Section of Periodontology, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven & Dentistry, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium.
OMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Nov;46(11):1134-1143. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13183. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
The aim of this article was to evaluate the accuracy of buccal bone thickness measurements around implants on CBCT.
Forty-four Osseospeed EV implants (3.6 in Ø) were placed guided and flapless in five fresh frozen human cadaver heads. The buccal peri-implant bone was measured clinically via guided bone sounding. Post-op CBCTs were taken with two different CBCT scanners (NewTom and Accuitomo ) on which the buccal bone was measured. Consequently, after implant removal, a new CBCT was made without implant artefacts (image reference standard) on which the real buccal bone thickness was scored.
Due to an average blooming (artificial increase of implant diameter) percentage of 12%-15%, the buccal peri-implant bone thickness was underestimated by 0.3 mm on both CBCT devices. Immediately adjacent to the implant blooming area, a doubtful zone of about 0.45 mm was observed in which the buccal bone was not always visible. Buccal bone that was thick enough to fall outside this doubtful zone could always be visualized.
The findings in this study may help the clinician in the decision-making process whether or not to intervene surgically in areas with ambiguous CBCT results.
本文旨在评估 CBCT 中种植体周围颊侧骨厚度测量的准确性。
将 44 颗 Osseospeed EV 种植体(直径 3.6 毫米)无瓣、引导式植入五具新鲜冷冻的人体头颅标本中。通过引导骨探查术对种植体周围颊侧骨进行临床测量。术后使用两种不同的 CBCT 扫描仪(NewTom 和 Accuitomo)拍摄 CBCT,对颊侧骨进行测量。随后,在没有种植体伪影的情况下(图像参考标准),移除种植体后再次进行新的 CBCT 扫描,对实际的颊侧骨厚度进行评分。
由于平均blooming(人为增加种植体直径)百分比为 12%-15%,两种 CBCT 设备均低估了 0.3 毫米的颊侧种植体周围骨厚度。在紧邻种植体 blooming 区域,观察到一个约 0.45 毫米的可疑区域,其中颊侧骨并不总是可见。足够厚的颊侧骨超出这个可疑区域,总是可以被看到。
本研究的结果可以帮助临床医生在决策是否对 CBCT 结果存在疑问的区域进行手术干预时提供参考。