• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据第八版 TNM 分类验证胸外转移数对预后的影响:日本单机构回顾性研究。

Validation of prognostic impact of number of extrathoracic metastases according to the eighth TNM classification: a single-institution retrospective study in Japan.

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, 1981 Kamoda, Kawagoe, Saitama, 350-8550, Japan.

Department of Pulmonary Medicine and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec;24(12):1549-1557. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01525-8. Epub 2019 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1007/s10147-019-01525-8
PMID:31452019
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the eighth edition of the TNM classification of lung cancer, the M1b and M1c descriptors are newly defined by the number of extrathoracic metastases. To verify the prognostic value of these descriptors in Japan, we reclassified our cases and re-evaluated prognosis in M1b and M1c patients.

METHODS

All non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with extrathoracic metastases who visited Saitama Medical Center from 2010 to 2016 were evaluated, divided according to the eighth edition of the TNM classification criteria into two groups (M1b, patients with single extrathoracic metastasis, and M1c, patients with multiple extrathoracic metastases), and followed up until December 31, 2017. Survival time analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and between-group differences in overall survival time (OS) were evaluated by the log-rank test.

RESULTS

A total of 231 NSCLC patients were divided into 57 patients with M1b and 174 with M1c. Median OS was 15.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.3-19.9) and 7.3 months (95% CI 5.7-10.7) for M1b and M1c, respectively, with no significant between-group difference (P = 0.239). However, after excluding patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation or echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (EML4-ALK) fusion gene, median OS was 12.9 months (95% CI 7.2-19.9) for M1b and 5.4 months (95% CI 3.8-6.3) for M1c, respectively, showing a significant difference (P = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of therapy directed toward EGFR mutation or EML4-ALK fusion gene might obscure the significant prognostic difference between M1b and M1c.

摘要

背景

在第八版肺癌 TNM 分期中,M1b 和 M1c 描述符是通过胸外转移的数量新定义的。为了验证这些描述符在日本的预后价值,我们重新分类了病例并重新评估了 M1b 和 M1c 患者的预后。

方法

评估了 2010 年至 2016 年期间在埼玉医疗中心就诊的所有患有胸外转移的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者,根据第八版 TNM 分类标准将患者分为两组(M1b,单发胸外转移患者;M1c,多发胸外转移患者),并随访至 2017 年 12 月 31 日。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法进行生存时间分析,对数秩检验评估总生存时间(OS)的组间差异。

结果

共纳入 231 例 NSCLC 患者,其中 57 例患者为 M1b,174 例患者为 M1c。M1b 和 M1c 的中位 OS 分别为 15.2 个月(95%CI:9.3-19.9)和 7.3 个月(95%CI 5.7-10.7),两组之间无显著差异(P=0.239)。然而,排除表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变或棘皮动物微管相关蛋白样 4 和间变性淋巴瘤激酶(EML4-ALK)融合基因患者后,M1b 的中位 OS 为 12.9 个月(95%CI 7.2-19.9),M1c 为 5.4 个月(95%CI 3.8-6.3),两组之间有显著差异(P=0.029)。

结论

针对 EGFR 突变或 EML4-ALK 融合基因的治疗效果可能掩盖了 M1b 和 M1c 之间显著的预后差异。

相似文献

1
Validation of prognostic impact of number of extrathoracic metastases according to the eighth TNM classification: a single-institution retrospective study in Japan.根据第八版 TNM 分类验证胸外转移数对预后的影响:日本单机构回顾性研究。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec;24(12):1549-1557. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01525-8. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
2
M1b Disease in the 8th Edition of TNM Staging of Lung Cancer: Pattern of Single Extrathoracic Metastasis and Clinical Outcome.第八版肺癌 TNM 分期中的 M1b 疾病:单一胸外转移模式和临床结局。
Oncologist. 2019 Aug;24(8):e749-e754. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0596. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
3
Prognostic Impact of Newly Proposed M Descriptors in TNM Classification of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.新提出的 M 描述符对非小细胞肺癌 TNM 分类的预后影响。
J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Mar;12(3):520-528. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.11.2216. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
4
Incorporation of EGFR mutation status into M descriptor of new TNM classification influences survival curves in non-small cell lung cancer patients.将 EGFR 突变状态纳入新的 TNM 分类中的 M 描述符会影响非小细胞肺癌患者的生存曲线。
Radiol Oncol. 2019 Nov 20;53(4):453-458. doi: 10.2478/raon-2019-0053.
5
The TNM 8 M1b and M1c classification for non-small cell lung cancer in a cohort of patients with brain metastases.非小细胞肺癌脑转移患者队列中的 TNM8 M1b 和 M1c 分类。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2017 Sep;19(9):1141-1146. doi: 10.1007/s12094-017-1651-0. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
6
Clinical relevance of the M1b and M1c descriptors from the proposed TNM 8 classification of lung cancer.肺癌TNM 8分类中M1b和M1c描述符的临床相关性。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2017 May;193(5):392-401. doi: 10.1007/s00066-017-1118-9. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
7
Prognostic impact of M descriptors of the 8th edition of TNM classification of lung cancer.肺癌TNM分类第8版中M描述符的预后影响。
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Mar;9(3):685-691. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.03.106.
8
Prognostic significance of genotype and number of metastatic sites in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.晚期非小细胞肺癌中基因型及转移部位数量的预后意义
Clin Lung Cancer. 2014 Nov;15(6):441-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
9
The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging Project for Lung Cancer: Proposals for the Revision of the M Descriptors in the Forthcoming Ninth Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer.国际肺癌研究协会肺癌分期项目:即将发布的第九版肺癌 TNM 分类中 M 描述符修订建议。
J Thorac Oncol. 2024 May;19(5):786-802. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2024.01.019. Epub 2024 Feb 4.
10
Nonsquamous, Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Who Carry a Double Mutation of EGFR, EML4-ALK or KRAS: Frequency, Clinical-Pathological Characteristics, and Response to Therapy.携带EGFR、EML4-ALK或KRAS双突变的非鳞状非小细胞肺癌患者:发生率、临床病理特征及对治疗的反应
Clin Lung Cancer. 2016 Sep;17(5):384-390. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2015.11.004. Epub 2015 Dec 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between clinical outcomes and local treatment in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer patients with single extrathoracic metastasis.IV 期非小细胞肺癌单肺外转移患者的临床结局与局部治疗的相关性。
Thorac Cancer. 2022 May;13(9):1349-1360. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14398. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
2
Initial rapidity of tumor growth as a prognostic factor for the therapeutic effect of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: evaluation for linear and non-linear correlation.肿瘤初始生长速度作为非小细胞肺癌患者免疫检查点抑制剂治疗效果的预后因素:线性和非线性相关性评估
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Aug;13(8):4903-4914. doi: 10.21037/jtd-21-774.

本文引用的文献

1
Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy for Squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.帕博利珠单抗联合化疗用于鳞状非小细胞肺癌。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 22;379(21):2040-2051. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1810865. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
2
Final Overall Survival Analysis From a Study Comparing First-Line Crizotinib Versus Chemotherapy in ALK-Mutation-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.一线克唑替尼对比化疗用于 ALK 基因突变阳性非小细胞肺癌的研究的最终总生存分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug 1;36(22):2251-2258. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.4794. Epub 2018 May 16.
3
Evaluation of the 7 and 8 editions of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging systems for lung cancer in a large North American cohort.
在一个大型北美队列中对美国癌症联合委员会/国际抗癌联盟(AJCC/UICC)肺癌TNM分期系统第7版和第8版的评估。
Oncotarget. 2017 May 24;8(40):66784-66795. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18158. eCollection 2017 Sep 15.
4
Ceritinib versus chemotherapy in patients with ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer previously given chemotherapy and crizotinib (ASCEND-5): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial.塞瑞替尼与化疗用于既往接受过化疗和克唑替尼治疗的间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)重排的非小细胞肺癌患者(ASCEND-5):一项随机、对照、开放标签、III 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jul;18(7):874-886. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30339-X. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
5
Alectinib versus Crizotinib in Untreated ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.阿来替尼对比克唑替尼用于未经治疗的 ALK 阳性非小细胞肺癌。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 31;377(9):829-838. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1704795. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
6
Alectinib versus crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (J-ALEX): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial.阿来替尼对比克唑替尼用于治疗 ALK 阳性非小细胞肺癌患者(J-ALEX):一项开放标签、随机、III 期临床试验。
Lancet. 2017 Jul 1;390(10089):29-39. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30565-2. Epub 2017 May 10.
7
Prognostic impact of M descriptors of the 8th edition of TNM classification of lung cancer.肺癌TNM分类第8版中M描述符的预后影响。
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Mar;9(3):685-691. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.03.106.
8
Erlotinib and bevacizumab in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and activating EGFR mutations (BELIEF): an international, multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial.厄洛替尼联合贝伐珠单抗治疗表皮生长因子受体突变的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者(BELIEF):一项国际、多中心、单臂、Ⅱ期临床试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2017 May;5(5):435-444. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30129-7. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
9
The TNM 8 M1b and M1c classification for non-small cell lung cancer in a cohort of patients with brain metastases.非小细胞肺癌脑转移患者队列中的 TNM8 M1b 和 M1c 分类。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2017 Sep;19(9):1141-1146. doi: 10.1007/s12094-017-1651-0. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
10
Clinical relevance of the M1b and M1c descriptors from the proposed TNM 8 classification of lung cancer.肺癌TNM 8分类中M1b和M1c描述符的临床相关性。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2017 May;193(5):392-401. doi: 10.1007/s00066-017-1118-9. Epub 2017 Feb 28.