• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈椎外固定器对前路颈椎间盘切除融合术患者临床和影像学结果的影响。

Effect of external cervical orthoses on clinical and radiological outcome of patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, S. Anna University Hospital, Ferrara, Italy.

Department of Radiology, S. Anna University Hospital, Ferrara, Italy.

出版信息

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2019 Oct;161(10):2195-2200. doi: 10.1007/s00701-019-04046-5. Epub 2019 Aug 27.

DOI:10.1007/s00701-019-04046-5
PMID:31455994
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The current use of external cervical orthoses (ECO) after cervical discectomy is still based on a common practice than a solid scientific literature. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of ECO on radiological and functional outcomes in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

METHODS

We compared two cohorts of consecutive patients who underwent ACDF with and without ECO after surgery. Thirty-six patients operated from January 2015 to June 2016 received an ECO whereas 36 patients, operated from July 2016 to December 2017, did not. Each patient underwent radiological and functional evaluation using plain x-ray at 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery and Neck Disability Index (NDI) at 2 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery, respectively.

RESULTS

In the ECO group, 5 patients (13.9%) presented an incomplete fusion and 31 patients (86.1%) presented a complete fusion (CI 0.705-0.953). In the non-ECO group, 8 patients (22.2%) presented an incomplete fusion and 28 patients (77.8% [CI 0.608-0.899]) had a complete fusion, with no statistically significant differences between two groups. No statistically significant differences were also observed regarding the NDI neither at 2 weeks nor at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. At multivariate analysis, patients who underwent two-level ACDF showed a five-fold increased risk of worse NDI at 3-, 6-, 12-month (p = 0.003, CI 1.770-14.584) follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

We advise against the routine use of ECO after single- or two-level ACDF as we did not find out any significant statistical differences between the two groups.

摘要

背景

目前颈椎间盘切除术后使用外部颈椎矫形器(ECO)仍然基于常规做法,而非确凿的科学文献。本研究旨在评估 ECO 对行前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)患者的影像学和功能结果的影响。

方法

我们比较了两组连续接受 ACDF 手术的患者,一组术后使用 ECO,另一组未使用 ECO。36 例患者于 2015 年 1 月至 2016 年 6 月接受 ECO,36 例患者于 2016 年 7 月至 2017 年 12 月接受 ECO。每位患者术后 1、6 和 12 个月行 X 线平片检查,术后 2 周、3、6 和 12 个月行颈椎残障指数(NDI)评估。

结果

在 ECO 组中,5 例(13.9%)存在不完全融合,31 例(86.1%)存在完全融合(CI 0.705-0.953)。在非 ECO 组中,8 例(22.2%)存在不完全融合,28 例(77.8% [CI 0.608-0.899])存在完全融合,两组间无统计学差异。在 2 周及 3、6 和 12 个月随访时,NDI 也无统计学差异。多变量分析显示,行双节段 ACDF 的患者在 3、6、12 个月(p = 0.003,CI 1.770-14.584)随访时 NDI 恶化的风险增加五倍。

结论

我们不建议在单节段或双节段 ACDF 后常规使用 ECO,因为我们未发现两组间存在任何显著的统计学差异。

相似文献

1
Effect of external cervical orthoses on clinical and radiological outcome of patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.颈椎外固定器对前路颈椎间盘切除融合术患者临床和影像学结果的影响。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2019 Oct;161(10):2195-2200. doi: 10.1007/s00701-019-04046-5. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
2
Cervical kinematics and radiological changes after Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion.与融合术相比,Discover人工椎间盘置换术后的颈椎运动学及影像学变化。
Spine J. 2014 Jun 1;14(6):867-77. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.432. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
3
Comparison of cervical kinematics between patients with cervical artificial disc replacement and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical disc herniation.颈椎间盘突出症患者颈椎人工椎间盘置换与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的颈椎运动学比较。
Spine J. 2014 Jul 1;14(7):1199-204. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.010. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
4
Prospective randomized study of cervical arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with long-term follow-up: results in 74 patients from a single site.前瞻性随机研究颈椎关节成形术与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术,长期随访:单中心 74 例患者的结果。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Jan;18(1):36-42. doi: 10.3171/2012.9.SPINE12555. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
5
Heterotopic ossification following single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results from the prospective, multicenter, historically controlled trial comparing allograft to an optimized dose of rhBMP-2.单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后的异位骨化:比较同种异体骨与优化剂量重组人骨形态发生蛋白-2的前瞻性、多中心、历史对照试验结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Sep;25(3):292-302. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.SPINE15798. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
6
The NECK trial: Effectiveness of anterior cervical discectomy with or without interbody fusion and arthroplasty in the treatment of cervical disc herniation; a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.NEK 试验:颈椎间盘突出症前路颈椎间盘切除伴或不伴椎间融合及关节成形术的疗效:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Spine J. 2019 Jun;19(6):965-975. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.12.013. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
7
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with implantable titanium cage: initial impressions, patient outcomes and comparison to fusion with allograft.前路颈椎间盘切除及可植入钛笼融合术:初步印象、患者预后及与同种异体骨融合术的比较
Spine J. 2004 Mar-Apr;4(2):184-91; discussion 191. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.05.001.
8
Artificial disc replacement combined with fusion versus two-level fusion in cervical two-level disc disease.人工椎间盘置换联合融合术与双节段颈椎间盘疾病的双节段融合术的比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 May 15;34(11):1153-9; discussion 1160-1. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819c9d39.
9
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a zero-profile integrated plate and spacer device: a clinical and radiological study: Clinical article.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术联合零切迹一体化板和间隔器装置:一项临床和影像学研究:临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Oct;21(4):529-37. doi: 10.3171/2014.6.SPINE12951. Epub 2014 Aug 8.
10
Five-year clinical results of cervical total disc replacement compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption clinical trial.颈椎间盘置换与前路椎间盘切除融合术治疗双节段症状性退行性椎间盘疾病的五年临床结果:一项前瞻性、随机、对照、多中心研究性器械豁免临床试验。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Aug;25(2):213-24. doi: 10.3171/2015.12.SPINE15824. Epub 2016 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of surgeons' experience and practice on postoperative cervical collar use after single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a cross-sectional survey in Heilongjiang province, China.外科医生的经验与实践对单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后颈托使用的影响:中国黑龙江省的一项横断面调查
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jul 4;26(1):647. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08880-w.
2
Future perspectives after the guidelines of degenerative cervical myelopathy: A narrative review.退行性颈椎脊髓病指南后的未来展望:一篇叙述性综述。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2025 Jun 14;68:103104. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103104. eCollection 2025 Sep.
3
Support or constraint? A comprehensive analysis of postoperative cervical bracing practices: insights from the Italian society of neurosurgery (SINch) survey and a systematic review of the literature.
支持还是限制?对术后颈椎支具应用的全面分析:来自意大利神经外科学会(SINch)调查的见解及文献系统综述
Eur Spine J. 2025 Aug;34(8):3113-3126. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08913-x. Epub 2025 May 30.
4
Is it necessary to use a cervical brace after single- or double-level ACDF?单节段或双节段 ACDF 后是否需要使用颈围?
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jul 5;103(27):e38816. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038816.
5
Comparison of outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with and without a cervical collar: a systematic review and meta-analysis.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术与颈围固定治疗的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Mar 7;19(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04661-8.
6
Cervical collar use following anterior cervical hybrid surgery: protocol for a prospective randomized, time-controlled trial.颈椎领在颈椎前路杂交手术后的应用:一项前瞻性随机、时间对照试验的方案。
Trials. 2023 Jun 16;24(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07409-7.
7
The Utility of Postoperative Bracing on Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Following Cervical Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review.颈椎手术后术后支具对影像学和临床结果的作用:一项系统评价
Global Spine J. 2023 Mar;13(2):512-522. doi: 10.1177/21925682221098361. Epub 2022 May 2.
8
Factors affecting functional outcome after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A multicenter study.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后影响功能预后的因素:一项多中心研究。
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2021 Apr-Jun;12(2):144-148. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_1_21. Epub 2021 Jun 10.