Monash Infectious Diseases, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Australian Centre for Blood Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Intern Med J. 2020 May;50(5):556-564. doi: 10.1111/imj.14621.
Individuals splenectomised for trauma have lower infection rates than those splenectomised for other conditions. Residual functional splenic tissue (FST) after splenectomy may provide ongoing immunological protection.
To quantify the prevalence and volume of residual FST post-splenectomy using standard testing.
Splenectomised adults were recruited from the Spleen Australia clinical registry. Eligible individuals had been splenectomised at least 1 year prior to their visit and resided in Victoria. Splenic function was identified by evaluating Howell-Jolly bodies and IgM memory B cells. A 99m-Technetium-labelled, heat-denatured erythrocyte scintigraphic scan was performed if splenic function was detected.
Initially, 75 splenectomised individuals (all cause) were recruited, with a median of 58 years of age and who were splenectomised a median of 14 years previously. The most common indications for splenectomy were trauma (30.7%) and haematological disease (28.0%). Scintigraphy identified FST in nine individuals (12.0%). Eight had been splenectomised for trauma. In this cohort, 34.8% of individuals splenectomised for trauma had residual FST. To explore our findings further, 45 additional individuals were recruited, predominately individuals splenectomised for trauma. Twenty-five individuals completed assessments by December 2018. An additional 11 individuals had FST, of whom 9 had been splenectomised for trauma. Overall, we identified 20 individuals with residual FST. Volumes ranged from 2.2 to 216.0 cc. We saw individuals with accessory spleens and splenotic nodules and an individual with both. Seventeen individuals had been splenectomised for trauma.
Residual FST is commonly seen in individuals splenectomised for trauma. It can present in varying distributions and of varying volume. The clinical significance is unclear.
因创伤而行脾切除术的个体比因其他疾病而行脾切除术的个体感染率更低。脾切除术后残留的功能性脾组织(FST)可能提供持续的免疫保护。
使用标准检测方法定量脾切除术后残留 FST 的发生率和体积。
从澳大利亚脾脏临床登记处招募脾切除术成人患者。符合条件的个体在就诊前至少 1 年接受了脾切除术,并且居住在维多利亚州。通过评估 Howell-Jolly 小体和 IgM 记忆 B 细胞来确定脾功能。如果检测到脾功能,则进行 99mTc 标记的、热变性红细胞闪烁扫描。
最初招募了 75 名因各种原因接受脾切除术的个体,中位年龄为 58 岁,中位脾切除术时间为 14 年。脾切除术最常见的指征是创伤(30.7%)和血液疾病(28.0%)。闪烁扫描在 9 名个体(12.0%)中发现了 FST。其中 8 人因创伤而行脾切除术。在这一组中,34.8%的创伤性脾切除术患者有残留 FST。为了进一步探讨我们的发现,招募了 45 名额外的个体,主要是因创伤而行脾切除术的个体。截至 2018 年 12 月,25 名个体完成了评估。另外 11 名个体有 FST,其中 9 人因创伤而行脾切除术。总的来说,我们发现了 20 名有残留 FST 的个体。体积范围从 2.2 到 216.0 cc。我们发现了副脾和脾性结节,以及 1 名同时存在这两种情况的个体。17 名个体因创伤而行脾切除术。
在因创伤而行脾切除术的个体中,常见残留 FST。它可以以不同的分布和体积出现。其临床意义尚不清楚。