Suppr超能文献

真实世界中弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤二线利妥昔单抗-苯达莫司汀与利妥昔单抗-吉西他滨-奥沙利铂的对比。

Second-line rituximab-bendamustine versus rituximab-gemcitabine-oxaliplatin in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the real world.

机构信息

Groupe d'Analyse, 1190 Avenue des Canadiens-de-Montréal, Tour Deloitte, Suite 1500, Montréal, QC, H3B 0M7, Canada.

Pharmaceuticals Division, F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070 Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Comp Eff Res. 2019 Oct;8(13):1067-1075. doi: 10.2217/cer-2019-0062. Epub 2019 Aug 27.

Abstract

Despite long-term responses to first-line immunochemotherapy, many patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have relapsed/refractory disease. Second-line treatment options are available. However, a large proportion of patients are ineligible for transplantation/intensive therapy. This observational study of 702 patients in the USA, who used second-line therapies for relapsed/refractory DLBCL, evaluated treatment patterns and overall survival (OS). The study focused on the OS outcome of patients receiving second-line rituximab-bendamustine or rituximab-gemcitabine-oxaliplatin. Rituximab-bendamustine and rituximab-gemcitabine-oxaliplatin were received by 4.6 and 1.4% of patients, respectively (N = 42/702). Median and 1-year OS rates were similar between regimens. Many of the 200 different treatment regimens observed in second line were modified versions of National Comprehensive Cancer Network regimens.

摘要

尽管一线免疫化疗可带来长期缓解,但许多弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤 (DLBCL) 患者仍会出现复发/难治性疾病。二线治疗方案可用于治疗此类疾病。但是,很大一部分患者不适合进行移植/强化治疗。这项在美国 702 名接受二线治疗方案治疗复发/难治性 DLBCL 的患者的观察性研究评估了治疗模式和总生存期 (OS)。该研究重点关注接受二线利妥昔单抗-苯达莫司汀或利妥昔单抗-吉西他滨-奥沙利铂治疗的患者的 OS 结局。分别有 4.6%和 1.4%的患者接受了利妥昔单抗-苯达莫司汀和利妥昔单抗-吉西他滨-奥沙利铂治疗(n=42/702)。两种方案的中位和 1 年 OS 率相似。二线治疗中观察到的 200 多种不同治疗方案中有许多是国家综合癌症网络方案的改良版本。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验