Suppr超能文献

养老院居民的疼痛管理:一项试点有效性-实施研究的结果。

Pain Management in Nursing Home Residents: Findings from a Pilot Effectiveness-Implementation Study.

机构信息

Nursing Science (INS), Department Public Health (DPH), Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Inselspital Bern University Hospital, Nursing Research Unit, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Dec;67(12):2574-2580. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16148. Epub 2019 Aug 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of a multilevel pain management intervention in nursing homes (NHs) comprising a pain management guideline, care worker training, and pain champions.

DESIGN

An implementation science pilot study using a quasi-experimental effectiveness-implementation (hybrid II) design.

SETTING

Four NHs in Switzerland.

PARTICIPANTS

All consenting long-term residents aged 65 years and older with pain at baseline (N = 62) and all registered and licensed practical nurses (N = 61).

INTERVENTION

Implementation of a contextually adapted pain management guideline, interactive training workshops for all care workers, and specifically trained pain champions.

MEASUREMENTS

Interference from pain, worst and average pain intensity over the previous 24 hours; proxy ratings of pain with the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia scale; and care workers' appraisal of the guideline's reach, acceptability, and adoption.

RESULTS

Pain-related outcomes improved for self-reporting residents (n = 43) and residents with proxy rating (n = 19). Significant improvements of average pain from baseline to T1 (P = .006), and in worst pain from baseline to T1 (P = .003) and T2 (P = .004). No significant changes in interference from pain (P = .18). With regard to the implementation efforts, about 76% of care workers indicated they were familiar with the guideline; 70.4% agreed that the guideline is practical and matches their ideas of good pain assessment (75.9%) and treatment (79.7%).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of a multilevel pain management intervention did significantly improve average and worst pain intensity in NH residents. However, to effect clinical meaningful changes in interference from pain, a more comprehensive approach involving other disciplines may be necessary. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:2574-2580, 2019.

摘要

目的

评估包含疼痛管理指南、护理人员培训和疼痛拥护者的多层面疼痛管理干预措施在养老院(NH)中的效果和实施情况。

设计

采用准实验效果-实施(混合 II)设计的实施科学试点研究。

设置

瑞士的 4 家 NH。

参与者

所有同意参加的年龄在 65 岁及以上且基线时有疼痛的长期居民(N=62)和所有注册和持照的执业护士(N=61)。

干预

实施了一项经上下文调整的疼痛管理指南,对所有护理人员进行了互动培训研讨会,并专门培训了疼痛拥护者。

测量

疼痛相关干扰,前 24 小时内最痛和平均疼痛强度;用高级痴呆症疼痛评估量表进行疼痛的代理评估;以及护理人员对指南的可及性、可接受性和采用程度的评价。

结果

自我报告的居民(n=43)和有代理评估的居民(n=19)的疼痛相关结果得到改善。平均疼痛从基线到 T1(P=0.006),最痛疼痛从基线到 T1(P=0.003)和 T2(P=0.004)均有显著改善。疼痛干扰无显著变化(P=0.18)。关于实施工作,约 76%的护理人员表示熟悉指南;70.4%的人认为该指南实用,符合他们对良好疼痛评估(75.9%)和治疗(79.7%)的想法。

结论

多层面疼痛管理干预的实施显著改善了 NH 居民的平均和最痛疼痛强度。然而,要使疼痛干扰方面产生有临床意义的变化,可能需要采取更全面的方法,涉及其他学科。美国老年学会杂志 67:2574-2580,2019 年。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验