Freese Jens, Klement Rainer Johannes, Lötzerich Helmut
Institute of Outdoor Sports and Environmental Science, German Sports University Cologne, Cologne, 50933, Germany.
Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital Schweinfurt, Schweinfurt, 97422, Germany.
F1000Res. 2018 Mar 1;7:252. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.14052.2. eCollection 2018.
We here describe two apparent paradoxes concerning high CRP levels and NCD risk. One has emerged from observational studies in the Amazon region showing that the indigenous Tsimane in Bolivia appear protected against non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as obesity, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases despite increased inflammatory markers. These findings stand in contrast to Western societies, where an increasing body of evidence demonstrates that low-grade-inflammation is the driver of NCDs. The second paradox has emerged from two field studies (Eifel studies) conducted in 2013 and 2014 with Westerners who returned to a simulated Palaeolithic lifestyle in a National park for 4 days. We had detected elevated inflammation markers, despite otherwise anti-inflammatory effects of these interventions as indicated by metabolic blood parameters. We here propose three hypotheses for this second inflammatory paradox.
我们在此描述了两个与高CRP水平和非传染性疾病风险相关的明显悖论。其中一个悖论来自于亚马逊地区的观察性研究,该研究表明,尽管炎症标志物有所增加,但玻利维亚的原住民齐曼人似乎对肥胖、2型糖尿病和心血管疾病等非传染性疾病具有抵抗力。这些发现与西方社会形成了对比,在西方社会,越来越多的证据表明低度炎症是导致非传染性疾病的原因。第二个悖论来自于2013年和2014年对西方人进行的两项实地研究(艾费尔研究),这些西方人在一个国家公园中回归模拟旧石器时代的生活方式,为期4天。尽管这些干预措施在代谢血液参数方面显示出抗炎作用,但我们检测到炎症标志物升高。我们在此针对这第二个炎症悖论提出了三个假设。