Suppr超能文献

GABA 受体的结合位点位置决定了静脉全身麻醉剂混合物在体内是协同作用还是相加作用。

Binding site location on GABA receptors determines whether mixtures of intravenous general anaesthetics interact synergistically or additively in vivo.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Department of Anaesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Br J Pharmacol. 2019 Dec;176(24):4760-4772. doi: 10.1111/bph.14843. Epub 2019 Dec 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

General anaesthetics can act on synaptic GABA receptors by binding to one of three classes of general anaesthetic sites. Canonical drugs that bind selectively to only one class of site are etomidate, alphaxalone, and the mephobarbital derivative, R-mTFD-MPAB. We tested the hypothesis that the general anaesthetic potencies of mixtures of such site-selective agents binding to the same or to different sites would combine additively or synergistically respectively.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

The potency of general anaesthetics individually or in combinations to cause loss of righting reflexes in tadpoles was determined, and the results were analysed using isobolographic methods.

KEY RESULTS

The potencies of combinations of two or three site-selective anaesthetics that all acted on a single class of site were strictly additive, regardless of which single site was involved. Combinations of two or three site-selective anaesthetics that all bound selectively to different sites always interacted synergistically. The strength of the synergy increased with the number of separate sites involved such that the percentage of each agent's EC required to cause anaesthesia was just 35% and 14% for two or three sites respectively. Propofol, which binds non-selectively to the etomidate and R-mTFD-MPAB sites, interacted synergistically with each of these agents.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The established pharmacology of the three anaesthetic binding sites on synaptic GABA receptors was sufficient to predict whether a mixture of anaesthetics interacted additively or synergistically to cause loss of righting reflexes in vivo. The principles established here have implications for clinical practice.

摘要

背景和目的

全身麻醉剂可通过与三种类型的全身麻醉剂结合在突触 GABA 受体上发挥作用。选择性结合仅一类位点的经典药物有依托咪酯、alphaxalone 和甲巴比妥衍生物 R-mTFD-MPAB。我们检验了这样一种假设,即结合相同或不同位点的这类位点选择性药物的混合物的全身麻醉效能分别为相加或协同作用。

实验方法

通过确定混合物对导致蝌蚪翻正反射丧失的个体或组合的麻醉效能,并用等比图形分析法分析结果。

主要结果

所有作用于单一类型位点的两种或三种位点选择性麻醉剂的组合的效能严格为相加性,无论涉及到的是单一的哪一个位点。所有选择性结合不同位点的两种或三种位点选择性麻醉剂的组合总是表现出协同作用。协同作用的强度随所涉及的分离位点的数量增加而增加,以至于两种或三种药物各自引起麻醉所需的 EC 的百分比仅为 35%和 14%。非选择性结合依托咪酯和 R-mTFD-MPAB 位点的丙泊酚与这两种药物均表现出协同作用。

结论和意义

突触 GABA 受体上的三种麻醉剂结合位点的既定药理学足以预测麻醉剂混合物是否会通过体内丧失翻正反射而产生相加或协同作用。这里建立的原则对临床实践具有意义。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

10

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验