Hulbert-Williams Nicholas J, Norwood Sabrina, Gillanders David, Finucane Anne, Spiller Juliet, Strachan Jenny, Millington Sue, Swash Brooke
1Centre for Contextual Behavioural Science, School of Psychology, University of Chester, Parkgate Road, Chester, CH1 4BJ UK.
2School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019 Aug 20;5:104. doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0488-4. eCollection 2019.
Cancer affects millions of individuals globally, with a mortality rate of over eight million people annually. Although palliative care is often provided outside of specialist services, many people require, at some point in their illness journey, support from specialist palliative care services, for example, those provided in hospice settings. This transition can be a time of uncertainty and fear, and there is a need for effective interventions to meet the psychological and supportive care needs of people with cancer that cannot be cured. Whilst Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) has been shown to be effective across diverse health problems, robust evidence for its effectiveness in palliative cancer populations is not extensive.
This mixed-methods study uses a single-case experimental design with embedded qualitative interviews to pilot test a novel intervention for this patient group. Between 14 and 20 patients will be recruited from two hospices in England and Scotland. Participants will receive five face-to-face manualised sessions with a psychological therapist. Sessions are structured around teaching core ACT skills (openness, awareness and engagement) as a way to deal effectively with challenges of transition into specialist palliative care services. Outcome measures include cancer-specific quality of life (primary outcome) and distress (secondary outcome), which are assessed alongside measures of psychological flexibility. Daily diary outcome assessments will be taken for key measures, alongside more detailed weekly self-report, through baseline, intervention and 1-month follow-up phases. After follow-up, participants will be invited to take part in a qualitative interview to understand their experience of taking part and acceptability and perceived effectiveness of the intervention and its components.
This study is the first investigation of using ACT with terminally ill patients at the beginning of their transition into palliative treatment. Using in-depth single-case approaches, we will refine and manualise intervention content by the close of the study for use in follow-up research trials. Our long-term goal is then to test the intervention as delivered by non-psychologist specialist palliative care practitioners thus broadening the potential relevance of the approach.
Open Science Framework, 46033. Registered 19 April 2018.
癌症影响着全球数百万人,每年有超过800万人死亡。尽管姑息治疗通常在专科服务之外提供,但许多人在其疾病过程中的某个阶段需要专科姑息治疗服务的支持,例如临终关怀机构提供的服务。这种转变可能是一个充满不确定性和恐惧的时期,需要有效的干预措施来满足无法治愈的癌症患者的心理和支持性护理需求。虽然接纳与承诺疗法(ACT)已被证明在各种健康问题上有效,但关于其在姑息性癌症患者群体中有效性的有力证据并不广泛。
这项混合方法研究采用单病例实验设计,并嵌入定性访谈,以对该患者群体的一种新型干预措施进行试点测试。将从英格兰和苏格兰的两家临终关怀机构招募14至20名患者。参与者将与心理治疗师进行五次面对面的手册化治疗。治疗围绕教授ACT核心技能(开放性、意识和参与度)展开,作为有效应对过渡到专科姑息治疗服务挑战的一种方式。结果指标包括癌症特异性生活质量(主要指标)和痛苦程度(次要指标),同时还会评估心理灵活性指标。在基线、干预和1个月随访阶段,将对关键指标进行每日日记式结果评估,并进行更详细的每周自我报告。随访后,将邀请参与者参加定性访谈,以了解他们参与的体验以及干预措施及其组成部分的可接受性和感知有效性。
本研究是首次对在临终患者开始过渡到姑息治疗时使用ACT进行的调查。通过深入的单病例方法,我们将在研究结束时完善并手册化干预内容,以供后续研究试验使用。我们的长期目标是测试由非心理学家的专科姑息治疗从业者提供的干预措施,从而扩大该方法的潜在相关性。
开放科学框架,46033。于2018年4月19日注册。