Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611.
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611.
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Nov;102(11):10411-10422. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-16533. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
Providing access to forage has been shown to influence feeding behavior and non-nutritive oral behavior in individually housed calves, and these effects may be enhanced or altered in calves reared in social housing. We evaluated the effect of hay provision on the behavioral development and performance of group-housed dairy calves. Holstein calves (n = 32) were group-housed (4 calves per group) at 17 ± 3 (mean ± SD) d of age. All calves were provided milk replacer (8 L/d) via an automated milk feeder and pelleted starter and water ad libitum. Pens were randomly assigned to receive either chopped coastal Bermuda grass in buckets adjacent to the starter trough (starter and hay, STH; n = 4 pens), or no additional feed (starter only, ST; n = 4 pens). Calves were weaned through a 10-d stepdown program beginning at 46 d of age. Intake of solid feed and hay were recorded daily, and body weights were measured weekly. The behavior of 2 focal calves per pen was recorded continuously from video for 12 h on 2 consecutive days during each of wk 4, 6, and 7 of life, to measure solid feed intake time, grooming, and pen-directed sucking. Hay provision influenced total feed intake, with calves provided hay having greater total solid feed intake in the week before weaning (0.79 vs. 0.55 kg/d, STH vs. ST, respectively; SE = 0.19). Average daily gain (ADG) was similar during the pre-weaning period but tended to be greater for STH calves during weaning. Calves in pens provided hay also had fewer unrewarded visits to the milk feeder during weaning (12.5 vs. 21.1 visits per 12 h, STH vs. ST, respectively; SE = 3.59) and performed less pen-directed sucking (9.11 vs. 19.3 min per 12 h, STH vs. ST, respectively; SE = 2.86). Self-grooming time and bout characteristics evolved differently between treatments over time, with pens of calves provided hay having a greater increase in frequency and duration of self-grooming bouts during weaning. Overall, we found that providing hay to pre-weaned calves resulted in behavioral and performance benefits, including greater total feed intake and reductions in pen-directed sucking, suggesting that access to hay may improve calf welfare.
为单独饲养的小牛提供草料已被证明会影响其采食行为和非营养性口腔行为,而在群体饲养的小牛中,这些影响可能会增强或改变。我们评估了提供干草对群体饲养的奶牛小牛行为发育和表现的影响。荷斯坦小牛(n = 32)在 17 ± 3(均值 ± 标准差)日龄时进行群体饲养(每组 4 头)。所有小牛通过自动喂奶器和颗粒状 starter 接受牛奶替代品(8 L/d),并自由采食水和 pellet 状 starter。围栏随机分配接受 starter 料槽旁的切碎的沿海百慕大草(starter 和干草,STH;n = 4 个围栏)或不提供其他饲料(仅 starter,ST;n = 4 个围栏)。小牛通过 46 日龄开始的 10 天逐步断奶方案断奶。每天记录固体饲料和干草的摄入量,每周测量体重。在生命的第 4、6 和 7 周的连续两天内,每个围栏的 2 头焦点小牛的行为通过视频进行连续 12 小时记录,以测量固体饲料摄入量、理毛和围栏导向吸吮。提供干草会影响总采食量,提供干草的小牛在断奶前一周的总固体饲料采食量更大(0.79 与 0.55 kg/d,STH 与 ST,SE = 0.19)。断奶前期间的平均日增重(ADG)相似,但 STH 小牛在断奶期间的 ADG 趋于更高。提供干草的围栏中的小牛在断奶期间对牛奶饲喂器的无奖励访问次数也更少(12.5 与 21.1 次/12 h,STH 与 ST,SE = 3.59),并且执行的围栏导向吸吮更少(9.11 与 19.3 min/12 h,STH 与 ST,SE = 2.86)。自我梳理时间和回合特征随时间在处理间表现出不同的演变,提供干草的围栏中的小牛在断奶期间自我梳理回合的频率和持续时间增加更大。总的来说,我们发现,为未断奶的小牛提供干草会带来行为和表现上的好处,包括增加总采食量和减少围栏导向吸吮,这表明获得干草可能会提高小牛的福利。