Department of Medicine, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W., Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2019 Dec;24(5):853-863. doi: 10.1007/s10459-019-09908-2. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
Although educators frequently act as if curricula are as standardized as drug doses (300 mg of PBL t.i.d.), such is not the case. As a case in point, at its inception, Problem Based Learning was hailed as a major curriculum innovation, with the promise of enormous gains in learning outcomes. Very quickly, ecclesiastical debates arose as what was true PBL and what was "modified PBL". Ironically, systematic reviews conducted fairly early in its evolution showed that the gains in learning outcome from PBL were neither large nor uniform (Vernon and Blake in Acad Med 68:550-563, 1993), and the most consistent finding was greater student satisfaction. In this paper, we review five decades of experience with the first PBL curriculum at McMaster. We point out how the curriculum has evolved, both theoretically and practically, in response to external influences, based both on empirical evidence and practical demands. We describe these changes in four broad domains-theoretical rationale, the curriculum, assessment and admissions.
虽然教育工作者经常表现得好像课程像药物剂量一样标准化(300mg PBL,每日三次),但事实并非如此。例如,在最初阶段,基于问题的学习被誉为一项重大的课程创新,有望在学习成果上取得巨大收益。很快,就出现了关于什么是真正的 PBL 和什么是“改良 PBL”的争论。具有讽刺意味的是,在其发展的早期阶段进行的系统评价表明,PBL 在学习成果上的收益既不大也不统一(Vernon 和 Blake 在 Acad Med 68:550-563, 1993),最一致的发现是学生满意度更高。在本文中,我们回顾了麦克马斯特大学第一个 PBL 课程的五十年经验。我们指出,课程是如何根据实证证据和实际需求,针对外部影响,在理论和实践上不断发展的。我们在四个广泛的领域——理论原理、课程、评估和招生——描述了这些变化。