Suppr超能文献

颈椎外固定器对前路颈椎间盘切除融合术患者临床和影像学结果的影响。

Effect of external cervical orthoses on clinical and radiological outcome of patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, S. Anna University Hospital, Ferrara, Italy.

Department of Radiology, S. Anna University Hospital, Ferrara, Italy.

出版信息

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2019 Oct;161(10):2195-2200. doi: 10.1007/s00701-019-04046-5. Epub 2019 Aug 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The current use of external cervical orthoses (ECO) after cervical discectomy is still based on a common practice than a solid scientific literature. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of ECO on radiological and functional outcomes in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

METHODS

We compared two cohorts of consecutive patients who underwent ACDF with and without ECO after surgery. Thirty-six patients operated from January 2015 to June 2016 received an ECO whereas 36 patients, operated from July 2016 to December 2017, did not. Each patient underwent radiological and functional evaluation using plain x-ray at 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery and Neck Disability Index (NDI) at 2 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery, respectively.

RESULTS

In the ECO group, 5 patients (13.9%) presented an incomplete fusion and 31 patients (86.1%) presented a complete fusion (CI 0.705-0.953). In the non-ECO group, 8 patients (22.2%) presented an incomplete fusion and 28 patients (77.8% [CI 0.608-0.899]) had a complete fusion, with no statistically significant differences between two groups. No statistically significant differences were also observed regarding the NDI neither at 2 weeks nor at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. At multivariate analysis, patients who underwent two-level ACDF showed a five-fold increased risk of worse NDI at 3-, 6-, 12-month (p = 0.003, CI 1.770-14.584) follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

We advise against the routine use of ECO after single- or two-level ACDF as we did not find out any significant statistical differences between the two groups.

摘要

背景

目前颈椎间盘切除术后使用外部颈椎矫形器(ECO)仍然基于常规做法,而非确凿的科学文献。本研究旨在评估 ECO 对行前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)患者的影像学和功能结果的影响。

方法

我们比较了两组连续接受 ACDF 手术的患者,一组术后使用 ECO,另一组未使用 ECO。36 例患者于 2015 年 1 月至 2016 年 6 月接受 ECO,36 例患者于 2016 年 7 月至 2017 年 12 月接受 ECO。每位患者术后 1、6 和 12 个月行 X 线平片检查,术后 2 周、3、6 和 12 个月行颈椎残障指数(NDI)评估。

结果

在 ECO 组中,5 例(13.9%)存在不完全融合,31 例(86.1%)存在完全融合(CI 0.705-0.953)。在非 ECO 组中,8 例(22.2%)存在不完全融合,28 例(77.8% [CI 0.608-0.899])存在完全融合,两组间无统计学差异。在 2 周及 3、6 和 12 个月随访时,NDI 也无统计学差异。多变量分析显示,行双节段 ACDF 的患者在 3、6、12 个月(p = 0.003,CI 1.770-14.584)随访时 NDI 恶化的风险增加五倍。

结论

我们不建议在单节段或双节段 ACDF 后常规使用 ECO,因为我们未发现两组间存在任何显著的统计学差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验