Department of Anesthsiology and Intensive Care Medicine.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena.
Eur J Emerg Med. 2020 Apr;27(2):110-113. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000624.
Guidelines recommend Trendelenburg position for central venous cannulation. Critically ill patients in the emergency department often do not tolerate this positioning or have contraindications. Thirty-degree dorsal elevated position with positive end-expiratory pressure by noninvasive ventilation could pose an alternative. This is the first trial to investigate the feasibility of alternative for central venous cannulation in critically ill emergency department patients.
Ninety-one critically ill patients in the emergency department of Jena University Hospital were examined between August 2014 and May 2015. The cross-sectional area of the right internal jugular vein was measured in 3 different positions: 30° elevation, supine, and Trendelenburg position. Measurements were repeated with a continuous application of noninvasive ventilation.
Cross-sectional area of the right internal jugular vein in Trendelenburg position was largest (0.99 ± 0.66 cm) compared to supine (0.57 ± 0.58 cm) and 30° elevated position (0.25 ± 0.41 cm). In 30° elevated positioning, application of positive end-expiratory pressure significantly enlarged cross-sectional area (0.62 ± 0.70 cm). Noninvasive ventilation was a well-tolerated procedure (98%). In 30° elevated positioning with positive end-expiratory pressure a safe puncture (cross-sectional area ≥ 0.4 cm) could be expected in 68.1% of cases.
Thirty-degree elevated positioning with positive end-expiratory pressure via noninvasive ventilation could be a safe and well-tolerated alternative for central venous cannulation, especially for critically ill patients in emergency department unable to remain in Trendelenburg position. This proof-of-concept trial enables further studies with actual central venous cannulation.
指南推荐使用头高脚低位进行中心静脉置管。急诊科的危重症患者常不能耐受该体位或存在禁忌证。使用无创通气行呼气末正压通气(positive end-expiratory pressure,PEEP)的 30°仰卧位可能是一种替代方法。这是首次研究在急诊科危重症患者中替代中心静脉置管方法的可行性的试验。
2014 年 8 月至 2015 年 5 月,对耶拿大学医院急诊科的 91 例危重症患者进行了检查。在 3 种不同体位(30°抬高、仰卧位和头高脚低位)下测量右颈内静脉的横截面积。在持续应用无创通气的情况下重复测量。
与仰卧位(0.57 ± 0.58cm)和 30°抬高位(0.25 ± 0.41cm)相比,头高脚低位时右颈内静脉的横截面积最大(0.99 ± 0.66cm)。在 30°抬高位时,应用 PEEP 显著增加了横截面积(0.62 ± 0.70cm)。无创通气是一种耐受性良好的操作(98%)。在 30°抬高位加 PEEP 时,预计 68.1%的情况下可以进行安全穿刺(横截面积≥0.4cm)。
使用无创通气行 30°抬高位加 PEEP 可能是一种安全且耐受性良好的中心静脉置管替代方法,尤其适用于不能保持头高脚低位的急诊科危重症患者。这项可行性试验为实际的中心静脉置管研究提供了依据。