Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 13-1 Takaramachi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, 920-8641, Japan.
Int Orthop. 2020 Feb;44(2):245-251. doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04394-y. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
To investigate whether anatomic and straight stems could reproduce the anteroposterior distance (AD) of the native femoral head and evaluate the effect of AD of the femoral head on range of motion (ROM) and bony impingement.
This retrospective simulation study included 64 patients who had undergone primary total hip arthroplasty between 2012 and 2014. Using computed tomography (CT)-based templating software, anatomic and straight stems were inserted with same alignment. AD of the head centre was compared between the two stems and native anatomy. Furthermore, post-operative ROM was calculated, and correlation between AD and ROM was assessed.
There was a strong positive correlation between native anteversion (mean 21.9°) and anatomic stem anteversion (mean 22.5°) (R = 0.975, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in AD between the native and anatomic stems (mean 37.7 and 38.8 mm, respectively), but AD of the straight stem was significantly lower than that of the native and anatomic stems. The straight stem showed a significantly lower ROM in flexion and internal rotation angles with 90° flexion (IR) than the anatomic stem (P < 0.05 and P < 0.001, respectively). AD showed a stronger correlation with ROM of IR than with stem anteversion.
The anatomic stem could reproduce AD of the native femoral head centre, but the head centre of the straight stem in the same anteversion with anatomic stem translated significantly posterior, significantly decreasing the ROM of flexion and IR and increasing bony impingement of IR. To avoid bony impingement and acquire sufficient ROM, reproducing AD was important.
探讨解剖型和直型柄能否重现股骨近端解剖中心前后向距离(anterior-posterior distance,AD),并评估股骨近端 AD 对活动度(range of motion,ROM)和骨撞击的影响。
本回顾性模拟研究纳入了 2012 年至 2014 年间接受初次全髋关节置换术的 64 例患者。通过 CT 基于模板的软件,采用相同的对线方式插入解剖型和直型柄。比较两种柄与股骨近端解剖结构的头中心 AD。此外,计算术后 ROM,并评估 AD 与 ROM 的相关性。
股骨近端前倾角(mean 21.9°)与解剖型柄前倾角(mean 22.5°)之间存在强烈的正相关性(R = 0.975,P < 0.001)。股骨近端和解剖型柄的 AD 之间无显著差异(mean 分别为 37.7 和 38.8 mm),但直型柄的 AD 明显低于股骨近端和解剖型柄。直型柄在 90°屈曲时的屈曲和内旋角度的 ROM 明显低于解剖型柄(P < 0.05 和 P < 0.001)。AD 与 IR 的 ROM 相关性强于与柄前倾角的相关性。
解剖型柄可以重现股骨近端解剖中心的 AD,但在相同前倾角下,直型柄的头中心向后显著移位,显著降低了屈曲和内旋的 ROM,并增加了内旋的骨性撞击。为避免骨性撞击并获得足够的 ROM,重现 AD 非常重要。