Suppr超能文献

获得性血友病A中针对重组猪因子VIII的交叉反应性抑制剂:来自GTH-AH 01/2010研究的数据。

Cross-reacting inhibitors against recombinant porcine factor VIII in acquired hemophilia A: Data from the GTH-AH 01/2010 Study.

作者信息

Türkantoz Halet, Königs Christoph, Knöbl Paul, Klamroth Robert, Holstein Katharina, Huth-Kühne Angela, Heinz Jürgen, Eichler Hermann, Tiede Andreas

机构信息

Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Department of Pediatrics, Clinical and Molecular Hemostasis, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

出版信息

J Thromb Haemost. 2020 Jan;18(1):36-43. doi: 10.1111/jth.14618. Epub 2019 Sep 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recombinant porcine factor VIII (rpFVIII, OBI-1, susoctocog alfa) is used for the treatment of acute bleeds in patients with acquired hemophilia A (AHA). Inhibitors in AHA can sometimes cross-react with rpFVIII.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the frequency, strength, and determinants of cross-reactivity.

PATIENTS/METHODS: Baseline samples from 70 patients of the prospective, observational cohort study GTH-AH 01/2010 were assessed for anti-human FVIII and anti-rpFVIII inhibitors using modified Nijmegen-Bethesda assays, as well as anti-human FVIII domain reactivity using enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA).

RESULTS

Anti-human FVIII inhibitors were present in all samples ranging between 0.7 and 3891 Bethesda Units (BU)/mL. Inhibitors from 31 of 70 patients (44%) partially inhibited rpFVIII with anti-rpFVIII titers ranging between 0.5 and 471 BU/mL. Anti-rpFVIII titers were ≤5 BU in most patients. Patients with cross-reacting inhibitors, as compared to patients without, had significantly higher anti-human FVIII titers (27.8 versus 5.4 BU/mL) and lower baseline FVIII activity (<1 versus 2.6 IU/dL). The ratio between anti-rpFVIII to anti-human titers was highest for inhibitors involving the C1 domain. Cross-reactivity was very rare, if inhibitors reacted only with the C2 domain of FVIII (6%). An anti-human FVIII titer of >100 BU/mL predicted cross-reactivity with 97% likelihood, whereas an anti-human FVIII titer of <3.8 BU/mL predicted absent cross-reactivity with 90% likelihood.

CONCLUSION

Cross-reacting inhibitors should be considered when choosing a treatment for bleeding patients with AHA. Cross-reactivity is frequent in patients with anti-human FVIII titers of >100 BU/mL.

摘要

背景

重组猪因子VIII(rpFVIII,OBI - 1,苏索托考因子α)用于治疗获得性血友病A(AHA)患者的急性出血。AHA患者体内的抑制剂有时会与rpFVIII发生交叉反应。

目的

评估交叉反应的频率、强度及决定因素。

患者/方法:前瞻性观察队列研究GTH - AH 01/2010中70例患者的基线样本,采用改良的奈梅亨 - 贝塞斯达试验评估抗人FVIII和抗rpFVIII抑制剂,并采用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)评估抗人FVIII结构域反应性。

结果

所有样本中均存在抗人FVIII抑制剂,范围在0.7至3891贝塞斯达单位(BU)/mL之间。70例患者中有31例(44%)的抑制剂部分抑制rpFVIII,抗rpFVIII滴度范围在0.5至471 BU/mL之间。大多数患者的抗rpFVIII滴度≤5 BU。与无交叉反应抑制剂的患者相比,有交叉反应抑制剂的患者抗人FVIII滴度显著更高(27.8对5.4 BU/mL),基线FVIII活性更低(<1对2.6 IU/dL)。涉及C1结构域的抑制剂,其抗rpFVIII与抗人滴度之比最高。如果抑制剂仅与FVIII的C2结构域反应,则交叉反应非常罕见(6%)。抗人FVIII滴度>100 BU/mL时,预测交叉反应的可能性为97%,而抗人FVIII滴度<3.8 BU/mL时,预测无交叉反应的可能性为90%。

结论

为AHA出血患者选择治疗方法时应考虑交叉反应抑制剂。抗人FVIII滴度>100 BU/mL的患者中交叉反应很常见。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验