Extension of Iliac Branch Device Repair Into the Superior Gluteal Artery Is a Safe and Effective Maneuver.

BACKGROUND

In some cases of complex aortoiliac endovascular repair, the hypogastric landing zone is suboptimal or even insufficient. This study aimed at the technical feasibility and at the outcome of iliac branch device (IBD) deployment with extension of the IBD into the superior gluteal artery (SGA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study involves a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained single-center cohort of patients with implantation of IBD for aortoiliac and postdissection aneurysms. The IBD cohort with landing zones in the hypogastric main trunk (IIA IBD) was compared with the IBD cohort with landing zones in the SGA (SGA IBD). The main outcome parameters were primary technical success, patency of the hypogastric branch, and freedom from IBD-specific secondary interventions within 30 days. Other outcomes of interest were long-term patency and freedom from buttock claudication, as well as the incidence of endoleaks. Group comparisons were made by univariate significance tests, and freedom from reintervention was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier-method.

RESULTS

From January 2015 to October 2017, a total of 46 IBDs were implanted in 40 patients (39 male; mean age, 71.9 ± 9.1 years). Nineteen of 46 (41.3%) IBDs were extended with at least one bridging stent graft into the SGA because of aneurysmal or short internal iliac artery (IIA). Technical success was achieved in 97.8% (96.3% for IIA IBD vs. 100% for SGA IBD, P = 0.163), and the primary ipsilateral limb patency rate was 100% within 30 days after the procedure. During a mean follow-up period of 19.8 ± 10.0 months (24.7 ± 10.8 for IIA IBD vs. 25.1 ± 9.8 for SGA IBD, P = 0.461), 11.1% IBDs in the IIA IBD group and 15.8% IBDs in the SGA IBD group needed secondary interventions (P = 0.33). Follow-up revealed no patients suffering from persistent buttock claudication or erectile dysfunction. One patient in the SGA IBD group died at late follow-up from a non-aneurysm-related cause.

CONCLUSIONS

Extension of IBD into the SGA is a technically feasible and safe maneuver in the treatment of aortoiliac aneurysms with outcomes comparable to those when IBDs extend to the main trunk of the hypogastric artery.