Departamento Nefrología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, España.
Departamento Nefrología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, España.
Nefrologia (Engl Ed). 2020 Jan-Feb;40(1):65-73. doi: 10.1016/j.nefro.2019.04.012. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
Actualy, there are few data about glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) drop in patients with resistant hypertension and how diferent therapies can modify chronic kidney disease progression (CKD).
To evaluate CKD progression in patients with resistant hypertension undergoing 2diferent therapies: treatment with spironolactone or furosemide.
We included 30 patients (21M, 9W) with a mean age of 66.3±9.1 years, eGFR 55.8±16.5ml/min/1.73 m, SBP 162.8±8.2 and DBP 90.2±6.2mmHg: 15 patients received spironolactone and 15 furosemide and we followed up them a median of 32 months (28-41).
The mean annual eGFR decrease was -2.8±5.4ml/min/1.73 m. In spironolactone group was -2.1±4.8ml/min/1.73 m and in furosemide group was -3.2±5.6ml/min/1.73 m, P<0.01. In patients received spironolactone, SBP decreased 23±9mmHg and in furosemide group decreased 16±3mmHg, P<.01. DBP decreased 10±8mmHg and 6±2mmHg, respectively (P<.01). Treatment with spironolactone reduced albuminuria from a serum albumin/creatine ratio of 210 (121-385) mg/g to 65 (45-120) mg/g at the end of follow-up, P<.01. There were no significant changes in the albumin/creatinine ratio in the furosemide group. The slower drop in kidney function was associated with lower SBP (P=.04), higher GFR (P=.01), lower albuminuria (P=.01), not diabetes mellitus (P=.01) and treatment with spironolactone (P=.02). Treatment with spironolactone (OR 2.13, IC 1.89-2.29) and lower albuminuria (OR 0.98, CI 0.97-0.99) maintain their independent predictive power in a multivariate model.
Treatment with spironolactone is more effective reducing BP and albuminuria in patients with resistant hypertension compared with furosemide and it is associated with a slower progression of CKD in the long term follow up.
目前关于抗高血压治疗患者肾小球滤过率(eGFR)下降的资料较少,也不清楚不同的治疗方法如何改变慢性肾脏病(CKD)的进展。
评估抗高血压治疗中 2 种不同治疗方法(螺内酯或呋塞米治疗)对患者 CKD 进展的影响。
共纳入 30 例患者(21 例男性,9 例女性),平均年龄 66.3±9.1 岁,eGFR 55.8±16.5ml/min/1.73 m2,SBP 162.8±8.2mmHg,DBP 90.2±6.2mmHg。15 例患者接受螺内酯治疗,15 例患者接受呋塞米治疗,中位随访时间 32 个月(28-41 个月)。
平均每年 eGFR 下降 2.8±5.4ml/min/1.73 m2。螺内酯组为-2.1±4.8ml/min/1.73 m2,呋塞米组为-3.2±5.6ml/min/1.73 m2,P<0.01。螺内酯组 SBP 下降 23±9mmHg,呋塞米组下降 16±3mmHg,P<.01。DBP 分别下降 10±8mmHg 和 6±2mmHg,P<.01。螺内酯治疗后血清白蛋白/肌酐比值从 210(121-385)mg/g 降至 65(45-120)mg/g,P<.01。呋塞米组白蛋白/肌酐比值无显著变化。肾功能下降速度较慢与较低的 SBP(P=.04)、较高的 GFR(P=.01)、较低的蛋白尿(P=.01)、无糖尿病(P=.01)和螺内酯治疗(P=.02)相关。螺内酯治疗(OR 2.13,95%CI 1.89-2.29)和较低的蛋白尿(OR 0.98,95%CI 0.97-0.99)在多变量模型中仍具有独立的预测价值。
与呋塞米相比,螺内酯治疗抗高血压患者能更有效降低血压和蛋白尿,长期随访显示其与 CKD 进展较慢相关。