McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Qual Health Res. 2020 Feb;30(3):448-457. doi: 10.1177/1049732319868981. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
To address the risks associated with polypharmacy, health care providers are investigating the feasibility of deprescribing programs as part of routine medical care to reduce medication burden to older adults. As older adults are enrolled in these programs, they are confronted with two dominant and legitimate accounts of medications, labeled the medication paradox: . We investigated how the medication paradox operates in the lives of older adults. In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted and analyzed with older adults aged 70+ to identify the various paradoxes that seniors live through regarding their medications and the narratives that they engage to negotiate these contradictions. Older adults were found to have established interpretative repertoires to make sense of the incongruent narratives of the medication paradox. In this article, we demonstrate older adults' efforts to carve out their unique place in the dichotomized institution of medicine.
为了解决与多种药物治疗相关的风险,医疗保健提供者正在研究停用药物方案的可行性,将其作为常规医疗护理的一部分,以减轻老年人的药物负担。随着老年人被纳入这些方案,他们面临着两种占主导地位且合理的药物描述,被标记为药物悖论: 。我们调查了药物悖论在老年人生活中是如何运作的。对 70 岁以上的老年人进行了深入的定性访谈和分析,以确定老年人在其药物治疗方面所经历的各种悖论,以及他们用于协商这些矛盾的叙述。研究发现,老年人已经建立了解释性的资源库,以理解药物悖论不一致叙述。在本文中,我们展示了老年人努力在医学这一二分制度中找到自己的独特位置。