Groupe d'Analyse, 1190 Avenue des Canadiens-de-Montréal, Tour Deloitte, Suite 1500, Montréal, QC, H3B 0M7, Canada.
Pharmaceuticals Division, F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070 Basel, Switzerland.
J Comp Eff Res. 2019 Oct;8(13):1067-1075. doi: 10.2217/cer-2019-0062. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
Despite long-term responses to first-line immunochemotherapy, many patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have relapsed/refractory disease. Second-line treatment options are available. However, a large proportion of patients are ineligible for transplantation/intensive therapy. This observational study of 702 patients in the USA, who used second-line therapies for relapsed/refractory DLBCL, evaluated treatment patterns and overall survival (OS). The study focused on the OS outcome of patients receiving second-line rituximab-bendamustine or rituximab-gemcitabine-oxaliplatin. Rituximab-bendamustine and rituximab-gemcitabine-oxaliplatin were received by 4.6 and 1.4% of patients, respectively (N = 42/702). Median and 1-year OS rates were similar between regimens. Many of the 200 different treatment regimens observed in second line were modified versions of National Comprehensive Cancer Network regimens.
尽管一线免疫化疗可带来长期缓解,但许多弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤 (DLBCL) 患者仍会出现复发/难治性疾病。二线治疗方案可用于治疗此类疾病。但是,很大一部分患者不适合进行移植/强化治疗。这项在美国 702 名接受二线治疗方案治疗复发/难治性 DLBCL 的患者的观察性研究评估了治疗模式和总生存期 (OS)。该研究重点关注接受二线利妥昔单抗-苯达莫司汀或利妥昔单抗-吉西他滨-奥沙利铂治疗的患者的 OS 结局。分别有 4.6%和 1.4%的患者接受了利妥昔单抗-苯达莫司汀和利妥昔单抗-吉西他滨-奥沙利铂治疗(n=42/702)。两种方案的中位和 1 年 OS 率相似。二线治疗中观察到的 200 多种不同治疗方案中有许多是国家综合癌症网络方案的改良版本。