严重血脂异常定义的重要性,并且不要仅仅依靠临床评分系统来识别那些将从适当治疗方法中获益的个体。我们提倡使用简单、实用、临床和主要基于生化的严重高胆固醇血症(例如,LDL 胆固醇>5mmol/L)和严重高甘油三酯血症(甘油三酯>10mmol/L)的定义,这些定义补充了家族性高胆固醇血症和家族性乳糜微粒血症综合征的现有定义。无论确切的遗传病因如何,诊断为严重高胆固醇血症和严重高甘油三酯血症的个体都需要强化治疗,包括特别考虑新的有效但更昂贵的治疗方法。